A systematic review and guide for using multi-response statistical models in co-infection research.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.231589
Francisca Powell-Romero, Konstans Wells, Nicholas J Clark
{"title":"A systematic review and guide for using multi-response statistical models in co-infection research.","authors":"Francisca Powell-Romero, Konstans Wells, Nicholas J Clark","doi":"10.1098/rsos.231589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The simultaneous infection of organisms with two or more co-occurring pathogens, otherwise known as co-infections, concomitant infections or multiple infections, plays a significant role in the dynamics and consequences of infectious diseases in both humans and animals. To understand co-infections, ecologists and epidemiologists rely on models capable of accommodating multiple response variables. However, given the diversity of available approaches, choosing a model that is suitable for drawing meaningful conclusions from observational data is not a straightforward task. To provide clearer guidance for statistical model use in co-infection research, we conducted a systematic review to (i) understand the breadth of study goals and host-pathogen systems being pursued with multi-response models and (ii) determine the degree of crossover of knowledge among disciplines. In total, we identified 69 peer-reviewed primary studies that jointly measured infection patterns with two or more pathogens of humans or animals in natural environments. We found stark divisions in research objectives and methods among different disciplines, suggesting that cross-disciplinary insights into co-infection patterns and processes for different human and animal contexts are currently limited. Citation network analysis also revealed limited knowledge exchange between ecology and epidemiology. These findings collectively highlight the need for greater interdisciplinary collaboration for improving disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"11 10","pages":"231589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The simultaneous infection of organisms with two or more co-occurring pathogens, otherwise known as co-infections, concomitant infections or multiple infections, plays a significant role in the dynamics and consequences of infectious diseases in both humans and animals. To understand co-infections, ecologists and epidemiologists rely on models capable of accommodating multiple response variables. However, given the diversity of available approaches, choosing a model that is suitable for drawing meaningful conclusions from observational data is not a straightforward task. To provide clearer guidance for statistical model use in co-infection research, we conducted a systematic review to (i) understand the breadth of study goals and host-pathogen systems being pursued with multi-response models and (ii) determine the degree of crossover of knowledge among disciplines. In total, we identified 69 peer-reviewed primary studies that jointly measured infection patterns with two or more pathogens of humans or animals in natural environments. We found stark divisions in research objectives and methods among different disciplines, suggesting that cross-disciplinary insights into co-infection patterns and processes for different human and animal contexts are currently limited. Citation network analysis also revealed limited knowledge exchange between ecology and epidemiology. These findings collectively highlight the need for greater interdisciplinary collaboration for improving disease management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在共同感染研究中使用多反应统计模型的系统综述和指南。
生物体同时感染两种或两种以上同时出现的病原体,又称共同感染、伴随感染或多重感染,在人类和动物感染性疾病的动态和后果中发挥着重要作用。为了了解共同感染,生态学家和流行病学家依赖于能够容纳多个响应变量的模型。然而,由于可用的方法多种多样,选择一个适合从观察数据中得出有意义结论的模型并非易事。为了给共同感染研究中统计模型的使用提供更明确的指导,我们进行了一项系统性综述,目的是:(i) 了解使用多反应模型所追求的研究目标和宿主-病原体系统的广度;(ii) 确定各学科间知识的交叉程度。我们总共确定了 69 项经同行评审的主要研究,这些研究联合测量了自然环境中两种或两种以上病原体对人类或动物的感染模式。我们发现,不同学科之间的研究目标和方法存在明显差异,这表明目前针对不同人类和动物环境下的共同感染模式和过程的跨学科见解非常有限。引文网络分析还显示生态学和流行病学之间的知识交流有限。这些发现共同凸显了加强跨学科合作以改善疾病管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the mechanics of rectangular peg-hole disassembly and the effect of the active compliance centre on the extraction force. Cross-sectional personal network analysis of adult smoking in rural areas. Late Triassic †Cryptovaranoides microlanius is a squamate, not an archosauromorph. What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters. Data-driven Huntington's disease progression modelling and estimation of societal cost in the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1