What Explains Voting for DENK: Issues, Discrimination or In-group Favouritism?

Q2 Social Sciences Representation Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00344893.2024.2387011
Sanne van Oosten, Liza Mügge, Armen Hakhverdian, Daphne van der Pas
{"title":"What Explains Voting for DENK: Issues, Discrimination or In-group Favouritism?","authors":"Sanne van Oosten, Liza Mügge, Armen Hakhverdian, Daphne van der Pas","doi":"10.1080/00344893.2024.2387011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Why do ethnic and religious minorities vote for DENK? DENK is the first pro-Turkey and pro-Islam party represented in Dutch parliament, led by Turkish- and Moroccan-origin politicians who openly profess to practicing Islam. Drawing on an original survey (<i>N</i>= 905) among Dutch voters in which we oversampled those with Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese roots, we put three possible explanations to the test: issues, discrimination and in-group favouritism. Each subsample is religiously mixed and includes Muslims and/or Christians and voters who are not religious. While ethnic in-group favouritism, feelings of belonging in the Netherlands, experiences with discrimination and issues sometimes explain voting for DENK, Muslim in-group favouritism is the decisive factor. These findings contribute to understanding voting behaviour in increasingly religiously diverse European immigration societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":35158,"journal":{"name":"Representation","volume":"60 4","pages":"601-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2024.2387011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do ethnic and religious minorities vote for DENK? DENK is the first pro-Turkey and pro-Islam party represented in Dutch parliament, led by Turkish- and Moroccan-origin politicians who openly profess to practicing Islam. Drawing on an original survey (N= 905) among Dutch voters in which we oversampled those with Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese roots, we put three possible explanations to the test: issues, discrimination and in-group favouritism. Each subsample is religiously mixed and includes Muslims and/or Christians and voters who are not religious. While ethnic in-group favouritism, feelings of belonging in the Netherlands, experiences with discrimination and issues sometimes explain voting for DENK, Muslim in-group favouritism is the decisive factor. These findings contribute to understanding voting behaviour in increasingly religiously diverse European immigration societies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投票支持 DENK 的原因是什么:问题、歧视还是内部偏袒?
少数民族和宗教少数群体为何投票支持电化教育党?DENK 是荷兰议会中第一个亲土耳其和亲伊斯兰教的政党,由公开宣称信奉伊斯兰教的土耳其和摩洛哥裔政治家领导。我们在荷兰选民中进行了一次原始调查(样本数= 905),其中对土耳其、摩洛哥和苏里南裔选民进行了超量抽样调查,我们利用该调查对三种可能的解释进行了检验:问题、歧视和群体内偏袒。每个子样本都是宗教混合样本,包括穆斯林和/或基督徒以及无宗教信仰的选民。虽然族群内偏好、对荷兰的归属感、歧视经历和问题有时可以解释投票给电化教育组织的原因,但穆斯林族群内偏好是决定性因素。这些发现有助于理解在宗教日益多元化的欧洲移民社会中的投票行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Representation
Representation Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: This change in scope follows two paths. Firstly, it seeks contributors who are interested in exploring the interface between democratic practice and theory. In particular, this focus seeks contributions that apply theoretical insights to actual examples of current practice. Secondly, while not neglecting the current focus of the journal, we would like to expand its international coverage so that the journal will offer our readers insights in the state of democracy worldwide.
期刊最新文献
What Explains Voting for DENK: Issues, Discrimination or In-group Favouritism? Sport as a Pathway to Political Office and its Gendered Effects Democracy at the Limit: Does the U.S. Debt Ceiling Really Enhance Fiscal Accountability? Voting Local? Electoral Rules and Geographical Representation in Europe Try, Try Again? Are Unsuccessful Leadership Contestants Sore Losers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1