A Comparative Evaluation of the Acidogenic Potential of Lactose-based, Soy-based, Protein Hydrolysate-based, and Iron-based Milk Formulas Based on Dental Plaque pH, Salivary pH, and Buffering Capacity: An In Vivo Study.

Adishree Mahanta, Gunjan Yadav, Sonali Saha, Kavita Dhinsa, Anshul Sharma, Amit Rai
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of the Acidogenic Potential of Lactose-based, Soy-based, Protein Hydrolysate-based, and Iron-based Milk Formulas Based on Dental Plaque pH, Salivary pH, and Buffering Capacity: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.","authors":"Adishree Mahanta, Gunjan Yadav, Sonali Saha, Kavita Dhinsa, Anshul Sharma, Amit Rai","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>Breastfeeding is the gold standard nutrition for infants. However, the inability of infants to latch on, maternal complaints of sore or painful nipples, and insufficient milk supply frequently result in early breastfeeding cessation. Hence, milk has subsequently been replaced by infant formula milks of high quality, which serve as an alternate source of nutrition for infants. There also has been a rising concern among parents and caretakers regarding the cariogenic potential of the various milk formulas available in the market due to the presence of fermentable carbohydrates in them, leading to an increase in nursing caries or early childhood caries. Hence, this study aims to comparatively evaluate the acidogenic potential of four different milk formulas based on dental plaque pH, salivary pH, and buffering capacity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the acidogenic potential of various infant milk formulas using three main parameters of measurement of caries: evaluation of salivary pH, plaque pH, and buffering capacity.Baseline plaque and salivary pH and postconsumption plaque pH and salivary pH were assessed after 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 minutes in 60 healthy children (15 in each study group) aged 7-12 years after rinsing with group I (lactose-based), group II (soy-based), group III (protein hydrolysate-based), and group IV (iron-based) milk formulas. The pH was assessed using a precalibrated digital pH meter. Plaque pH was also further assessed based on its buffering capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Soy-based and protein hydrolysate-based milk formulas were found to be most cariogenic in both saliva and plaque. Lactose-based formulas were found to be the least cariogenic of all the milk formulas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents and caretakers must be made aware of the various types of milk formulas available, their composition, as well as their relative cariogenic nature. Feeding should always be supervised, and infants should not be left with milk-containing bottles as comforters. Milk feeds at bedtime, when salivary flow is reduced, should be discouraged. Dentists and pediatricians should be aware of the caries-related risk associated with different milk formulas before recommending them to children.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Knowledge and awareness among parents and caretakers regarding the cariogenicity of various milk formulas available in the market.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mahanta A, Yadav G, Saha S, <i>et al.</i> A Comparative Evaluation of the Acidogenic Potential of Lactose-based, Soy-based, Protein Hydrolysate-based, and Iron-based Milk Formulas Based on Dental Plaque pH, Salivary pH, and Buffering Capacity: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):851-859.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"851-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and background: Breastfeeding is the gold standard nutrition for infants. However, the inability of infants to latch on, maternal complaints of sore or painful nipples, and insufficient milk supply frequently result in early breastfeeding cessation. Hence, milk has subsequently been replaced by infant formula milks of high quality, which serve as an alternate source of nutrition for infants. There also has been a rising concern among parents and caretakers regarding the cariogenic potential of the various milk formulas available in the market due to the presence of fermentable carbohydrates in them, leading to an increase in nursing caries or early childhood caries. Hence, this study aims to comparatively evaluate the acidogenic potential of four different milk formulas based on dental plaque pH, salivary pH, and buffering capacity.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the acidogenic potential of various infant milk formulas using three main parameters of measurement of caries: evaluation of salivary pH, plaque pH, and buffering capacity.Baseline plaque and salivary pH and postconsumption plaque pH and salivary pH were assessed after 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 minutes in 60 healthy children (15 in each study group) aged 7-12 years after rinsing with group I (lactose-based), group II (soy-based), group III (protein hydrolysate-based), and group IV (iron-based) milk formulas. The pH was assessed using a precalibrated digital pH meter. Plaque pH was also further assessed based on its buffering capacity.

Results: Soy-based and protein hydrolysate-based milk formulas were found to be most cariogenic in both saliva and plaque. Lactose-based formulas were found to be the least cariogenic of all the milk formulas.

Conclusion: Parents and caretakers must be made aware of the various types of milk formulas available, their composition, as well as their relative cariogenic nature. Feeding should always be supervised, and infants should not be left with milk-containing bottles as comforters. Milk feeds at bedtime, when salivary flow is reduced, should be discouraged. Dentists and pediatricians should be aware of the caries-related risk associated with different milk formulas before recommending them to children.

Clinical significance: Knowledge and awareness among parents and caretakers regarding the cariogenicity of various milk formulas available in the market.

How to cite this article: Mahanta A, Yadav G, Saha S, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of the Acidogenic Potential of Lactose-based, Soy-based, Protein Hydrolysate-based, and Iron-based Milk Formulas Based on Dental Plaque pH, Salivary pH, and Buffering Capacity: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):851-859.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于牙菌斑 pH 值、唾液 pH 值和缓冲能力的乳糖配方奶、大豆配方奶、水解蛋白配方奶和铁配方奶致酸性的比较评估:体内研究。
目的和背景:母乳喂养是婴儿营养的黄金标准。然而,由于婴儿无法吮吸、母亲抱怨乳头疼痛或疼痛以及奶水供应不足,经常导致婴儿过早停止母乳喂养。因此,优质婴儿配方奶后来取代了母乳,成为婴儿的另一种营养来源。此外,由于市场上的各种配方奶粉中含有可发酵碳水化合物,导致哺乳期龋齿或幼儿期龋齿增加,家长和护理人员对其致癌可能性的关注也日益增加。因此,本研究旨在根据牙菌斑 pH 值、唾液 pH 值和缓冲能力对四种不同配方奶粉的致酸潜能进行比较评估:这项横断面研究采用了测量龋齿的三个主要参数:评估唾液 pH 值、牙菌斑 pH 值和缓冲能力,以评估各种婴儿配方奶粉的致酸潜力。60 名 7-12 岁的健康儿童(每个研究组 15 人)在冲洗了第一组(乳糖配方)、第二组(大豆配方)、第三组(蛋白水解物配方)和第四组(铁配方)奶粉后,分别在 5、10、15、20、30 和 60 分钟后对牙菌斑和唾液 pH 值进行了基线评估。pH 值使用预校准数字 pH 计进行评估。还根据牙菌斑的缓冲能力进一步评估了牙菌斑的 pH 值:结果:大豆和蛋白水解物配方奶粉在唾液和牙菌斑中的致龋性最强。结论:父母和看护人必须了解现有的各种奶粉、它们的成分以及相对的致龋性。喂奶时应始终有人看管,不应将含牛奶的奶瓶留给婴儿作为安慰剂。睡前唾液分泌减少,应避免喂奶。牙医和儿科医生在向儿童推荐不同配方奶之前,应了解与龋齿相关的风险:临床意义:提高家长和看护人对市场上各种奶粉致龋性的了解和认识:Mahanta A, Yadav G, Saha S, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of the Acidogenic Potential of Lactose-based, Soy-based, Protein Hydrolysate-based, and Iron-based Milk Formulas Based on Dental Plaque pH, Salivary pH, and Buffering Capacity:体内研究。Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):851-859.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Modeling Videos on Dental Anxiety of 3-6-year-old Children Requiring Treatment under Local Anesthesia: A Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial. An In Vivo Comparative Analysis of Pain Perception in Children Following Lidocaine Gel, Clove Oil, and Precooling for Intraoral Injections: A Pilot Study. An In Vivo Evaluation of Changes in Salivary pH in 3-9-year-old Children Using Chewing Gums (Xylitol) and Lollipops (Xylitol + Erythritol). Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation between Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Gel-based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Indirect Pulp Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1