Aim: To compare the efficacy of buccal infiltration (BI) and intraligamentary (IL) injection with 4% articaine in achieving anesthesia for pulp therapy in primary mandibular molars.
Materials and methods: A study was conducted in children aged between 4 and 8 years, whose primary mandibular molars were indicated for pulp therapy. Both injection procedures, IL and BI using articaine, were used in the same patient for bilateral pulp therapy of primary mandibular molars at an interval of 1 week appointments. Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale, Facial Image Scale (FIS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used to assess pain at the time of injection and at the time of pulp therapy. Statistical analysis was done using the Chi-square test, independent t-test, and paired t-test.
Results: Both IL and BI techniques using 4% articaine serve as an alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with lignocaine.
Conclusion: BI was less painful and more comfortable in patients at and during the time of pulp therapy when compared to IL injection.
How to cite this article: Saket A, Gupta S, Pandey P, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration and Intraligamentary Injection with 4% Articaine in Primary Molars: In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2026;19(1):8-12.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
