Do social media epistemological beliefs and health perception impact parents' vaccine hesitancy? A mediation analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1177/17579759241270956
Cahide Çevik, Ebru Yavuz, Fatma Çakmak, Reyhan Ündere, Asiye Doğan Cengiz
{"title":"Do social media epistemological beliefs and health perception impact parents' vaccine hesitancy? A mediation analysis.","authors":"Cahide Çevik, Ebru Yavuz, Fatma Çakmak, Reyhan Ündere, Asiye Doğan Cengiz","doi":"10.1177/17579759241270956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been a notable increase in vaccine hesitancy among individuals. It is crucial to identify the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy to effectively address this issue. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media-specific epistemological beliefs on vaccine hesitancy and the mediating role of health perception in this impact. This study is a cross-sectional study conducted with 444 parents. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Social Media-Specific Epistemological Beliefs Scale, the Perception of Health Scale, and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. When there is no mediator variable, the total effect of social media-specific epistemological beliefs on vaccine hesitancy is statistically significant (β = -0.219, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, it was found that health perception did not mediate the relationship between social media-specific epistemological beliefs and vaccine hesitancy (β = 0.0038, 95% confidence interval (-0.0090, 0.0205)). Furthermore, it was determined that social media-specific epistemological beliefs positively predicted health perception (β = 0.136, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Health perception was found to have no significant effect on vaccine hesitancy (β = 0.028, <i>p</i> > 0.05). It can be concluded that social media-specific epistemological beliefs negatively predict vaccine hesitancy, and this effect is independent of health perception. Primary healthcare professionals should consider incorporating interventions aimed at enhancing individuals' social media-specific epistemological beliefs into their health education programs related to vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"17579759241270956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241270956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in vaccine hesitancy among individuals. It is crucial to identify the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy to effectively address this issue. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media-specific epistemological beliefs on vaccine hesitancy and the mediating role of health perception in this impact. This study is a cross-sectional study conducted with 444 parents. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Social Media-Specific Epistemological Beliefs Scale, the Perception of Health Scale, and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. When there is no mediator variable, the total effect of social media-specific epistemological beliefs on vaccine hesitancy is statistically significant (β = -0.219, p < 0.001). However, it was found that health perception did not mediate the relationship between social media-specific epistemological beliefs and vaccine hesitancy (β = 0.0038, 95% confidence interval (-0.0090, 0.0205)). Furthermore, it was determined that social media-specific epistemological beliefs positively predicted health perception (β = 0.136, p < 0.01). Health perception was found to have no significant effect on vaccine hesitancy (β = 0.028, p > 0.05). It can be concluded that social media-specific epistemological beliefs negatively predict vaccine hesitancy, and this effect is independent of health perception. Primary healthcare professionals should consider incorporating interventions aimed at enhancing individuals' social media-specific epistemological beliefs into their health education programs related to vaccines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体的认识论信念和健康观念会影响家长的疫苗接种犹豫吗?中介分析。
近年来,个人对疫苗犹豫不决的情况明显增多。为有效解决这一问题,找出导致疫苗犹豫不决的因素至关重要。本研究旨在探讨社交媒体特有的认识论信念对疫苗接种犹豫不决的影响,以及健康认知在这一影响中的中介作用。本研究是一项横断面研究,共有 444 名家长参与。使用个人信息表、社交媒体特定认识论信念量表、健康感知量表和疫苗犹豫量表收集数据。在没有中介变量的情况下,社交媒体特定认识论信念对疫苗接种犹豫的总效应具有统计学意义(β = -0.219,p p > 0.05)。由此可以得出结论,社交媒体特有的认识论信念会对疫苗接种犹豫产生负面影响,而且这种影响与健康认知无关。初级医疗保健专业人员应考虑在与疫苗有关的健康教育计划中纳入旨在增强个人社交媒体特定认识论信念的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Validación de un instrumento para identificar las conductas promotoras de salud en estudiantes universitarios. Vers une approche systémique de la santé à l'école : travailler les conditions et leviers de déploiement. Galvanising social innovation in gambling harms reduction: a process evaluation of a multi-component Community of Practice. A theoretical analysis of professionalism in health promotion with a focus on the Swiss context. Addressing current challenges in population health intervention research for health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1