The intersection of substance use stigma and anti-Black racial stigma: A scoping review

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104612
Rashmi Ghonasgi , Maria E. Paschke , Rachel P. Winograd , Catherine Wright , Eva Selph , Devin E. Banks
{"title":"The intersection of substance use stigma and anti-Black racial stigma: A scoping review","authors":"Rashmi Ghonasgi ,&nbsp;Maria E. Paschke ,&nbsp;Rachel P. Winograd ,&nbsp;Catherine Wright ,&nbsp;Eva Selph ,&nbsp;Devin E. Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Substance use stigma poses a barrier to treatment and recovery from substance use disorder. Stigma is amplified when intersecting with other stigmatized identities, particularly Black racial identity. Despite increasing attention to the intersecting roles of racial and substance use stigma, it is unknown how these stigmas interact to impact treatment and health outcomes among Black people who use drugs. This scoping review examines empirical research documenting differential impacts of race and racism on substance use stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PsychInfo and PubMed databases. Eligible studies were conducted in the U.S.; examined a Black sample, subsample, or experimental condition/variable (i.e., in a vignette); and measured substance use stigma (excluding alcohol or nicotine). Qualitative studies describing a theme related to substance use stigma were also included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1431 unique results, 22 articles met inclusion criteria. The most measured substance use stigma type was interpersonal (e.g., discrimination). Most quantitative findings (<em>n</em> = 15) suggested that Black members of the general public endorse less substance use stigma and Black people who use drugs face less substance use stigma relative to their White counterparts. Qualitative studies (<em>n</em> = 7) suggested stigma was a more common and pernicious substance use treatment barrier for Black people compared to White. Across methods, racial prejudice was associated with substance use stigma, supporting hegemonic ideas that substance use is stereotypically characteristic of Black people.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The interaction between substance use stigma and race is complex and varies by in-group and out-group raters as a function of racial identity and identity as a person who uses drugs. Contradictory findings reflect methodological differences, emphasizing the need for more unified measurement of substance use stigma. More research is needed among Black people who use drugs to improve understanding of the impact of these intersecting stigmas on racial inequities in substance use treatment, morbidity, and mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104612"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Substance use stigma poses a barrier to treatment and recovery from substance use disorder. Stigma is amplified when intersecting with other stigmatized identities, particularly Black racial identity. Despite increasing attention to the intersecting roles of racial and substance use stigma, it is unknown how these stigmas interact to impact treatment and health outcomes among Black people who use drugs. This scoping review examines empirical research documenting differential impacts of race and racism on substance use stigma.

Methods

We systematically searched PsychInfo and PubMed databases. Eligible studies were conducted in the U.S.; examined a Black sample, subsample, or experimental condition/variable (i.e., in a vignette); and measured substance use stigma (excluding alcohol or nicotine). Qualitative studies describing a theme related to substance use stigma were also included.

Results

Of 1431 unique results, 22 articles met inclusion criteria. The most measured substance use stigma type was interpersonal (e.g., discrimination). Most quantitative findings (n = 15) suggested that Black members of the general public endorse less substance use stigma and Black people who use drugs face less substance use stigma relative to their White counterparts. Qualitative studies (n = 7) suggested stigma was a more common and pernicious substance use treatment barrier for Black people compared to White. Across methods, racial prejudice was associated with substance use stigma, supporting hegemonic ideas that substance use is stereotypically characteristic of Black people.

Conclusions

The interaction between substance use stigma and race is complex and varies by in-group and out-group raters as a function of racial identity and identity as a person who uses drugs. Contradictory findings reflect methodological differences, emphasizing the need for more unified measurement of substance use stigma. More research is needed among Black people who use drugs to improve understanding of the impact of these intersecting stigmas on racial inequities in substance use treatment, morbidity, and mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物使用污名化与反黑人种族污名化的交叉:范围审查。
背景:药物使用污名化对药物使用障碍的治疗和康复构成了障碍。当污名与其他被污名化的身份(尤其是黑人种族身份)交织在一起时,污名就会被放大。尽管种族鄙视和药物使用鄙视的交叉作用日益受到关注,但这些鄙视是如何相互作用影响吸毒黑人的治疗和健康结果的,目前还不得而知。本范围界定综述研究了记录种族和种族主义对药物使用成见的不同影响的实证研究:我们系统地检索了 PsychInfo 和 PubMed 数据库。符合条件的研究均在美国进行;研究了黑人样本、子样本或实验条件/变量(即小故事);并测量了药物使用耻辱感(不包括酒精或尼古丁)。此外,还包括描述与药物使用羞辱相关主题的定性研究:在 1431 项独特的结果中,有 22 篇文章符合纳入标准。衡量最多的药物使用羞辱类型是人际羞辱(如歧视)。大多数定量研究结果(n = 15)表明,与白人相比,一般公众中的黑人成员认可的药物使用成见较少,使用毒品的黑人面临的药物使用成见也较少。定性研究(n = 7)表明,与白人相比,成见对黑人来说是一种更常见、更有害的药物使用治疗障碍。在各种方法中,种族偏见与药物使用成见相关,支持了药物使用是黑人刻板印象的霸权思想:药物滥用成见与种族之间的相互作用是复杂的,并且由于种族身份和吸毒者身份的不同,群体内和群体外的评价者也各不相同。相互矛盾的研究结果反映了方法上的差异,强调了对药物使用耻辱感进行更统一测量的必要性。需要在吸毒黑人中开展更多研究,以更好地了解这些相互交织的污名对药物使用治疗、发病率和死亡率方面种族不平等的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1