A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2405572

Tamara Wanklyn, Kate E Webster, Yvonne Mak-Yuen, Zona Rens, Debbie Boey, Anoo Bhopti, Claire Dalliston, Leeanne M Carey

{"title":"A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities.","authors":"Tamara Wanklyn, Kate E Webster, Yvonne Mak-Yuen, Zona Rens, Debbie Boey, Anoo Bhopti, Claire Dalliston, Leeanne M Carey","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2405572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To summarise information about tools available to rate observed performance in activities, tested with populations with upper limb impairment.Methods and materials: A scoping review was conducted. Articles were included if they reported psychometric properties of tools that could be used with populations with upper limb impairment, had at least one activity item, and item/s involved use of the upper limbs. Information about the tools was extracted, summarised and key findings are presented.Results: Twenty-seven tools met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that few tools used client-selected (19%) items or clinician-selected (11%) items. Most tools (70%) used pre-defined items. Fourteen tools (52%) included activity-only items. Eleven tools (41%) had less than half activity items. An in-depth summary of the tools with activity-only items is reported.Conclusion: Many tools exist for assessing observed performance in activities to examine use of the upper limb. However, there were few tools (N = 6) available that assess observed performance in client-selected activities.","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2405572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To summarise information about tools available to rate observed performance in activities, tested with populations with upper limb impairment.

Methods and materials: A scoping review was conducted. Articles were included if they reported psychometric properties of tools that could be used with populations with upper limb impairment, had at least one activity item, and item/s involved use of the upper limbs. Information about the tools was extracted, summarised and key findings are presented.

Results: Twenty-seven tools met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that few tools used client-selected (19%) items or clinician-selected (11%) items. Most tools (70%) used pre-defined items. Fourteen tools (52%) included activity-only items. Eleven tools (41%) had less than half activity items. An in-depth summary of the tools with activity-only items is reported.

Conclusion: Many tools exist for assessing observed performance in activities to examine use of the upper limb. However, there were few tools (N = 6) available that assess observed performance in client-selected activities.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

以观察为基础的上肢活动评估工具范围综述。

目的：总结有关现有工具的信息，这些工具可用于评定观察到的活动表现，并在上肢受损人群中进行测试：进行了范围界定审查。如果文章报道了可用于上肢受损人群的工具的心理测量特性，至少有一个活动项目，且项目/项目涉及上肢的使用，则文章被纳入其中。对工具的相关信息进行了提取、总结，并介绍了主要发现：结果：27 种工具符合纳入标准。结果表明，很少有工具使用客户自选项目（19%）或临床医生自选项目（11%）。大多数工具（70%）使用预先定义的项目。14种工具（52%）只包含活动项目。11种工具（41%）的活动项目不足一半。报告对只包含活动项目的工具进行了深入总结：现有许多工具可用于评估观察到的活动表现，以检查上肢的使用情况。然而，很少有工具（N = 6）可用于评估客户自选活动中的观察表现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

9.10%

发文量

415

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.