Family-Centered Care and Collaboration: A Scoping Review of Medical Guidance for Parental Substance Use.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.163
Julia A Najm, Charlotte E Bausha, Logan V Paluch, Julia R Frew, Erin R Barnett
{"title":"Family-Centered Care and Collaboration: A Scoping Review of Medical Guidance for Parental Substance Use.","authors":"Julia A Najm, Charlotte E Bausha, Logan V Paluch, Julia R Frew, Erin R Barnett","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of U.S. families are affected by substance use disorders. Both child- and adult- serving systems are called upon to care for families, yet the disciplines involved inherently have different priorities, preventing a true family-centered care model.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of the scoping review was to explore the alignment of current national guidance related to the medical care of families affected by substance use disorders (SUD). In the review, we examined 1) the quality of the documents, 2) the documents' positions within the continuum of family-centered care and the promotion of multidisciplinary collaboration, and 3) potential gaps in the promotion of services for families.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>We chose a priori to manually examine the websites of national medical and public health associations for clinical practice and policy recommendations. We included documents published between 2016-2023 with selected keywords, totaling seven documents for review. We operationalized and rated each document's recommendations based on their promotion of \"family-centered care\" and \"multidisciplinary collaboration.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality of each document varied, with an average score of 5.2 out of 7. The average family-centeredness rating was 3.0 out of 7; five of the seven documents prioritized the parent's care over the child's. The average multidisciplinary collaboration rating was 2.8 out of 7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications of key findings: </strong>Overall, we found low to moderate family-centered and multidisciplinary collaboration scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that despite these practices emerging as optimal for the care of families affected by SUD, the promotion of these practices has yet to be fully adopted in guidance statements by national medical disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of U.S. families are affected by substance use disorders. Both child- and adult- serving systems are called upon to care for families, yet the disciplines involved inherently have different priorities, preventing a true family-centered care model.

Objectives: The purpose of the scoping review was to explore the alignment of current national guidance related to the medical care of families affected by substance use disorders (SUD). In the review, we examined 1) the quality of the documents, 2) the documents' positions within the continuum of family-centered care and the promotion of multidisciplinary collaboration, and 3) potential gaps in the promotion of services for families.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: We chose a priori to manually examine the websites of national medical and public health associations for clinical practice and policy recommendations. We included documents published between 2016-2023 with selected keywords, totaling seven documents for review. We operationalized and rated each document's recommendations based on their promotion of "family-centered care" and "multidisciplinary collaboration."

Results: The quality of each document varied, with an average score of 5.2 out of 7. The average family-centeredness rating was 3.0 out of 7; five of the seven documents prioritized the parent's care over the child's. The average multidisciplinary collaboration rating was 2.8 out of 7.

Conclusions and implications of key findings: Overall, we found low to moderate family-centered and multidisciplinary collaboration scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that despite these practices emerging as optimal for the care of families affected by SUD, the promotion of these practices has yet to be fully adopted in guidance statements by national medical disciplines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以家庭为中心的护理与合作:以家庭为中心的护理与合作:父母药物使用医疗指南范围综述》。
背景:美国有很大一部分家庭受到药物使用障碍的影响。儿童和成人服务系统都被要求为家庭提供护理,但所涉及的学科在本质上有不同的优先事项,因此无法形成真正以家庭为中心的护理模式:此次范围界定审查的目的是探索与受药物使用障碍(SUD)影响的家庭的医疗护理相关的现行国家指导的一致性。在综述中,我们检查了:1)文件的质量;2)文件在以家庭为中心的连续性护理和促进多学科合作中的地位;3)在促进家庭服务方面的潜在差距:我们事先选择手动检查国家医疗和公共卫生协会的网站,以获取临床实践和政策建议。我们收录了 2016-2023 年间发表的带有选定关键词的文献,共计 7 篇文献供审阅。我们根据每份文件对 "以家庭为中心的护理 "和 "多学科合作 "的促进作用对其建议进行了操作和评分:以家庭为中心 "的平均评分为 3.0 分(满分为 7 分);7 份文件中有 5 份将家长的护理放在了首位。多学科合作的平均评分为 2.8 分(满分 7 分):总体而言,我们发现以家庭为中心和多学科协作的得分处于中下水平。总之,这些发现表明,尽管这些做法被认为是护理受 SUD 影响的家庭的最佳方法,但这些做法的推广尚未被国家医学学科的指导声明完全采纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Variability in invasive bacterial infection proportions among febrile infants aged 8-90 days using administrative data. A Narrative Review of Key Studies in Medical Education in 2023: Applying the Current Literature to Educational Practice and Scholarship. My Father's Daughter and Doctor. Quality Initiative to Increase Early Initiation and Series Completion of HPV Vaccine and its Impact on Health Disparities. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Insufficient Sleep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1