Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on Medicare: Evidence from administrative data

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1002/pam.22647
Scott Barkowski, Dajung Jun, Yuting Zhang
{"title":"Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on Medicare: Evidence from administrative data","authors":"Scott Barkowski, Dajung Jun, Yuting Zhang","doi":"10.1002/pam.22647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 Medicaid expansion excluded Americans who were 65 years old and older, but they could still be affected via spillover effects. Using Medicare administrative data, we test for spillovers in Medicare spending and Medicaid coverage among low‐income Medicare beneficiaries. We analyze two cohorts: those under 65 in 2014, who could have been induced by the expansion to take up Medicaid before joining Medicare; and those 65 or older in 2014, whose Medicaid eligibility was never affected by the expansion. We only find spillovers for the under‐65 cohort, where Medicare spending fell and Medicaid coverage increased, with no measurable adverse effect on mortality. Combined with a null effect for the over‐65 cohort, these facts suggest Medicare beneficiaries were not crowded out of health care by the expansion. Instead, those under‐65 cohort satisfied “pent‐up” demand via Medicaid, consuming care they would have otherwise obtained later under Medicare.","PeriodicalId":48105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2014 Medicaid expansion excluded Americans who were 65 years old and older, but they could still be affected via spillover effects. Using Medicare administrative data, we test for spillovers in Medicare spending and Medicaid coverage among low‐income Medicare beneficiaries. We analyze two cohorts: those under 65 in 2014, who could have been induced by the expansion to take up Medicaid before joining Medicare; and those 65 or older in 2014, whose Medicaid eligibility was never affected by the expansion. We only find spillovers for the under‐65 cohort, where Medicare spending fell and Medicaid coverage increased, with no measurable adverse effect on mortality. Combined with a null effect for the over‐65 cohort, these facts suggest Medicare beneficiaries were not crowded out of health care by the expansion. Instead, those under‐65 cohort satisfied “pent‐up” demand via Medicaid, consuming care they would have otherwise obtained later under Medicare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助扩展对医疗保险的溢出效应:来自行政数据的证据
2014 年的医疗补助扩展将 65 岁及以上的美国人排除在外,但他们仍可能受到溢出效应的影响。利用医疗保险管理数据,我们对低收入医疗保险受益人的医疗保险支出和医疗补助覆盖范围的溢出效应进行了检验。我们分析了两个组群:2014 年 65 岁以下的人群,他们可能会在加入医疗保险之前受医疗保险扩展的影响而加入医疗补助计划;以及 2014 年 65 岁或以上的人群,他们的医疗补助资格从未受到医疗保险扩展的影响。我们只发现了 65 岁以下人群的溢出效应,他们的医疗保险支出下降,医疗补助计划的覆盖范围扩大,但对死亡率没有明显的不利影响。再加上对 65 岁以上人群的影响为零,这些事实表明,医疗保险受益人并没有因为医保扩容而被挤出医保范围。相反,这些 65 岁以下的人群通过医疗补助计划满足了 "被压抑 "的需求,消费了他们本应在以后通过医疗保险计划获得的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: This journal encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.
期刊最新文献
Veteran Affairs disability compensation: Likely the U.S.’s largest disability program, but what do we know about its impacts on service-disabled veterans? The dovish turnaround: Germany's social benefit reform and job findings To make or buy commercialization: A synthetic control approach Spillover effects of Medicaid expansion on Medicare: Evidence from administrative data Correction to BOOK REVIEW: Why SNAP Works: A Political History—and Defense—of the Food Stamp Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1