Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Genome Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1186/s13059-024-03400-w
Zijie Zhao, Tim Gruenloh, Meiyi Yan, Yixuan Wu, Zhongxuan Sun, Jiacheng Miao, Yuchang Wu, Jie Song, Qiongshi Lu
{"title":"Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics","authors":"Zijie Zhao, Tim Gruenloh, Meiyi Yan, Yixuan Wu, Zhongxuan Sun, Jiacheng Miao, Yuchang Wu, Jie Song, Qiongshi Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13059-024-03400-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polygenic risk score (PRS) is a major research topic in human genetics. However, a significant gap exists between PRS methodology and applications in practice due to often unavailable individual-level data for various PRS tasks including model fine-tuning, benchmarking, and ensemble learning. We introduce an innovative statistical framework to optimize and benchmark PRS models using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. This framework builds upon our previous work and can fine-tune virtually all existing PRS models while accounting for linkage disequilibrium. In addition, we provide an ensemble learning strategy named PUMAS-ensemble to combine multiple PRS models into an ensemble score without requiring external data for model fitting. Through extensive simulations and analysis of many complex traits in the UK Biobank, we demonstrate that this approach closely approximates gold-standard analytical strategies based on external validation, and substantially outperforms state-of-the-art PRS methods. Our method is a powerful and general modeling technique that can continue to combine the best-performing PRS methods out there through ensemble learning and could become an integral component for all future PRS applications.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03400-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygenic risk score (PRS) is a major research topic in human genetics. However, a significant gap exists between PRS methodology and applications in practice due to often unavailable individual-level data for various PRS tasks including model fine-tuning, benchmarking, and ensemble learning. We introduce an innovative statistical framework to optimize and benchmark PRS models using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. This framework builds upon our previous work and can fine-tune virtually all existing PRS models while accounting for linkage disequilibrium. In addition, we provide an ensemble learning strategy named PUMAS-ensemble to combine multiple PRS models into an ensemble score without requiring external data for model fitting. Through extensive simulations and analysis of many complex traits in the UK Biobank, we demonstrate that this approach closely approximates gold-standard analytical strategies based on external validation, and substantially outperforms state-of-the-art PRS methods. Our method is a powerful and general modeling technique that can continue to combine the best-performing PRS methods out there through ensemble learning and could become an integral component for all future PRS applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 GWAS 概要统计优化多基因风险评分并制定基准
多基因风险评分(PRS)是人类遗传学的一个重要研究课题。然而,由于各种 PRS 任务(包括模型微调、基准测试和集合学习)通常无法获得个体水平的数据,PRS 方法与实际应用之间存在着巨大的差距。我们引入了一个创新的统计框架,利用全基因组关联研究的汇总统计数据对 PRS 模型进行优化和基准测试。该框架以我们之前的工作为基础,可以对几乎所有现有的 PRS 模型进行微调,同时考虑到连锁不平衡。此外,我们还提供了一种名为 PUMAS-ensemble 的集合学习策略,可将多个 PRS 模型合并为一个集合得分,而无需外部数据进行模型拟合。通过对英国生物库中的许多复杂性状进行大量模拟和分析,我们证明这种方法非常接近基于外部验证的黄金标准分析策略,并大大优于最先进的 PRS 方法。我们的方法是一种功能强大的通用建模技术,它可以通过集合学习继续将表现最好的 PRS 方法结合起来,并可能成为未来所有 PRS 应用不可或缺的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category. Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical annotation of eQTLs by H-eQTL enables identification of genes with cell type-divergent regulation Publisher Correction: Tagging large CNV blocks in wheat boosts digitalization of germplasm resources by ultra-low-coverage sequencing The genomic portrait of the Picene culture provides new insights into the Italic Iron Age and the legacy of the Roman Empire in Central Italy scStateDynamics: deciphering the drug-responsive tumor cell state dynamics by modeling single-cell level expression changes Considerations in the search for epistasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1