Toxoplasma qPCR kinetics to guide pre-emptive treatment of toxoplasmosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae488
Robina Aerts, Alienor Xhaard, Christine Robin, Andreas H Groll, Catherine Cordonnier, Katrien Lagrou, Stéphane Bretagne
{"title":"Toxoplasma qPCR kinetics to guide pre-emptive treatment of toxoplasmosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","authors":"Robina Aerts, Alienor Xhaard, Christine Robin, Andreas H Groll, Catherine Cordonnier, Katrien Lagrou, Stéphane Bretagne","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Recent ECIL-guidelines recommend a quantitative PCR (qPCR) guided pre-emptive treatment approach to toxoplasmosis in seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). While qPCR might serve as a sensitive tool for early Toxoplasma detection, its role in treatment follow-up remains unknown. Methods We analyzed the qPCR kinetics of allo-HCT recipients experiencing either Toxoplasma infection (TI, n=71) or disease (TD, n=14) in relation to different parameters. We included 85 patients with available qPCR values expressed as quantitative cycle (Cq) from four large hematological centers from 2009 to 2023, and kinetic analysis was performed in a selection of 74 patients screened at least weekly with blood qPCR. Day 0 (D0) was the day of anti-Toxoplasma treatment start or (when untreated) day of diagnosis. Results Time to qPCR negativity was inversely proportional to the Cq value at D0 (p=0.0063). Not reaching negativity at D10 was associated with a significantly higher mortality at D30 (p=0.023). Patients with a high D0-parasitic load and patients with TD showed slower clearance (p<0.001, p=0.032). Time to negativity was not significantly different for patients started on prophylactic vs curative doses as first-line treatment regimen (p=0.16). Conclusions This study underscores the predictive value of qPCR kinetics monitoring in allo-HCT patients with toxoplasmosis. With the aforementioned risk factors, clinicians can identify patients at high-risk for worse outcome. Our results support to consider a therapeutic change or reinforcement if the parasitic load does not decrease after 10 days, supplementing existing clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Recent ECIL-guidelines recommend a quantitative PCR (qPCR) guided pre-emptive treatment approach to toxoplasmosis in seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). While qPCR might serve as a sensitive tool for early Toxoplasma detection, its role in treatment follow-up remains unknown. Methods We analyzed the qPCR kinetics of allo-HCT recipients experiencing either Toxoplasma infection (TI, n=71) or disease (TD, n=14) in relation to different parameters. We included 85 patients with available qPCR values expressed as quantitative cycle (Cq) from four large hematological centers from 2009 to 2023, and kinetic analysis was performed in a selection of 74 patients screened at least weekly with blood qPCR. Day 0 (D0) was the day of anti-Toxoplasma treatment start or (when untreated) day of diagnosis. Results Time to qPCR negativity was inversely proportional to the Cq value at D0 (p=0.0063). Not reaching negativity at D10 was associated with a significantly higher mortality at D30 (p=0.023). Patients with a high D0-parasitic load and patients with TD showed slower clearance (p<0.001, p=0.032). Time to negativity was not significantly different for patients started on prophylactic vs curative doses as first-line treatment regimen (p=0.16). Conclusions This study underscores the predictive value of qPCR kinetics monitoring in allo-HCT patients with toxoplasmosis. With the aforementioned risk factors, clinicians can identify patients at high-risk for worse outcome. Our results support to consider a therapeutic change or reinforcement if the parasitic load does not decrease after 10 days, supplementing existing clinical guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用弓形虫 qPCR 动力学指导同种异体造血干细胞移植后弓形虫病的预防性治疗
背景 最近的 ECIL 指南建议对异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)血清阳性受者的弓形虫病采用定量 PCR(qPCR)指导的先期治疗方法。虽然 qPCR 可作为早期检测弓形虫的灵敏工具,但其在治疗随访中的作用仍不清楚。方法 我们分析了发生弓形虫感染(TI,71 例)或疾病(TD,14 例)的异体造血干细胞移植受者的 qPCR 动力学与不同参数的关系。我们纳入了 2009 年至 2023 年期间来自四个大型血液学中心的 85 名患者,这些患者的 qPCR 值以定量周期(Cq)表示,我们还选择了至少每周进行一次血液 qPCR 筛查的 74 名患者进行动力学分析。第 0 天(D0)为开始抗弓形虫治疗的当天或(未治疗时)诊断当天。结果 qPCR 阴性时间与 D0 时的 Cq 值成反比(p=0.0063)。D10时未达到阴性与D30时死亡率显著升高有关(p=0.023)。D0寄生虫量高的患者和TD患者的清除速度较慢(p<0.001,p=0.032)。作为一线治疗方案,开始使用预防性剂量与治疗性剂量的患者出现阴性的时间没有明显差异(p=0.16)。结论 本研究强调了 qPCR 动力学监测在弓形虫病异体肝移植患者中的预测价值。通过上述风险因素,临床医生可以识别出预后较差的高风险患者。如果寄生虫载量在 10 天后仍未下降,我们的研究结果支持考虑改变治疗方法或加强治疗,这也是对现有临床指南的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Alleviation of COVID-19 Symptoms and Reduction in Healthcare Utilization Among High-Risk Patients Treated With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (NMV/R): A phase 3 randomized trial Efficacy and Safety of Systematic Corticosteroids treatment among HIV-Positive Patients with Tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials OPAT and Severe Sepsis Mortality. Diagnostic accuracy of TB screening tests in a prospective multinational cohort: Chest-X-ray with computer-aided detection, Xpert TB host response, and C-reactive protein Differences in Trends in Cancer Incidence Rates Among People with HIV during 2001–2019 By Race and Ethnicity and By Risk Group in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1