Daewon Koo, Navdeep Godara, Juan R. Romero Cubas, Shawn D. Askew
{"title":"A method to spatially assess multipass spray deposition patterns via UV fluorescence and weed population shifts","authors":"Daewon Koo, Navdeep Godara, Juan R. Romero Cubas, Shawn D. Askew","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spray deposition patterns from agricultural sprayers are traditionally sampled discretely along a field transect accounting for 0.5% or less of the treated area. Such methods may not fully capture the dimensional variability inherent in large‐scale, multiple‐pass spray applications, especially evident from an agricultural spray drone (ASD). This study investigated the utilization of UV‐fluorescent dye and nighttime aerial imaging techniques to assess large‐scale, multipass spray deposition patterns. Accuracy of digital hue from UV‐fluorescent photography to predict deposition of proxy dye was confirmed via fluorometry assessed intensity levels of extracted UV‐fluorescent dye from 384 Petri dishes placed prior to treatment. Results showed that ASD applications, regardless of nozzle type, exhibited greater spatial variability within the target area compared to ride‐on sprayer applications, primarily due to overapplication. Additionally, the ASD generated spray drift to adjacent nontarget areas that was at least three times more than that of ride‐on and spray‐gun sprayers. Multipass deposition was further assessed via in situ smooth crabgrass infestation following treatment with quinclorac or topramezone by multipass ASD or hand‐held, four‐nozzle spray boom. Weed infestation annotated from overlaid grids with 9.3‐dm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> ground resolution inconsistently detected spatial heterogeneity between transects assessed along the center and edge of each sprayer pass. The ASD controlled smooth crabgrass 11% more than the hand‐held sprayer, albeit with an 18% increase in spray drift to nontarget areas, similar to the UV‐fluorescence study. Digitally assessed average hue of fluorescence photography appears to be a viable method to assess multidimensional and continuous spatial relationships of spray deposition.","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spray deposition patterns from agricultural sprayers are traditionally sampled discretely along a field transect accounting for 0.5% or less of the treated area. Such methods may not fully capture the dimensional variability inherent in large‐scale, multiple‐pass spray applications, especially evident from an agricultural spray drone (ASD). This study investigated the utilization of UV‐fluorescent dye and nighttime aerial imaging techniques to assess large‐scale, multipass spray deposition patterns. Accuracy of digital hue from UV‐fluorescent photography to predict deposition of proxy dye was confirmed via fluorometry assessed intensity levels of extracted UV‐fluorescent dye from 384 Petri dishes placed prior to treatment. Results showed that ASD applications, regardless of nozzle type, exhibited greater spatial variability within the target area compared to ride‐on sprayer applications, primarily due to overapplication. Additionally, the ASD generated spray drift to adjacent nontarget areas that was at least three times more than that of ride‐on and spray‐gun sprayers. Multipass deposition was further assessed via in situ smooth crabgrass infestation following treatment with quinclorac or topramezone by multipass ASD or hand‐held, four‐nozzle spray boom. Weed infestation annotated from overlaid grids with 9.3‐dm2 ground resolution inconsistently detected spatial heterogeneity between transects assessed along the center and edge of each sprayer pass. The ASD controlled smooth crabgrass 11% more than the hand‐held sprayer, albeit with an 18% increase in spray drift to nontarget areas, similar to the UV‐fluorescence study. Digitally assessed average hue of fluorescence photography appears to be a viable method to assess multidimensional and continuous spatial relationships of spray deposition.
期刊介绍:
Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.