Saehee Kang,Joo Hun Han,In-Sue Oh,Chad Van Iddekinge,Junting Li
{"title":"Do human resource systems indeed have \"system\" effects? The dual internal fit model of a high-performance work system.","authors":"Saehee Kang,Joo Hun Han,In-Sue Oh,Chad Van Iddekinge,Junting Li","doi":"10.1037/apl0001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The configurational or \"internal fit\" perspective proposes that human resource (HR) systems are most effective when individual practices are configured such that they fit together and are mutually reinforcing. The Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) model has emerged as a predominant way to select and configure HR practices based on whether they attempt to enhance employee ability, motivation, or opportunities. Despite the widespread use of the configurational perspective and AMO model in building a high-performance work system (HPWS), researchers have not clearly articulated how HR practices across the AMO domains should be configured to maximize internal fit across the system. Moreover, research has overlooked the hierarchical nature of an HPWS, such that HR practices are nested within a particular AMO domain, and the AMO domains, in turn, are nested within the HPWS. To address these gaps, we develop and test a dual internal fit model that specifies synergistic interactions within and among AMO domains. Analyses of six-wave panel data from 640 firms reveal that internal fit effects of HR practices simultaneously exist within (i.e., HR practice-level interactions) and among AMO domains (i.e., AMO domain-level interactions) to predict workforce productivity and ultimately firm profitability. Moreover, the two sets of interactions predict outcomes beyond the additive effects of the HR practices on which prior research has typically focused. These findings show that HR practices can be configured to have \"system\" effects. They also highlight the value of the dual internal fit model to understand the performance benefits of optimally configured HR systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The configurational or "internal fit" perspective proposes that human resource (HR) systems are most effective when individual practices are configured such that they fit together and are mutually reinforcing. The Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) model has emerged as a predominant way to select and configure HR practices based on whether they attempt to enhance employee ability, motivation, or opportunities. Despite the widespread use of the configurational perspective and AMO model in building a high-performance work system (HPWS), researchers have not clearly articulated how HR practices across the AMO domains should be configured to maximize internal fit across the system. Moreover, research has overlooked the hierarchical nature of an HPWS, such that HR practices are nested within a particular AMO domain, and the AMO domains, in turn, are nested within the HPWS. To address these gaps, we develop and test a dual internal fit model that specifies synergistic interactions within and among AMO domains. Analyses of six-wave panel data from 640 firms reveal that internal fit effects of HR practices simultaneously exist within (i.e., HR practice-level interactions) and among AMO domains (i.e., AMO domain-level interactions) to predict workforce productivity and ultimately firm profitability. Moreover, the two sets of interactions predict outcomes beyond the additive effects of the HR practices on which prior research has typically focused. These findings show that HR practices can be configured to have "system" effects. They also highlight the value of the dual internal fit model to understand the performance benefits of optimally configured HR systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
配置或 "内部契合 "观点认为,人力资源(HR)系统最有效的方式是将各项实践配置在一起,使其相互配合、相互促进。能力-动机-机会(AMO)模型已成为根据人力资源实践是否试图提高员工能力、动机或机会来选择和配置人力资源实践的主要方法。尽管在构建高绩效工作系统(HPWS)的过程中,配置视角和 AMO 模型得到了广泛应用,但研究人员并没有明确阐述应如何配置 AMO 领域的人力资源实践,以最大限度地提高整个系统的内部契合度。此外,研究还忽视了 HPWS 的层次性,即人力资源实践嵌套在特定的 AMO 领域中,而 AMO 领域又嵌套在 HPWS 中。为了弥补这些不足,我们开发并测试了一个双重内部拟合模型,该模型明确了 AMO 领域内部和之间的协同互动。对来自 640 家企业的六波面板数据的分析表明,人力资源实践的内部契合效应同时存在于 AMO 领域内部(即人力资源实践层面的相互作用)和 AMO 领域之间(即 AMO 领域层面的相互作用),从而预测劳动力生产率并最终预测企业盈利能力。此外,这两组相互作用对结果的预测超出了以往研究通常关注的人力资源实践的叠加效应。这些研究结果表明,人力资源实践的配置可以产生 "系统 "效应。这些研究结果还凸显了双重内部契合模型在理解优化配置的人力资源系统的绩效优势方面的价值。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including:
1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses).
2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research.
3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.