Sienna M. Durbin MD, Debra Lundquist PhD, RN, Andrea Pelletier MPH, Laura A. Petrillo MD, Viola Bame BS, Victoria Turbini MS, RN, Hope Heldreth BS, Kaitlyn Lynch BS, Mary Boulanger MD, Anh Lam DO, Casandra McIntyre BS, RN, MTS, Betty R. Ferrell PhD, RN, MA, CHPN, FAAN, FPCN, Rachel Jimenez MD, Dejan Juric MD, Ryan D. Nipp MD, MPH
{"title":"Financial toxicity in early-phase cancer clinical trial participants","authors":"Sienna M. Durbin MD, Debra Lundquist PhD, RN, Andrea Pelletier MPH, Laura A. Petrillo MD, Viola Bame BS, Victoria Turbini MS, RN, Hope Heldreth BS, Kaitlyn Lynch BS, Mary Boulanger MD, Anh Lam DO, Casandra McIntyre BS, RN, MTS, Betty R. Ferrell PhD, RN, MA, CHPN, FAAN, FPCN, Rachel Jimenez MD, Dejan Juric MD, Ryan D. Nipp MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Little is known about financial toxicity in early-phase clinical trial (EP-CT) participants. This study sought to describe financial toxicity in EP-CT participants and assess associations with patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospectively enrolled EP-CT participants from were followed from April 2021 through January 2023. Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (<26 = financial toxicity) at time of treatment. Quality of life (QOL), symptoms, coping, and resource concerns were surveyed. Associations of financial toxicity with patient characteristics, PROs, and clinical outcomes were explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 261 eligible patients, 197 completed baseline assessments (75.5%, median age = 63.4 years [31.8-88.6], 57.4% female). Most common cancers were gastrointestinal (33.0%) and breast (20.8%). More than one third (34.0%) of patients reported financial toxicity. Patients with financial toxicity were more likely to be <65 years (70.2% vs 48.5%, <i>p</i> = .004), unemployed (45.5% vs 16.9%, <i>p</i> < .001), not have attended college (53.1% vs 26.4%, <i>p</i> = .002), and have income <$60,000 (59.7% vs 25.4%, p < .001). In adjusted models, patients with financial toxicity reported lower QOL (B = –6.66, <i>p</i> = .004) and acceptance (B = –0.78, <i>p</i> = .002), and increased self-blame (B = 0.87, <i>p</i> < .001). They were more likely to have concerns regarding housing (10.6% vs 2.3%, <i>p</i> = .025), bills (31.8% vs 3.8%, <i>p</i> < .001), food (9.1% vs 0.8%, <i>p</i> = .006), and employment (21.2% vs 1.5%, <i>p</i> < .001). There was no difference in time on trial (hazard ratio, 1.03; <i>p</i> = .860) or survival (hazard ratio, 1.16; <i>p</i> = .496).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>More than one third of EP-CT participants reported financial toxicity. Factors associated with financial toxicity and demonstrated novel associations among financial toxicity with QOL, coping, and resource concerns were identified, highlighting the need to address financial toxicity among this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Little is known about financial toxicity in early-phase clinical trial (EP-CT) participants. This study sought to describe financial toxicity in EP-CT participants and assess associations with patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Methods
Prospectively enrolled EP-CT participants from were followed from April 2021 through January 2023. Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (<26 = financial toxicity) at time of treatment. Quality of life (QOL), symptoms, coping, and resource concerns were surveyed. Associations of financial toxicity with patient characteristics, PROs, and clinical outcomes were explored.
Results
Of 261 eligible patients, 197 completed baseline assessments (75.5%, median age = 63.4 years [31.8-88.6], 57.4% female). Most common cancers were gastrointestinal (33.0%) and breast (20.8%). More than one third (34.0%) of patients reported financial toxicity. Patients with financial toxicity were more likely to be <65 years (70.2% vs 48.5%, p = .004), unemployed (45.5% vs 16.9%, p < .001), not have attended college (53.1% vs 26.4%, p = .002), and have income <$60,000 (59.7% vs 25.4%, p < .001). In adjusted models, patients with financial toxicity reported lower QOL (B = –6.66, p = .004) and acceptance (B = –0.78, p = .002), and increased self-blame (B = 0.87, p < .001). They were more likely to have concerns regarding housing (10.6% vs 2.3%, p = .025), bills (31.8% vs 3.8%, p < .001), food (9.1% vs 0.8%, p = .006), and employment (21.2% vs 1.5%, p < .001). There was no difference in time on trial (hazard ratio, 1.03; p = .860) or survival (hazard ratio, 1.16; p = .496).
Conclusions
More than one third of EP-CT participants reported financial toxicity. Factors associated with financial toxicity and demonstrated novel associations among financial toxicity with QOL, coping, and resource concerns were identified, highlighting the need to address financial toxicity among this population.
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research