Ke Zhan, Yang Bai, Tianyu Liu, Xing Su, Qingqing Yang, Yang Liu, Xiangrong Zhou, Yichuan Zhang, Jianhua Tang, Zheng Jiang, Xin Yang, Weihui Liu
{"title":"Visual Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy Vs Antibiotic Therapy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.","authors":"Ke Zhan, Yang Bai, Tianyu Liu, Xing Su, Qingqing Yang, Yang Liu, Xiangrong Zhou, Yichuan Zhang, Jianhua Tang, Zheng Jiang, Xin Yang, Weihui Liu","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visual endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (V-ERAT) involves a single-use video scope, allowing for real-time visualization of the appendiceal lumen during the procedure to treat uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). This study aims to compare V-ERAT to antibiotic therapy in treating uncomplicated AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted at 9 hospitals in China from August 2021 to July 2023. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. A total of 692 uncomplicated AA patients were included, with 188 undergoing V-ERAT and 504 receiving antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was treatment success rate. The secondary outcomes included recurrent appendicitis rate, the appendectomy rate during the initial hospitalization, length of initial hospitalization, time to disease recurrence, and overall adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment success rate did not differ between the V-ERAT and antibiotic groups (93.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.1%-96.7% vs 90.5%; 95% CI, 87.6%-92.9%) ( P = 0.225). However, V-ERAT demonstrated a significantly lower risk of appendicitis recurrence compared with antibiotic therapy during the follow-up (log-rank P < 0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.07-0.29, P < 0.001). V-ERAT was associated with a lower appendectomy rate during the initial hospitalization (4.3%; 95% CI, 1.9%-8.2% vs 9.5%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.4%) ( P = 0.027), a shorter length of initial hospitalization (3 [interquartile range (IQR), 3-4] vs 4 [IQR, 4-6] days, P < 0.001), and a longer time to recurrence (269 [IQR, 210-318] vs 70 [IQR, 21-103] days, P < 0.001). The overall adverse event rates did not differ between the 2 groups (log-rank P = 0.064).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>V-ERAT seems to be a safe and effective alternative to antibiotic therapy in treating uncomplicated AA, significantly reducing the risk of appendicitis recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1036-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Visual endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (V-ERAT) involves a single-use video scope, allowing for real-time visualization of the appendiceal lumen during the procedure to treat uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). This study aims to compare V-ERAT to antibiotic therapy in treating uncomplicated AA.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted at 9 hospitals in China from August 2021 to July 2023. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. A total of 692 uncomplicated AA patients were included, with 188 undergoing V-ERAT and 504 receiving antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was treatment success rate. The secondary outcomes included recurrent appendicitis rate, the appendectomy rate during the initial hospitalization, length of initial hospitalization, time to disease recurrence, and overall adverse events.
Results: The treatment success rate did not differ between the V-ERAT and antibiotic groups (93.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.1%-96.7% vs 90.5%; 95% CI, 87.6%-92.9%) ( P = 0.225). However, V-ERAT demonstrated a significantly lower risk of appendicitis recurrence compared with antibiotic therapy during the follow-up (log-rank P < 0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.07-0.29, P < 0.001). V-ERAT was associated with a lower appendectomy rate during the initial hospitalization (4.3%; 95% CI, 1.9%-8.2% vs 9.5%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.4%) ( P = 0.027), a shorter length of initial hospitalization (3 [interquartile range (IQR), 3-4] vs 4 [IQR, 4-6] days, P < 0.001), and a longer time to recurrence (269 [IQR, 210-318] vs 70 [IQR, 21-103] days, P < 0.001). The overall adverse event rates did not differ between the 2 groups (log-rank P = 0.064).
Discussion: V-ERAT seems to be a safe and effective alternative to antibiotic therapy in treating uncomplicated AA, significantly reducing the risk of appendicitis recurrence.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.