Alveolar regeneration of the post-extraction site with cortical deficiency using the Lamina Socket Sealing technique: A retrospective study with clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric analysis. Part 1/2.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Alessia Felicetti, Piotr Wychowański, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona
{"title":"Alveolar regeneration of the post-extraction site with cortical deficiency using the Lamina Socket Sealing technique: A retrospective study with clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric analysis. Part 1/2.","authors":"Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Alessia Felicetti, Piotr Wychowański, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective observational study aims to evaluate the outcome of a new alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) technique, \"Lamina Socket Sealing\" (LSS) technique, using a porcine barrier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>36 subjects with maxillary premolars to be extracted and extensive alveolar wall defects were enrolled and treated. Porcine-derived barriers and mesenchymal membrane were used to seal the extraction socket with alveolar particulate graft. The outcome variables were: radiographical bone changes and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 subjects, 21 females and 15 males were treated. The change in mm (mean + SE) of horizontal ridge width from baseline to 4 months after surgery at the coronal level of the alveolus was +1.25 ± 0.20 mm (P< 0.05), mean level was +0.34 ± 0.1 mm (P< 0.05) and at the apical level was +0.08 ± 0.17 mm (P> 0.05) which was not statistically significant. The buccal and palatal height changes in mm (mean + SE) from baseline to 4 months after surgery were respectively 1.21 ± 0.17 mm for the buccal wall (P< 0.05) and 1.06 ± 0.24 mm for the palatal wall (P< 0.05). The bone volume of all sites allowed for the placement of the planned implants.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The alveolar ridge preservation technique (Lamina Socket Sealing) using resorbable heterologous cortical lamina with flapless approach allowed not only the preservation of the damaged post-extraction socket, but also minimal ridge augmentation, according to the principles of guided bone regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 SIA","pages":"4A-8A"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective observational study aims to evaluate the outcome of a new alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) technique, "Lamina Socket Sealing" (LSS) technique, using a porcine barrier.

Methods: 36 subjects with maxillary premolars to be extracted and extensive alveolar wall defects were enrolled and treated. Porcine-derived barriers and mesenchymal membrane were used to seal the extraction socket with alveolar particulate graft. The outcome variables were: radiographical bone changes and clinical outcomes.

Results: 36 subjects, 21 females and 15 males were treated. The change in mm (mean + SE) of horizontal ridge width from baseline to 4 months after surgery at the coronal level of the alveolus was +1.25 ± 0.20 mm (P< 0.05), mean level was +0.34 ± 0.1 mm (P< 0.05) and at the apical level was +0.08 ± 0.17 mm (P> 0.05) which was not statistically significant. The buccal and palatal height changes in mm (mean + SE) from baseline to 4 months after surgery were respectively 1.21 ± 0.17 mm for the buccal wall (P< 0.05) and 1.06 ± 0.24 mm for the palatal wall (P< 0.05). The bone volume of all sites allowed for the placement of the planned implants.

Clinical significance: The alveolar ridge preservation technique (Lamina Socket Sealing) using resorbable heterologous cortical lamina with flapless approach allowed not only the preservation of the damaged post-extraction socket, but also minimal ridge augmentation, according to the principles of guided bone regeneration.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用Lamina Socket Sealing技术实现牙槽骨再生:临床、放射学和组织形态学分析的回顾性研究。第 1/2 部分。
目的:这项回顾性观察研究旨在评估一种新的牙槽嵴保留(ARP)技术--使用猪屏障的 "牙槽窝密封"(LSS)技术--的效果。采用猪源屏障和间充质膜,用牙槽骨颗粒移植封闭拔牙窝。结果变量为:放射学骨质变化和临床结果:共有 36 名受试者接受了治疗,其中女性 21 人,男性 15 人。从基线到术后4个月,牙槽骨冠水平嵴宽度的变化(平均值+SE)为+1.25 ± 0.20 mm(P< 0.05),平均水平为+0.34 ± 0.1 mm(P< 0.05),牙尖水平为+0.08 ± 0.17 mm(P> 0.05),无统计学意义。从基线到术后 4 个月,颊侧壁和腭侧壁的高度变化分别为 1.21 ± 0.17 毫米(P< 0.05)和 1.06 ± 0.24 毫米(P< 0.05),单位为毫米(平均值 + SE)。所有部位的骨量都允许植入计划的种植体:临床意义:使用可吸收异源皮质薄片的牙槽嵴保存技术(Lamina Socket Sealing)采用无翻瓣方法,不仅可以保存拔牙后受损的牙槽嵴,还可以根据引导骨再生的原则进行最小化的牙槽嵴增量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite. Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy. Current landscape of research on whitening toothpastes and their effects on dental hard tissue. Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin. Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1