Prognostic Impact of Target Vessel in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Population-Based Cohort Study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.029
Emil Nielsen Holck MD, PhD , Lars Jakosen MD, PhD , Lone Juul-Hune Mogensen MSc , Ashkan Eftekhari MD, PhD , Evald Høj Christiansen MD, PhD
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Target Vessel in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Population-Based Cohort Study","authors":"Emil Nielsen Holck MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lars Jakosen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lone Juul-Hune Mogensen MSc ,&nbsp;Ashkan Eftekhari MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Evald Høj Christiansen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the coronary arteries in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with better outcome than unsuccessful PCI. Randomized data have not found invasive treatment of non-CTO LAD lesion to be associated with better outcome. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of CTO revascularization stratified on target treated vessel compared with non-CTO LAD PCI. The hypothesis was that successful PCI of LAD CTO and non-LAD CTO and unsuccessful non-LAD CTO were associated with the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD lesions, whereas patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO were associated with a poorer prognosis. The study was a population-based cohort study, including consecutive patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2019 in the Central Denmark Region. Patients with acute myocardial infarction within 30 days were excluded. Patients with CTO were stratified by occluded vessel and procedural success. The primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality and was calculated as a hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Secondary end points were myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization<strong>.</strong> In total, 21,141 patients were screened, 4,518 had non-CTO LAD PCI, and 1,475 had CTO PCI. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 5.8 years (3.6 to 8.8). In the successful CTO groups, the adjusted risk for all-cause mortality was equal to patients with non-CTO LAD (LAD CTO hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.14 [0.90 to 1.44], non-LAD CTO 1.09 [0.95 to 1.27]). Patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO had a higher risk than patients with non-CTO LAD, whereas unsuccessful non-LAD CTO had not (unsuccessful LAD 1.88 [1.33 to 2.65], unsuccessful non-LAD 1.26 [0.97 to 1.63]). In conclusion, successful LAD and non-LAD CTO PCI had the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD PCI, whereas only unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI had a poorer prognosis. Patients with LAD CTO are a high-risk population, and dedicated CTO trials are needed to confirm this finding and establish guideline recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"232 ","pages":"Pages 105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924007070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the coronary arteries in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with better outcome than unsuccessful PCI. Randomized data have not found invasive treatment of non-CTO LAD lesion to be associated with better outcome. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of CTO revascularization stratified on target treated vessel compared with non-CTO LAD PCI. The hypothesis was that successful PCI of LAD CTO and non-LAD CTO and unsuccessful non-LAD CTO were associated with the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD lesions, whereas patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO were associated with a poorer prognosis. The study was a population-based cohort study, including consecutive patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2019 in the Central Denmark Region. Patients with acute myocardial infarction within 30 days were excluded. Patients with CTO were stratified by occluded vessel and procedural success. The primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality and was calculated as a hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Secondary end points were myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. In total, 21,141 patients were screened, 4,518 had non-CTO LAD PCI, and 1,475 had CTO PCI. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 5.8 years (3.6 to 8.8). In the successful CTO groups, the adjusted risk for all-cause mortality was equal to patients with non-CTO LAD (LAD CTO hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.14 [0.90 to 1.44], non-LAD CTO 1.09 [0.95 to 1.27]). Patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO had a higher risk than patients with non-CTO LAD, whereas unsuccessful non-LAD CTO had not (unsuccessful LAD 1.88 [1.33 to 2.65], unsuccessful non-LAD 1.26 [0.97 to 1.63]). In conclusion, successful LAD and non-LAD CTO PCI had the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD PCI, whereas only unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI had a poorer prognosis. Patients with LAD CTO are a high-risk population, and dedicated CTO trials are needed to confirm this finding and establish guideline recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性完全闭塞症中靶血管的预后影响:基于人群的队列研究
与不成功的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,成功的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可改善左前降支动脉(LAD)慢性全闭塞(CTO)冠状动脉的预后。随机数据并未发现非CTO LAD病变的侵入性治疗与更好的预后相关。本研究旨在探讨与非闭塞性 LAD PCI 相比,根据目标治疗血管分层的 CTO 血管再通术对预后的影响。研究假设,成功的 LAD CTO 和非 LAD CTO PCI 以及不成功的非 LAD CTO 与非 CTO LAD 病变的预后相同,而不成功的 LAD CTO 患者预后较差。该研究是一项基于人群的队列研究,包括2009年至2019年在丹麦中部地区接受PCI治疗的连续患者。排除了30天内发生急性心肌梗死(MI)的患者。根据闭塞血管和手术成功率对CTO患者进行分层。主要终点是长期全因死亡率,以危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)计算。次要终点是心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。共有 21,141 名患者接受了筛查,4,518 名患者进行了非 CTO LAD PCI,1,475 名患者进行了 CTO PCI。随访中位数[IQR]为5.8[3.6;8.8]年。在CTO成功组中,调整后的全因死亡风险与非CTO LAD患者相同(LAD CTO HR (95% CI):1.14 (0.90;1.44),非LAD CTO:1.09 (0.95;1.27))。不成功的 LAD CTO 患者的风险高于非 CTO LAD 患者,而不成功的非 LAD CTO 患者的风险则不高(不成功的 LAD:1.88 (1.33;2.65);不成功的非 LAD:1.26 (0.97;1.63))。总之,成功的 LAD 和非 LAD CTO PCI 与非 CTO LAD PCI 的预后相同,只有不成功的 LAD CTO PCI 的预后较差。LAD CTO 患者是高危人群,需要专门的 CTO 试验来证实这一发现并制定指南建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Epinephrine for Refractory No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Evaluating Patients With Chest Pain Using the Recalibrated HEART Score and a Single High Sensitive Cardiac Troponin Measurement. Impact of Updated Invasive Right Ventricular and Pulmonary Hemodynamics on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Corrigendum to 'Non-Invasive Assessment of Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Relations: Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability and Assessment Across Heart Failure Subtypes' [American Journal of Cardiology 184 (2022) 48-55]. Acute Ascending Aortic Dissection Masquerading as a ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1