Relationship between Prices and Quality of Essential Medicines from Different Manufacturers Collected in Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Nigeria.

Abstract

Achieving universal access to affordable medicines and at the same time ensuring the quality of medicines presents a challenge, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Here, the relationship between medicine prices and medicine quality was investigated in three African countries. From different types of health facilities and medicine vendors, 711 samples of 18 different essential medicines were purchased and analyzed for quality (assay and dissolution) according to the United States Pharmacopeia. Without exception, all originator brand medicines and all SRA generics (generic medicines manufactured in countries with stringent regulatory authorities [SRAs]) complied with pharmacopeial specifications. In contrast, 21.1% of the non-SRA generics (manufactured in countries without SRAs) were substandard. The median prices of originator brands and SRA generics were three times and two times higher than those of non-SRA generics, respectively. Within the non-SRA generics, no positive correlation was observed between medicine quality and medicine price. Medicines manufactured in India, China, or African countries showed similar quality and similar prices. Only a single WHO-prequalified medicine sample was found among the 711 samples. Non-SRA generic medicines produced by manufacturers for which WHO had published Public Inspection Reports showed a significantly lower rate of substandard medicines (7.3%) and, at the same time, significantly lower prices (by 33%) than other non-SRA generics. Falsified medicines (total 2.0%) were found among all categories of medicines and had prices similar to those of non-SRA generics. Our findings indicate that adequate quality assurance does not necessarily imply an increase in medicine prices.