Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant?: A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16301-w
Alex Lee, Boaz Wong, Heidi Li, Elysia Grose, Olivier Brandts-Longtin, Katherine Aw, Rebecca Lau, Ahmad Abed, James Stevenson, Rahat Sheikh, Richard Chen, Clara Goulet, Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki, Carolyn Nessim
{"title":"Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant?: A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival.","authors":"Alex Lee, Boaz Wong, Heidi Li, Elysia Grose, Olivier Brandts-Longtin, Katherine Aw, Rebecca Lau, Ahmad Abed, James Stevenson, Rahat Sheikh, Richard Chen, Clara Goulet, Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki, Carolyn Nessim","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16301-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presence of positive biopsy margins in melanoma can provoke anxiety over potential disease progression from delays to surgical excision, but their impact on outcomes is unknown. We aimed to compare the presence of residual melanoma in the surgical excision specimen and survival between patients with negative, microscopically positive, and macroscopically positive biopsy margins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical excision over a 13-year period were included. Biopsy characteristics, residual disease in the surgical specimen, and overall and recurrence-free survival were compared between patients with negative, microscopically positive (only scar visible), and macroscopically positive (visible remaining melanoma) biopsy margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 901 patients, 42.4%, 33.3%, and 24.3% had negative, microscopically positive, and macroscopically positive margins, respectively. The incidence of residual invasive melanoma in the surgical specimen varied (P < 0.001), occurring in 5.5%, 17.0%, and 74.9% of patients, respectively. Both microscopically and macroscopically positive margins were associated with residual disease (P < 0.001) but only the latter predicted worse overall (P = 0.013) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.009). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was comparable between those with negative and microscopically positive margins, but overall (P = 0.006) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.004) were significantly worse in the macroscopically positive margin group. These patients had worse prognosis melanoma, with 33.8% being stage III disease, and 23.2% having positive sentinel lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and physicians may be reassured in the presence of microscopically positive biopsy margins which are not associated with worse survival, However, patients with macroscopically positive margins have poorer prognosis and should be treated within an acceptable time frame.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"474-481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16301-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Presence of positive biopsy margins in melanoma can provoke anxiety over potential disease progression from delays to surgical excision, but their impact on outcomes is unknown. We aimed to compare the presence of residual melanoma in the surgical excision specimen and survival between patients with negative, microscopically positive, and macroscopically positive biopsy margins.

Methods: Patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical excision over a 13-year period were included. Biopsy characteristics, residual disease in the surgical specimen, and overall and recurrence-free survival were compared between patients with negative, microscopically positive (only scar visible), and macroscopically positive (visible remaining melanoma) biopsy margins.

Results: Of 901 patients, 42.4%, 33.3%, and 24.3% had negative, microscopically positive, and macroscopically positive margins, respectively. The incidence of residual invasive melanoma in the surgical specimen varied (P < 0.001), occurring in 5.5%, 17.0%, and 74.9% of patients, respectively. Both microscopically and macroscopically positive margins were associated with residual disease (P < 0.001) but only the latter predicted worse overall (P = 0.013) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.009). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was comparable between those with negative and microscopically positive margins, but overall (P = 0.006) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.004) were significantly worse in the macroscopically positive margin group. These patients had worse prognosis melanoma, with 33.8% being stage III disease, and 23.2% having positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Conclusions: Patients and physicians may be reassured in the presence of microscopically positive biopsy margins which are not associated with worse survival, However, patients with macroscopically positive margins have poorer prognosis and should be treated within an acceptable time frame.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑色素瘤活检边缘阳性是否重要?微观与宏观边缘状态及其对残留病灶和存活率影响的队列研究。
背景:黑色素瘤活检切缘阳性会使患者对从延迟到手术切除的潜在疾病进展感到焦虑,但其对预后的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在比较手术切除标本中是否存在残留黑色素瘤,以及活检切缘阴性、显微镜下阳性和大体阳性患者的生存率:方法:纳入13年间接受手术切除的皮肤黑色素瘤患者。比较了活检切缘阴性、显微镜下阳性(仅可见疤痕)和宏观上阳性(可见残留黑色素瘤)患者的活检特征、手术标本中的残留疾病以及总生存率和无复发生存率:在901名患者中,阴性、显微镜下阳性和大体阳性切缘的患者分别占42.4%、33.3%和24.3%。手术标本中残留浸润性黑色素瘤的发生率各不相同(P 结论:手术标本中残留浸润性黑色素瘤的发生率各不相同:显微镜下活检切缘阳性与生存率降低无关,患者和医生可以放心;但切缘大体阳性的患者预后较差,应在可接受的时间范围内进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
Significance of Residual Nodal Disease in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. A Novel Liver Metastasis Score for Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional Study. Histopathological Prognostic Factors of Surgically Treated HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks. ASO Author Reflections: Enhancing Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy in Gastric Cancer-The Role of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1