Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to never treatment during mass drug administration among mobile and migrant populations in Mali: a qualitative exploratory study.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015671
Moussa Sangare, Abdoul Fatao Diabate, Yaya Ibrahim Coulibaly, Diadje Tanapo, Sekou Oumarou Thera, Housseini Dolo, Ilo Dicko, Oumar Coulibaly, Binta Sall, Fatoumata Traore, Seydou Doumbia, Manisha A Kulkarni, Thomas B Nutman, Alison Krentel
{"title":"Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to never treatment during mass drug administration among mobile and migrant populations in Mali: a qualitative exploratory study.","authors":"Moussa Sangare, Abdoul Fatao Diabate, Yaya Ibrahim Coulibaly, Diadje Tanapo, Sekou Oumarou Thera, Housseini Dolo, Ilo Dicko, Oumar Coulibaly, Binta Sall, Fatoumata Traore, Seydou Doumbia, Manisha A Kulkarni, Thomas B Nutman, Alison Krentel","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Five of the neglected tropical diseases use a strategy of preventative chemotherapy distributed via mass drug administration (MDA) for all eligible people living in endemic areas. To be successful, high coverage must be sustained over multiple rounds. Therefore, it will be difficult to reach elimination as a public health problem using MDA if there remain clusters of people who have never been treated. The study aims to explore the reasons why people with high mobility report being never treated during MDA and to provide evidence to support the development of standardised questions for data collection using qualitative research tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory study using qualitative methods among displaced people, nomads/transhumants and economic migrants who self-reported that they had never been treated during MDA in the health districts of Tominian and Kalabancoro in Mali. Data were collected through in-depth individual interviews and focus group discussions. Nvivo V.14 software was used for data management and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main reasons reported for never treatment included: geographical mobility, lack of awareness/information, negative rumours, fear of side effects, conflict and insecurity and logistical difficulties faced in reaching these populations. Proposed solutions included involving communities in the MDA, increasing awareness and information campaigns, effectively managing side effects, and designing and implementing flexible and effective interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights that there are people with high mobility who may never have been treated during any round of MDA. The reasons for never treatment highlight the challenges faced when reaching particular groups during MDA activities/interventions. Suggested remedies will require programmes to implement more flexible and tailored interventions. Customised approaches based on the context are essential to guarantee fair access to preventive chemotherapy. Effective interventions must consider the supply and demand side in crafting interventions. This research adds to the evidence base to understand never treatment, particularly among highly mobile population groups and in schistosomiasis elimination programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Five of the neglected tropical diseases use a strategy of preventative chemotherapy distributed via mass drug administration (MDA) for all eligible people living in endemic areas. To be successful, high coverage must be sustained over multiple rounds. Therefore, it will be difficult to reach elimination as a public health problem using MDA if there remain clusters of people who have never been treated. The study aims to explore the reasons why people with high mobility report being never treated during MDA and to provide evidence to support the development of standardised questions for data collection using qualitative research tools.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory study using qualitative methods among displaced people, nomads/transhumants and economic migrants who self-reported that they had never been treated during MDA in the health districts of Tominian and Kalabancoro in Mali. Data were collected through in-depth individual interviews and focus group discussions. Nvivo V.14 software was used for data management and analysis.

Results: The main reasons reported for never treatment included: geographical mobility, lack of awareness/information, negative rumours, fear of side effects, conflict and insecurity and logistical difficulties faced in reaching these populations. Proposed solutions included involving communities in the MDA, increasing awareness and information campaigns, effectively managing side effects, and designing and implementing flexible and effective interventions.

Conclusion: This study highlights that there are people with high mobility who may never have been treated during any round of MDA. The reasons for never treatment highlight the challenges faced when reaching particular groups during MDA activities/interventions. Suggested remedies will require programmes to implement more flexible and tailored interventions. Customised approaches based on the context are essential to guarantee fair access to preventive chemotherapy. Effective interventions must consider the supply and demand side in crafting interventions. This research adds to the evidence base to understand never treatment, particularly among highly mobile population groups and in schistosomiasis elimination programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解马里流动人口和移民在大规模用药期间从未接受治疗的障碍和促进因素:一项定性探索性研究。
导言:有五种被忽视的热带疾病采用预防性化疗策略,通过大规模药物管理(MDA)向流行地区所有符合条件的人分发药物。要取得成功,必须在多轮治疗中保持高覆盖率。因此,如果仍有一些人从未接受过治疗,那么就很难通过大规模给药来消除这一公共卫生问题。本研究旨在探讨流动性大的人群在 MDA 期间报告从未接受治疗的原因,并为使用定性研究工具开发标准化数据收集问题提供证据支持:我们采用定性方法对马里托米尼安和卡拉班科罗卫生区的流离失所者、游牧民/流动人口和经济移民进行了一项探索性研究,他们自称从未在军事医学援助期间接受过治疗。数据是通过深入的个人访谈和焦点小组讨论收集的。数据管理和分析使用了 Nvivo V.14 软件:据报告,从未接受治疗的主要原因包括:地域流动性、缺乏认识/信息、负面传言、担心副作用、冲突和不安全以及在接触这些人群时面临的后勤困难。建议的解决方案包括让社区参与到 MDA 中,加强宣传和信息活动,有效控制副作用,以及设计和实施灵活有效的干预措施:本研究强调,有些行动不便的人可能从未在任何一轮 MDA 中接受过治疗。从未接受治疗的原因凸显了在开展 MDA 活动/干预时,在接触特定群体时所面临的挑战。建议的补救措施将要求计划实施更加灵活和量身定制的干预措施。根据具体情况量身定制的方法对于保证公平获得预防性化疗至关重要。有效的干预措施在制定时必须考虑到供需双方。这项研究为了解从未接受过治疗的情况提供了更多证据,尤其是在高流动性人群和消除血吸虫病计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Caught between violence: Mpox virus and the perils of neglect in Africa. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination using potential next-generation influenza vaccines in Thailand: a modelling study. Probing the past: historical case study analysis to inform more just and sustainable global health partnerships in education. Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research. Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1