Yu Ma , Yanxi Han , Zhenli Diao , Yuqing Chen , Tao Huang , Lei Feng , Jian Jiang , Yuanfeng Zhang , Jinming Li , Rui Zhang
{"title":"New practice of BCR::ABL1 standardization system based on p210 and p190 BCR::ABL1 reference materials","authors":"Yu Ma , Yanxi Han , Zhenli Diao , Yuqing Chen , Tao Huang , Lei Feng , Jian Jiang , Yuanfeng Zhang , Jinming Li , Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2024.119991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantification of <em>BCR::ABL1</em> monitors minimal residual disease, thus critical for patient stratification. While significant progress has been made in enhancing the accuracy of <em>p210 BCR::ABL1</em> quantification, no equivalent standardization has been conducted for <em>p190 BCR::ABL1</em>. Therefore, we developed <em>p190 BCR::ABL1</em> reference materials to calibrate the quantitative process through an innovative plasmid-based calibration strategy. Then, we further explored the use of <em>p190</em> and <em>p210</em> reference materials to standardize tests in 159 laboratories across China and assessed their detection capability utilizing quality assessment samples. Results suggested that after calibration, the coefficient of variation of detection results decreased from 50.8 %–57.4 % to 24.9 %–36.4 % for <em>p190</em>, and from 37.6 %–49.0 % to 19.1 %–28.5 % for <em>p210</em>. The percentage of laboratories within ± 2-fold of the target values increased from 77.1 %, 76.4 %, 73.2 %, and 74.5 % to 94.3 %, 95.5 %, 92.4 %, and 91.1 % for <em>p190</em> samples 2023S21–2023S24, and from 72.3 %, 86.2 %, 79.2 %, and 81.1 % to 98.1 %, 99.4 %, 98.1 %, and 96.2 % for <em>p210</em> samples 2023S11–2023S14. Overall, our study successfully developed and employed <em>p190</em> and <em>p210</em> reference materials to promote accuracy and comparability of <em>BCR::ABL1</em> quantification among laboratories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"565 ","pages":"Article 119991"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898124022447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantification of BCR::ABL1 monitors minimal residual disease, thus critical for patient stratification. While significant progress has been made in enhancing the accuracy of p210 BCR::ABL1 quantification, no equivalent standardization has been conducted for p190 BCR::ABL1. Therefore, we developed p190 BCR::ABL1 reference materials to calibrate the quantitative process through an innovative plasmid-based calibration strategy. Then, we further explored the use of p190 and p210 reference materials to standardize tests in 159 laboratories across China and assessed their detection capability utilizing quality assessment samples. Results suggested that after calibration, the coefficient of variation of detection results decreased from 50.8 %–57.4 % to 24.9 %–36.4 % for p190, and from 37.6 %–49.0 % to 19.1 %–28.5 % for p210. The percentage of laboratories within ± 2-fold of the target values increased from 77.1 %, 76.4 %, 73.2 %, and 74.5 % to 94.3 %, 95.5 %, 92.4 %, and 91.1 % for p190 samples 2023S21–2023S24, and from 72.3 %, 86.2 %, 79.2 %, and 81.1 % to 98.1 %, 99.4 %, 98.1 %, and 96.2 % for p210 samples 2023S11–2023S14. Overall, our study successfully developed and employed p190 and p210 reference materials to promote accuracy and comparability of BCR::ABL1 quantification among laboratories.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC)
Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells.
The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.