Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan for duodenal ulcers in Chinese patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2414090
Ye Zong, Cheng Lan, Xing Li, Weixing Chen, Honghui Chen, Aijun Liao, Side Liu, Chanyan Hu, Yongdong Wu, Shutian Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan for duodenal ulcers in Chinese patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study.","authors":"Ye Zong, Cheng Lan, Xing Li, Weixing Chen, Honghui Chen, Aijun Liao, Side Liu, Chanyan Hu, Yongdong Wu, Shutian Zhang","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2414090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tegoprazan represents a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker utilized for the treatment of acid-related disorders. The present study aimed to explore the therapeutic effectiveness of tegoprazan in Chinese individuals with duodenal ulcers (DU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, individuals with DU underwent randomization 1:1 to be administered tegoprazan 50 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week endoscopic ulcer healing rate and relief of DU-related gastrointestinal symptoms at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Safety analysis encompassed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rates were 96.9% (188/194) and 99.0% (189/191) in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, indicating a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.9 to 0.8) in the full analysis set (FAS). The corresponding healing rates were 98.4% (185/188) and 99.5% (183/184) in the per-protocol set, respectively, indicating a difference of -1.1% (95% CI = -3.1 to 1.0). The 4-week healing rates in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups were 89.2% (173/194) and 88.5% (169/191) in the FAS, respectively, with a difference of 0.7% (95% CI = -5.6 to 7.0). Treatment-related AEs, all mild-to-moderate, were reported in 38.2% (78/204) and 48.2% (94/195) of participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tegoprazan 50 mg once daily is effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in Chinese patients with DU, showing a promising safety and tolerability profile.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: </strong>NCT05010954.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1855-1862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2414090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Tegoprazan represents a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker utilized for the treatment of acid-related disorders. The present study aimed to explore the therapeutic effectiveness of tegoprazan in Chinese individuals with duodenal ulcers (DU).

Methods: In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, individuals with DU underwent randomization 1:1 to be administered tegoprazan 50 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week endoscopic ulcer healing rate and relief of DU-related gastrointestinal symptoms at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Safety analysis encompassed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory indexes.

Results: The 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rates were 96.9% (188/194) and 99.0% (189/191) in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, indicating a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.9 to 0.8) in the full analysis set (FAS). The corresponding healing rates were 98.4% (185/188) and 99.5% (183/184) in the per-protocol set, respectively, indicating a difference of -1.1% (95% CI = -3.1 to 1.0). The 4-week healing rates in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups were 89.2% (173/194) and 88.5% (169/191) in the FAS, respectively, with a difference of 0.7% (95% CI = -5.6 to 7.0). Treatment-related AEs, all mild-to-moderate, were reported in 38.2% (78/204) and 48.2% (94/195) of participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Tegoprazan 50 mg once daily is effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in Chinese patients with DU, showing a promising safety and tolerability profile.

Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05010954.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特戈普拉赞治疗中国十二指肠溃疡的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性 III 期研究。
目的:替戈普拉赞是一种新开发的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,用于治疗酸相关疾病。本研究旨在探讨替戈普拉赞对中国十二指肠溃疡(DU)患者的治疗效果:在本项多中心、随机、双盲、双假、平行组、非劣效性、III期临床试验中,十二指肠溃疡患者按1:1的比例随机接受替戈普拉赞50毫克或兰索拉唑30毫克的治疗,每天一次。主要疗效终点是 6 周累计内镜下溃疡愈合率。次要终点包括第 2、4 和 6 周的 4 周内镜溃疡愈合率和 DU 相关胃肠道症状缓解率。安全性分析包括不良事件(AE)和实验室指标:特戈普拉赞组和兰索拉唑组的6周累积内镜溃疡愈合率分别为96.9%(188/194)和99.0%(189/191),表明在完整分析集(FAS)中两者的差异为-2.0%(95%置信区间(CI),-4.9至0.8)。在按协议组中,相应的愈合率分别为98.4%(185/188)和99.5%(183/184),差异为-1.1%(95% CI -3.1至1.0)。在FAS中,替戈普拉赞组和兰索拉唑组的4周痊愈率分别为89.2%(173/194)和88.5%(169/191),差异为0.7%(95% CI -5.6至7.0)。特戈普拉赞组和兰索拉唑组分别有38.2%(78/204)和48.2%(94/195)的参与者出现与治疗相关的AE,均为轻度至中度:特戈普拉赞50毫克,每日一次,对中国DU患者有效,且疗效不劣于兰索拉唑30毫克,安全性和耐受性良好:NCT05010954。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
A review of clinical applications of pharmacokinetic simulations for a 2-month long-acting injectable formulation of aripiprazole. Perioperative and periprocedural management of GLP-1 receptor-based agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors: narrative review and the STOP-GAP and STOP DKA-2 algorithms. Communicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study. The response to pericapsular soft tissue and pelvic realignment therapy may be partially predicted by the relevant factors influencing the program's response of the candidates with hip osteoarthritis for joint replacement. Assessment of clinical characteristics and mortality in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 from January 2022 to November 2022, when Omicron variants were predominant in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1