The impact of oral anticoagulants on mortality from pneumonia: a propensity score matching analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2471498
Martin J Ryll, Isabell Aster, Aurelia Zodl, Sarah Thaler, Clemens Rieder, Roland Tomasi, Philipp Groene
{"title":"The impact of oral anticoagulants on mortality from pneumonia: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Martin J Ryll, Isabell Aster, Aurelia Zodl, Sarah Thaler, Clemens Rieder, Roland Tomasi, Philipp Groene","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2471498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pneumonia continues to be one of the leading causes of death. During the COVID pandemic, pre-existing anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appeared to be beneficial. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-existing DOAC therapy on mortality from community-acquired, non-COVID pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized data from the eICU Collaborative Research Database, a comprehensive, multi-institutional critical care database. We included all adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia, selecting for patients with a primary admission diagnosis of pneumonia or pulmonary sepsis who were admitted to the ICU <24 h after admission to the hospital. To adjust for confounders, we performed propensity score matching, matching patients receiving DOACs to an equivalent cohort of patients not receiving DOAC therapy. Our primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, all-cause in-ICU mortality, intubation within 24 h following ICU admission, incidence of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy, vasopressor administration, and mechanical ventilation days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our final matched cohort included 198 DOAC patients matched to 594 patients without DOAC therapy. Survival was significantly higher in DOAC patients with a hazard ratio of 0.56 [95% CI = 0.36-088]. Both all-cause in-unit mortality (6.1% [95% CI = 2.7-9.4%] vs. 13.3% [95% CI = 10.6-16.0%], <i>p</i> = 0.008) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (11.6% [95% CI = 7.2-16.1%] vs. 19.7% [95% CI = 16.5-22.9%], <i>p</i> = 0.013) were significantly lower in patients receiving DOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a positive association between the pre-existing intake of direct oral anticoagulants and the survival of community acquired pneumonia. Future prospective studies should evaluate supportive therapy with DOACs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2471498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pneumonia continues to be one of the leading causes of death. During the COVID pandemic, pre-existing anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appeared to be beneficial. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-existing DOAC therapy on mortality from community-acquired, non-COVID pneumonia.

Methods: The study utilized data from the eICU Collaborative Research Database, a comprehensive, multi-institutional critical care database. We included all adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia, selecting for patients with a primary admission diagnosis of pneumonia or pulmonary sepsis who were admitted to the ICU <24 h after admission to the hospital. To adjust for confounders, we performed propensity score matching, matching patients receiving DOACs to an equivalent cohort of patients not receiving DOAC therapy. Our primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, all-cause in-ICU mortality, intubation within 24 h following ICU admission, incidence of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy, vasopressor administration, and mechanical ventilation days.

Results: Our final matched cohort included 198 DOAC patients matched to 594 patients without DOAC therapy. Survival was significantly higher in DOAC patients with a hazard ratio of 0.56 [95% CI = 0.36-088]. Both all-cause in-unit mortality (6.1% [95% CI = 2.7-9.4%] vs. 13.3% [95% CI = 10.6-16.0%], p = 0.008) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (11.6% [95% CI = 7.2-16.1%] vs. 19.7% [95% CI = 16.5-22.9%], p = 0.013) were significantly lower in patients receiving DOACs.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a positive association between the pre-existing intake of direct oral anticoagulants and the survival of community acquired pneumonia. Future prospective studies should evaluate supportive therapy with DOACs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:肺炎仍然是导致死亡的主要原因之一。在Covid大流行期间,使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)进行前期抗凝治疗似乎是有益的。本研究旨在调查已有的 DOAC 治疗对社区获得性非禽流感肺炎死亡率的影响:本研究利用的数据来自 eICU 合作研究数据库,这是一个综合性的多机构重症监护数据库。我们纳入了所有患社区获得性肺炎的成年患者,并选择了主要入院诊断为肺炎或肺败血症且入住重症监护室的患者:我们的最终匹配队列包括 198 名 DOAC 患者和 594 名未接受 DOAC 治疗的患者。DOAC 患者的生存率明显更高,危险比为 0.56 [95% CI:0.36-088]。接受 DOACs 治疗的患者全因住院死亡率(6.1% [95%CI: 2.7%-9.4%] vs. 13.3% [95%CI: 10.6%-16.0%], P = 0.008)和全因院内死亡率(11.6% [95%CI: 7.2%-16.1%] vs. 19.7% [95%CI: 16.5%-22.9%], P = 0.013)均明显降低:本研究表明,预先服用直接口服抗凝药与社区获得性肺炎的存活率之间存在正相关。未来的前瞻性研究应评估使用 DOACs 的支持疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
Web references are not eternal: time-trend and qualitative impact of the loss of access to online resources cited in peer-reviewed medical journals. Fezolinetant effect on vasomotor symptoms due to menopause in women unsuitable for hormone therapy. Methodological challenges and clinical perspectives in evaluating new treatments for ultra rare cancers. The impact of oral anticoagulants on mortality from pneumonia: a propensity score matching analysis. Tele-patient-reported outcome measures (telePROM) in follow-up of endometriosis: a validity and test-retest reliability study of an endometriosis-specific questionnaire (EQ).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1