Together, alone: Personal experiences of virtual funeral attendance during the COVID-19 global pandemic.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2024.2400368
Lochlan Wilson, Gagan Gill, Salina Pirzada, Kelsey Papineau, Pankratz Lily, Kristin Reynolds, Maia S Kredentser, Renée El-Gabalawy, Tim Hiebert, Kendiss Olafson, Christian La Rivière, James M Bolton, Jennifer Hensel, Harvey Max Chochinov
{"title":"Together, alone: Personal experiences of virtual funeral attendance during the COVID-19 global pandemic.","authors":"Lochlan Wilson, Gagan Gill, Salina Pirzada, Kelsey Papineau, Pankratz Lily, Kristin Reynolds, Maia S Kredentser, Renée El-Gabalawy, Tim Hiebert, Kendiss Olafson, Christian La Rivière, James M Bolton, Jennifer Hensel, Harvey Max Chochinov","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2024.2400368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused profound distortions in how deaths were marked by those left to mourn their passing. Public health restrictions prohibited gatherings of friends and families for traditional funerals, causing an upsurge in reliance on virtual alternatives. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of individuals attending virtual funerals following a death of any cause, including reasons for choosing virtual attendance, perceived differences relative to in person attendance, and the extent to which mourning practices were accommodated. Between May 2021 and June 2022, we identified 57 participants with virtual funeral attendance experience. They identified many shortcomings of virtual funerals, captured under themes including, <i>socialization</i>, <i>community support</i>, <i>sharing food</i>, <i>physical contact</i>, <i>consoling the bereaved</i>, <i>sharing memories</i>, and <i>connection</i>. There were features of virtual funerals that participants appreciated, summarized by themes including, <i>accessibility</i>, <i>taking part or marking the event</i>, <i>closure</i>, <i>technological advantages and privacy.</i> Despite a sense that virtual funerals provided an opportunity to grieve \"together, alone,\" most conceded it was better than not being able to take part at all. This study provides detailed information about participating in virtual funerals, identifying features of this experience that should be examined to determine how those may influence grieving processes and bereavement outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2400368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused profound distortions in how deaths were marked by those left to mourn their passing. Public health restrictions prohibited gatherings of friends and families for traditional funerals, causing an upsurge in reliance on virtual alternatives. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of individuals attending virtual funerals following a death of any cause, including reasons for choosing virtual attendance, perceived differences relative to in person attendance, and the extent to which mourning practices were accommodated. Between May 2021 and June 2022, we identified 57 participants with virtual funeral attendance experience. They identified many shortcomings of virtual funerals, captured under themes including, socialization, community support, sharing food, physical contact, consoling the bereaved, sharing memories, and connection. There were features of virtual funerals that participants appreciated, summarized by themes including, accessibility, taking part or marking the event, closure, technological advantages and privacy. Despite a sense that virtual funerals provided an opportunity to grieve "together, alone," most conceded it was better than not being able to take part at all. This study provides detailed information about participating in virtual funerals, identifying features of this experience that should be examined to determine how those may influence grieving processes and bereavement outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相聚,孤独:在 COVID-19 全球大流行期间参加虚拟葬礼的个人经历。
COVID-19 大流行对逝者的悼念方式造成了深刻的扭曲。公共卫生限制禁止亲朋好友聚集在一起举行传统葬礼,导致对虚拟葬礼的依赖激增。本研究的目的是探讨因任何原因死亡后参加虚拟葬礼的个人的经历,包括选择虚拟葬礼的原因、与亲自参加葬礼相比所感受到的差异,以及悼念方式的适应程度。在 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,我们确定了 57 位有虚拟葬礼参加经验的参与者。他们指出了虚拟葬礼的许多缺点,主题包括社交、社区支持、分享食物、身体接触、安慰丧亲者、分享回忆和联系。虚拟葬礼也有一些令参与者赞赏的特点,归纳起来有以下主题:无障碍、参与或纪念活动、结束、技术优势和隐私。尽管大多数人认为虚拟葬礼提供了一个 "一起独自 "哀悼的机会,但他们也承认这比完全不能参加葬礼要好。本研究提供了有关参加虚拟葬礼的详细信息,确定了这种经历的特点,应对此进行研究,以确定这些特点如何影响哀悼过程和丧亲结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Rational suicide? Interviews with Swedish psychiatrists. Together, alone: Personal experiences of virtual funeral attendance during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Correction. Complication of Grief and PTSD among bereaved siblings in Israel. Is COVID-19 loss more associated with prolonged grief disorder than other losses?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1