Cross-sectional study of the optimal types of physical exercise for cognitive function in older Japanese adults

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics & Gerontology International Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/ggi.14991
Koki Nagata, Kyohei Shibuya, Yuya Fujii, Jaehoon Seol, Takashi Jindo, Tomohiro Okura
{"title":"Cross-sectional study of the optimal types of physical exercise for cognitive function in older Japanese adults","authors":"Koki Nagata,&nbsp;Kyohei Shibuya,&nbsp;Yuya Fujii,&nbsp;Jaehoon Seol,&nbsp;Takashi Jindo,&nbsp;Tomohiro Okura","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine whether practicing coordination exercises, compared with other physical exercise types, is associated with better cognitive function in older Japanese adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study used data from a health checkup project carried out from 2015 to 2019 among older adults living in Kasama City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from 569 participants (mean age 74.0 ± 5.4 years, 53.8% women) were analyzed. The types of physical exercise practiced within the seven preceding days were identified. The Five-Cog test and Trail Making Test were used to evaluate general cognitive function and executive function, respectively. The cognitive functions of practitioners and non-practitioners of each type of physical exercise – coordination, endurance, resistance, and stretching – were examined using an analysis of covariance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although practitioners of any physical exercise did not have significantly better cognitive function than non-practitioners, in an analysis stratified by exercise amount, those who practiced more coordination exercise had better general cognitive function than non-practitioners (<i>P</i> = 0.046), in a fully adjusted model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Those who practiced more coordination exercises had better general cognitive function. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1173–1180</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to determine whether practicing coordination exercises, compared with other physical exercise types, is associated with better cognitive function in older Japanese adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from a health checkup project carried out from 2015 to 2019 among older adults living in Kasama City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from 569 participants (mean age 74.0 ± 5.4 years, 53.8% women) were analyzed. The types of physical exercise practiced within the seven preceding days were identified. The Five-Cog test and Trail Making Test were used to evaluate general cognitive function and executive function, respectively. The cognitive functions of practitioners and non-practitioners of each type of physical exercise – coordination, endurance, resistance, and stretching – were examined using an analysis of covariance.

Results

Although practitioners of any physical exercise did not have significantly better cognitive function than non-practitioners, in an analysis stratified by exercise amount, those who practiced more coordination exercise had better general cognitive function than non-practitioners (P = 0.046), in a fully adjusted model.

Conclusion

Those who practiced more coordination exercises had better general cognitive function. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1173–1180.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本老年人认知功能最佳体育锻炼类型的横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定与其他类型的体育锻炼相比,练习协调运动是否与日本老年人认知功能的改善有关:这项横断面研究使用了2015年至2019年在日本茨城县笠间市老年人中开展的健康检查项目的数据。研究分析了 569 名参与者(平均年龄为 74.0 ± 5.4 岁,53.8% 为女性)的数据。研究人员确定了前七天内进行的体育锻炼类型。五格测试和追踪测试分别用于评估一般认知功能和执行功能。采用协方差分析法研究了协调、耐力、阻力和伸展等各类体育锻炼练习者和非练习者的认知功能:结果:虽然任何体育锻炼的练习者的认知功能都没有明显优于非练习者,但在按运动量分层的分析中,在完全调整模型中,那些进行更多协调性锻炼的人的一般认知功能优于非练习者(P = 0.046):结论:进行更多协调运动的人具有更好的一般认知功能。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; --:-----.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy analysis of SARC-F, its modified versions and the Quality of Life in Sarcopenia questionnaire in screening for sarcopenia in nursing home residents. The association between employment and cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review. Association between cardiovascular disease risk and sarcopenia in community-dwelling Japanese older adults. Aphasia in Alzheimer's disease: Frequency and characteristics. Regional disparities in home health care utilization for older adults and their associated factors at the secondary medical area level: A Nationwide study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1