Ratio of emergency department visits to deaths for opioid overdose.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1136/ip-2023-045116
Himani Byregowda, Ryoko Susukida, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Monique Wilson, Marie Stratton, Renee M Johnson
{"title":"Ratio of emergency department visits to deaths for opioid overdose.","authors":"Himani Byregowda, Ryoko Susukida, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Monique Wilson, Marie Stratton, Renee M Johnson","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on fatal and non-fatal overdose provide important information about the magnitude of the overdose crisis. We consider these metrics in tandem and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits to opioid overdose deaths. A lower ratio could indicate more fatal overdoses, fewer overdose reversals with naloxone or a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Maryland Vital Statistics Administration (opioid overdose deaths), the Health Services Cost Review Commission (non-fatal ED visits for opioid overdose). We generated 2020 annual rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose deaths for the state of Maryland and its 24 jurisdictions and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related ED visits to deaths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2020 visit-to-death ratio for Maryland was 1.7, and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 across jurisdictions. We identified five counties that had above-median rates of opioid overdose-related ED visits and deaths, and low visit-to-death ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that there were nearly two ED visits for each opioid overdose death in Maryland, and there was substantial variation across counties. The visit-to-death ratio enables a better understanding of the relationship between fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose and is essential to averting deaths and evaluating overdose prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data on fatal and non-fatal overdose provide important information about the magnitude of the overdose crisis. We consider these metrics in tandem and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits to opioid overdose deaths. A lower ratio could indicate more fatal overdoses, fewer overdose reversals with naloxone or a combination of both.

Methods: Data are from the Maryland Vital Statistics Administration (opioid overdose deaths), the Health Services Cost Review Commission (non-fatal ED visits for opioid overdose). We generated 2020 annual rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose deaths for the state of Maryland and its 24 jurisdictions and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related ED visits to deaths.

Results: The 2020 visit-to-death ratio for Maryland was 1.7, and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 across jurisdictions. We identified five counties that had above-median rates of opioid overdose-related ED visits and deaths, and low visit-to-death ratios.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that there were nearly two ED visits for each opioid overdose death in Maryland, and there was substantial variation across counties. The visit-to-death ratio enables a better understanding of the relationship between fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose and is essential to averting deaths and evaluating overdose prevention efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物过量导致的急诊就诊人数与死亡人数之比。
背景:有关致命和非致命用药过量的数据提供了有关用药过量危机严重程度的重要信息。我们同时考虑了这些指标,并估算了与阿片类药物过量相关的急诊科(ED)就诊人数与阿片类药物过量死亡人数之比。比率越低,表明致命的过量用药人数越多,使用纳洛酮逆转过量用药的人数越少,或者两者兼而有之:数据来自马里兰州生命统计管理局(阿片类药物过量死亡)和健康服务成本审查委员会(阿片类药物过量非致命性急诊就诊)。我们为马里兰州及其 24 个辖区生成了 2020 年阿片类药物过量致死和非致死的年死亡率,并估算了阿片类药物过量相关急诊室就诊与死亡的比率:马里兰州 2020 年的就诊与死亡比率为 1.7,各辖区的比率从 0.9 到 3.8 不等。我们发现有五个县的阿片类药物过量相关急诊室就诊率和死亡率高于中位数,但就诊与死亡比率较低:我们的研究结果表明,在马里兰州,每发生一起阿片类药物过量死亡事件,就会有近两例急诊室就诊,而且各县之间的差异很大。就诊与死亡比率有助于更好地了解致命和非致命阿片类药物过量之间的关系,对于避免死亡和评估药物过量预防工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
期刊最新文献
Social determinants of health, driving time to trauma hospitals, racial composition, and firearm violence in South Carolina. Socioeconomic, demographic and environmental factors of child drownings in Northern Bangladesh. Characteristics of injury deaths among homeless and non-homeless US veterans (2017-2021). Did 'long COVID' increase road deaths in the USA? Financial barriers and facilitators to secure firearm and medication storage among veterans with elevated suicide risk: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1