首页 > 最新文献

Injury Prevention最新文献

英文 中文
Predictors of ATF inspections of FFLs and subsequent violations. 烟酒枪支弹药管理局(ATF)对联邦枪支弹药管理局(FFL)的检查及其后违规行为的预测因素。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2024-045360
Paul Reeping, Grace Killian, Ariana N Gobaud, Christina Mehranbod, Sonali Rajan

Background: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) conducts inspections of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to ensure compliance with federal laws in an effort to keep the public safe from firearm violence. However, the criteria for which FFLs are inspected lacks transparency, potentially signalling inefficiencies or biases.

Methods: We extracted data on FFL inspections and violations (2016-2017) requiring remedial action from the Gun Store Transparency Project database and the ATF's FFLs listings. Using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effect for states and robust SE, we estimated the census tract and state level predictors of 1) the likelihood of the ATF inspecting an FFL and 2) among those inspected, the likelihood of a violation.

Results: Of the 93,420 FFLs, 22 921 were inspected and 2392 had violations requiring remedial action. Increased likelihood of inspection was statistically significantly associated with higher levels of poverty, lower median income, greater non-White population percentages, and older census tract median ages. The sole predictor of an FFL receiving a violation requiring remedial action was the state's firearm law permissiveness.

Discussion: ATF inspections disproportionately targeted communities with higher poverty, lower median income, larger non-White populations, and older demographics. This indicates potential racial and socioeconomic biases, diverting attention from jurisdictions with more lenient firearm laws where violations were more likely to occur.

Conclusion: The ATF needs to reassess the influence of potential biases on its strategies for selecting FFLs for inspections and instead focus on risk-based assessments in order to promote public safety.

背景:烟酒枪支爆炸物管理局(ATF)对联邦枪支许可证持有者(ffl)进行检查,以确保遵守联邦法律,努力保护公众安全,免受枪支暴力。然而,检查ffl的标准缺乏透明度,可能表明效率低下或存在偏见。方法:我们从枪支商店透明度项目数据库和ATF的FFL清单中提取了2016-2017年需要采取补救措施的FFL检查和违规数据。使用具有各州随机效应和稳健SE的广义线性混合模型,我们估计了人口普查区和州一级的预测因子:1)ATF检查FFL的可能性;2)在被检查的人群中,违规的可能性。结果:在93420个ffl中,检查了22921个,有2392个违规需要纠正。增加的检查可能性在统计上与较高的贫困水平、较低的收入中位数、较高的非白人人口百分比和较大的人口普查区中位数年龄显著相关。唯一能预测FFL是否违反规定需要采取补救措施的因素是该州的枪支法许可。讨论:ATF检查不成比例地针对贫困程度较高、收入中位数较低、非白人人口较多和年龄较大的社区。这表明了潜在的种族和社会经济偏见,将人们的注意力从枪支法律更宽松的司法管辖区转移到更容易发生违法行为的地方。结论:ATF需要重新评估潜在偏见对其选择ffl检查策略的影响,并将重点放在基于风险的评估上,以促进公共安全。
{"title":"Predictors of ATF inspections of FFLs and subsequent violations.","authors":"Paul Reeping, Grace Killian, Ariana N Gobaud, Christina Mehranbod, Sonali Rajan","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045360","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2024-045360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) conducts inspections of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to ensure compliance with federal laws in an effort to keep the public safe from firearm violence. However, the criteria for which FFLs are inspected lacks transparency, potentially signalling inefficiencies or biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data on FFL inspections and violations (2016-2017) requiring remedial action from the <i>Gun Store Transparency Project</i> database and the ATF's FFLs listings. Using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effect for states and robust SE, we estimated the census tract and state level predictors of 1) the likelihood of the ATF inspecting an FFL and 2) among those inspected, the likelihood of a violation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 93,420 FFLs, 22 921 were inspected and 2392 had violations requiring remedial action. Increased likelihood of inspection was statistically significantly associated with higher levels of poverty, lower median income, greater non-White population percentages, and older census tract median ages. The sole predictor of an FFL receiving a violation requiring remedial action was the state's firearm law permissiveness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ATF inspections disproportionately targeted communities with higher poverty, lower median income, larger non-White populations, and older demographics. This indicates potential racial and socioeconomic biases, diverting attention from jurisdictions with more lenient firearm laws where violations were more likely to occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ATF needs to reassess the influence of potential biases on its strategies for selecting FFLs for inspections and instead focus on risk-based assessments in order to promote public safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"147-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of veteran suicide risk with state-level firearm ownership rates and firearm laws in the USA. 退伍军人自杀风险与美国各州枪支拥有率和枪支法律的关系。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045211
Andrew R Morral, Terry L Schell, Adam Scherling

Background: Veterans have higher suicide rates than matched non-veterans, with firearm suicides being especially prevalent among veterans. We examined whether state firearm laws and state firearm ownership rates are important risk factors for suicide among veterans.

Methods: US veteran's and demographically matched non-veteran's suicide rates, 2002-2019, are modelled at the state level as a function of veteran status, lethal means, state firearm law restrictiveness, household firearm ownership rates and other covariates.

Results: Marginal effects on expected suicide rates per 100 000 population were contrasted by setting household firearm ownership to its 75th versus 25th percentile values of 52.3% and 35.3%. Ownership was positively associated with suicide rates for both veterans (4.35; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.90, 7.14) and matched non-veterans (3.31; 95% CrI: 1.11, 5.77). This association was due to ownership's strong positive association with firearms suicide, despite a weak negative association with non-firearm suicide. An IQR difference in firearm laws corresponding to three additional restrictive laws was negatively associated with suicide rates for both veterans (-2.49; 95% CrI: -4.64 to -0.21) and matched non-veterans (-3.19; 95% CrI: -5.22 to -1.16). Again, these differences were primarily due to associations with firearm suicide rates. Few differences between veterans and matched non-veterans were found in the associations of state firearm characteristics with suicide rates.

Discussion: Veterans' and matched non-veterans' suicide risk, and specifically their firearm suicide risk, was strongly associated with state firearm characteristics.

Conclusions: These results suggest that changes to state firearm policies might be an effective primary prevention strategy for reducing suicide rates among veterans and non-veterans.

背景:退伍军人的自杀率高于同等条件下的非退伍军人,而持枪自杀在退伍军人中尤为普遍。我们研究了州枪支法和州枪支拥有率是否是退伍军人自杀的重要风险因素:将 2002-2019 年美国退伍军人和人口匹配的非退伍军人的自杀率作为退伍军人身份、致命手段、州枪支法限制性、家庭枪支拥有率和其他协变量的函数,在州一级建立模型:通过将家庭枪支拥有率设定为第 75 百分位值 52.3% 和第 25 百分位值 35.3%,对比了对每 10 万人预期自杀率的边际效应。退伍军人(4.35;95% 可信区间 (CrI):1.90, 7.14)和匹配的非退伍军人(3.31;95% 可信区间 (CrI):1.11, 5.77)的枪支拥有率与自杀率呈正相关。这种关联是由于枪支所有权与枪支自杀有很强的正相关性,尽管与非枪支自杀有微弱的负相关。在退伍军人(-2.49;95% CrI:-4.64 至-0.21)和匹配的非退伍军人(-3.19;95% CrI:-5.22 至-1.16)中,枪支法律的 IQR 差异相当于三个额外的限制性法律,与自杀率呈负相关。同样,这些差异主要是由于与枪支自杀率的关联造成的。在州枪支特征与自杀率的关联方面,退伍军人与匹配的非退伍军人之间几乎没有差异:退伍军人和匹配的非退伍军人的自杀风险,特别是持枪自杀风险,与州枪支特征密切相关:这些结果表明,改变州枪支政策可能是降低退伍军人和非退伍军人自杀率的有效初级预防策略。
{"title":"Association of veteran suicide risk with state-level firearm ownership rates and firearm laws in the USA.","authors":"Andrew R Morral, Terry L Schell, Adam Scherling","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045211","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2023-045211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterans have higher suicide rates than matched non-veterans, with firearm suicides being especially prevalent among veterans. We examined whether state firearm laws and state firearm ownership rates are important risk factors for suicide among veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US veteran's and demographically matched non-veteran's suicide rates, 2002-2019, are modelled at the state level as a function of veteran status, lethal means, state firearm law restrictiveness, household firearm ownership rates and other covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marginal effects on expected suicide rates per 100 000 population were contrasted by setting household firearm ownership to its 75th versus 25th percentile values of 52.3% and 35.3%. Ownership was positively associated with suicide rates for both veterans (4.35; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.90, 7.14) and matched non-veterans (3.31; 95% CrI: 1.11, 5.77). This association was due to ownership's strong positive association with firearms suicide, despite a weak negative association with non-firearm suicide. An IQR difference in firearm laws corresponding to three additional restrictive laws was negatively associated with suicide rates for both veterans (-2.49; 95% CrI: -4.64 to -0.21) and matched non-veterans (-3.19; 95% CrI: -5.22 to -1.16). Again, these differences were primarily due to associations with firearm suicide rates. Few differences between veterans and matched non-veterans were found in the associations of state firearm characteristics with suicide rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Veterans' and matched non-veterans' suicide risk, and specifically their firearm suicide risk, was strongly associated with state firearm characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that changes to state firearm policies might be an effective primary prevention strategy for reducing suicide rates among veterans and non-veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Firearm-related threats before migrating to the USA from Latin America and the Caribbean. 从拉丁美洲和加勒比地区移民到美国之前受到的与枪支有关的威胁。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2024-045369
Eugenio Weigend Vargas, Jason Goldstick, Laura Vargas

Background: Every year, thousands of people from Latin America and the Caribbean are migrating to the USA. Policy-makers have argued that US firearms are fuelling violence in these countries and are contributing to migration. The objective of this article is to examine the proportion of immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean arriving at the US border who have previously been threatened with a firearm. This article further explores sociodemographic factors associated with the likelihood of previous firearm-related threats, whether those threats are associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as the reasons behind those threats.

Methods: Data were obtained from a survey of migrants recruited at the southern US border from March 2022 to August 2023. To be selected, respondents had to be 18 years of age or older, had to speak English or Spanish and come from a Latin American or Caribbean country. We used descriptive statistics and a logistic regression.

Results: We analysed 321 cases. Roughly, 48% of respondents reported previous firearm-related threats. Males and respondents coming from Honduras, Venezuela and El Salvador were more likely to report previous firearm-related threats. There was a strong association between previous firearm-related threats and signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Most threats occurred during robberies or extortions, but other threats were perpetrated by authorities, to prevent crime reporting, or by intimate partners.

Conclusion: Understanding the violence, particularly firearm-related violence, experienced by those migrating to the USA from Latin America and the Caribbean could help guide policy discussion and actions.

背景:每年都有成千上万的人从拉丁美洲和加勒比地区移民到美国。政策制定者认为,美国的枪支助长了这些国家的暴力,也是导致移民的原因之一。本文旨在研究抵达美国边境的拉丁美洲和加勒比地区移民中曾受到枪支威胁的比例。本文进一步探讨了与以前受到枪支威胁的可能性有关的社会人口因素、这些威胁是否与创伤后应激障碍有关以及这些威胁背后的原因:数据来自 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月在美国南部边境招募的移民调查。被选中的受访者必须年满 18 周岁,会讲英语或西班牙语,来自拉丁美洲或加勒比海国家。我们使用了描述性统计和逻辑回归:我们分析了 321 个案例。约有 48% 的受访者称曾受到过与枪支有关的威胁。男性和来自洪都拉斯、委内瑞拉和萨尔瓦多的受访者更有可能报告曾受到过枪支威胁。以前受到过与枪支有关的威胁与创伤后应激障碍之间存在密切联系。大多数威胁发生在抢劫或勒索期间,但其他威胁是由当局实施的、为了阻止报案或由亲密伴侣实施的:了解从拉丁美洲和加勒比地区移民到美国的人所经历的暴力,尤其是与枪支有关的暴力,有助于指导政策讨论和行动。
{"title":"Firearm-related threats before migrating to the USA from Latin America and the Caribbean.","authors":"Eugenio Weigend Vargas, Jason Goldstick, Laura Vargas","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045369","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2024-045369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Every year, thousands of people from Latin America and the Caribbean are migrating to the USA. Policy-makers have argued that US firearms are fuelling violence in these countries and are contributing to migration. The objective of this article is to examine the proportion of immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean arriving at the US border who have previously been threatened with a firearm. This article further explores sociodemographic factors associated with the likelihood of previous firearm-related threats, whether those threats are associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as the reasons behind those threats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a survey of migrants recruited at the southern US border from March 2022 to August 2023. To be selected, respondents had to be 18 years of age or older, had to speak English or Spanish and come from a Latin American or Caribbean country. We used descriptive statistics and a logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 321 cases. Roughly, 48% of respondents reported previous firearm-related threats. Males and respondents coming from Honduras, Venezuela and El Salvador were more likely to report previous firearm-related threats. There was a strong association between previous firearm-related threats and signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Most threats occurred during robberies or extortions, but other threats were perpetrated by authorities, to prevent crime reporting, or by intimate partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the violence, particularly firearm-related violence, experienced by those migrating to the USA from Latin America and the Caribbean could help guide policy discussion and actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"155-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142499681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploratory qualitative study of firearm storage practices among surgeons in the USA: contexts and motivations. 美国外科医生枪支储存实践的探索性定性研究:背景与动机。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045205
Shelbie D Waddle, Arielle Thomas, Brendan T Campbell, Marian E Betz, Julie K Johnson, Regina Royan, Alexander Ellyin, Angie Jang, Marie L Crandall, Anne M Stey

Background: A US survey of surgeons found that 32% store firearms unlocked and loaded. This study explored conditions and contexts impacting personal firearm storage methods among surgeons.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with English-speaking fellows of the American College of Surgeons who treated patients injured by firearms and who owned or lived in homes with firearms. Participants were recruited through email and subsequent snowball sampling from April 2022 to August 2022. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied to transcripts to identify codes. A mixed deductive and inductive approach was used for data reduction and sorting.

Results: A total of 32 surgeons were interviewed; most were male and white. Dominant themes for firearm storage practices were based on (1) attitudes; (2) perceived norms; (3) personal agency; and (4) intention of firearm use. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms for surgeons owning firearms for self-defence.

Conclusions: Storage practices in this sample of firearm-owning surgeons were driven by intent for firearm use, coupled with attitudes, perceived norms and personal agency. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms, especially for surgeons who owned their firearm for self-defence.

背景:一项针对外科医生的美国调查发现,32%的外科医生存放枪支时没有上锁和上膛。本研究探讨了影响外科医生个人枪支存放方法的条件和背景:我们对美国外科学院的英语研究员进行了半结构化访谈,这些研究员曾治疗过因枪支受伤的患者,他们拥有枪支或住在有枪支的家中。从 2022 年 4 月到 2022 年 8 月,我们通过电子邮件和随后的滚雪球式抽样招募参与者。所有访谈都进行了录音和逐字记录。对记录誊本进行了主题分析,以确定代码。采用演绎和归纳相结合的方法对数据进行缩减和分类:共有 32 名外科医生接受了访谈,其中大多数为男性和白人。枪支存储做法的主要主题基于(1)态度;(2)感知规范;(3)个人代理;以及(4)枪支使用意图。对于外科医生拥有枪支用于自卫的态度和认知规范,个人代理往往与之相冲突:在这一拥有枪支的外科医生样本中,枪支储存行为受枪支使用意图、态度、感知规范和个人代理的驱动。个人因素往往与态度和感知规范相冲突,尤其是对于为自卫而拥有枪支的外科医生而言。
{"title":"Exploratory qualitative study of firearm storage practices among surgeons in the USA: contexts and motivations.","authors":"Shelbie D Waddle, Arielle Thomas, Brendan T Campbell, Marian E Betz, Julie K Johnson, Regina Royan, Alexander Ellyin, Angie Jang, Marie L Crandall, Anne M Stey","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045205","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2023-045205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A US survey of surgeons found that 32% store firearms unlocked and loaded. This study explored conditions and contexts impacting personal firearm storage methods among surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with English-speaking fellows of the American College of Surgeons who treated patients injured by firearms and who owned or lived in homes with firearms. Participants were recruited through email and subsequent snowball sampling from April 2022 to August 2022. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied to transcripts to identify codes. A mixed deductive and inductive approach was used for data reduction and sorting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 surgeons were interviewed; most were male and white. Dominant themes for firearm storage practices were based on (1) attitudes; (2) perceived norms; (3) personal agency; and (4) intention of firearm use. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms for surgeons owning firearms for self-defence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Storage practices in this sample of firearm-owning surgeons were driven by intent for firearm use, coupled with attitudes, perceived norms and personal agency. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms, especially for surgeons who owned their firearm for self-defence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and validation of Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries for children aged 0-6 years in China. 中国 0-6 岁儿童家长预防道路交通伤害健康素养量表的开发与验证。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045080
Xiaohong Li, Miaomiao Chen, Yuheng Feng, Xueqi Ma, Jicui Zheng, Hanlin Shen, Jingwei Xia, Kaiyue Chen, Ying Guo, Qianghua Xia, Yu Jiang, Jun Lu, Fengshui Chang

Background: Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in children. Parents' health literacy (HL) is closely related to child safety, especially for the young children. This study aimed to develop an intervention-oriented parent HL scale: Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries (PHLS-PRTIs).

Methods: We developed the scale including four parts: (1) definition and conceptualisation of PHLS-PRTIs; (2) domain and item development; (3) instrument construction; and (4) psychometric property validation. 685 parents participated in process of development (n=333) and validation (n=352). Cronbach's α and test-retest correlation were used to assess reliability. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess validity.

Results: The scale consisted of five domains (access, understand, belief, communication and use) and 16 subdomains. The Cronbach's α for each domain and the whole scale was 0.85, 0.70, 0.87, 0.80, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlations >0.70). Content validity was good (item-level content validity index >0.79, average of the scale-level content validity index >0.80, kappa >0.74). For construct validity for domain understand, χ2/df=1.723, p=0.009, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.0404, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.045, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.910; and for the other four domains, χ2/df=1.840, p<0.001, SRMR=0.043, RMSEA=0.049, CFI=0.958, TLI=0.952.

Conclusions: PHLS-PRTIs was developed and validated by a rigorous process, providing a tool for community doctors to measure parents' HL on child road traffic safety and develop targeted health education interventions.

背景:道路交通伤害是儿童死亡的主要原因。家长的健康素养(HL)与儿童安全密切相关,尤其是对幼儿而言。本研究旨在开发一种以干预为导向的家长健康素养量表:父母预防道路交通伤害健康素养量表(PHLS-PRTIs):我们开发的量表包括四个部分:(1)PHLS-PRTIs 的定义和概念化;(2)领域和项目开发;(3)工具构建;(4)心理测量学特性验证。685 名家长参与了开发(人数=333)和验证(人数=352)过程。Cronbach's α 和测试-再测试相关性用于评估信度。内容效度和结构效度用于评估效度:量表包括五个领域(获取、理解、信念、交流和使用)和 16 个子领域。各领域和整个量表的 Cronbach's α 分别为 0.85、0.70、0.87、0.80、0.79 和 0.85。重测信度可以接受(类内相关大于 0.70)。内容效度良好(项目级内容效度指数大于 0.79,量表级内容效度指数平均值大于 0.80,kappa 大于 0.74)。对于理解领域的建构效度,χ2/df=1.723,p=0.009,标准化均方根残差(SRR)=0.0404,均方根近似误差(RMSEA)=0.045,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.942,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.910;对于其他四个领域的建构效度,χ2/df=1.840,p结论:PHLS-PRTIs经过严格的程序开发和验证,为社区医生测量家长对儿童道路交通安全的HL和制定有针对性的健康教育干预措施提供了工具。
{"title":"Development and validation of Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries for children aged 0-6 years in China.","authors":"Xiaohong Li, Miaomiao Chen, Yuheng Feng, Xueqi Ma, Jicui Zheng, Hanlin Shen, Jingwei Xia, Kaiyue Chen, Ying Guo, Qianghua Xia, Yu Jiang, Jun Lu, Fengshui Chang","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045080","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2023-045080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in children. Parents' health literacy (HL) is closely related to child safety, especially for the young children. This study aimed to develop an intervention-oriented parent HL scale: Parents' Health Literacy Scale on Preventing Road Traffic Injuries (PHLS-PRTIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the scale including four parts: (1) definition and conceptualisation of PHLS-PRTIs; (2) domain and item development; (3) instrument construction; and (4) psychometric property validation. 685 parents participated in process of development (n=333) and validation (n=352). Cronbach's α and test-retest correlation were used to assess reliability. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale consisted of five domains (access, understand, belief, communication and use) and 16 subdomains. The Cronbach's α for each domain and the whole scale was 0.85, 0.70, 0.87, 0.80, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlations >0.70). Content validity was good (item-level content validity index >0.79, average of the scale-level content validity index >0.80, kappa >0.74). For construct validity for domain understand, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.723, p=0.009, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.0404, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.045, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.910; and for the other four domains, χ<sup>2</sup>/df=1.840, p<0.001, SRMR=0.043, RMSEA=0.049, CFI=0.958, TLI=0.952.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PHLS-PRTIs was developed and validated by a rigorous process, providing a tool for community doctors to measure parents' HL on child road traffic safety and develop targeted health education interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do sports utility vehicles (SUVs) and light truck vehicles (LTVs) cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars in the case of a crash? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 在碰撞事故中,运动型多用途车(suv)和轻型卡车(ltv)对行人和骑自行车者造成的伤害是否比乘用车更严重?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2024-045613
Elsa Robinson, Phil Edwards, Anthony Laverty, Anna Goodman

Questions: In the case of a road traffic crash, do sports utility vehicles (SUVs) and light truck vehicles (LTVs) cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars? Does any effect differ between adults and children?

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: MEDLINE, TRID and Global Index Medicus were searched up to September 2024, with no restrictions by setting or language.

Inclusion criteria: Eligible studies had to compare injury severity between pedestrians and/or cyclists hit by an SUV or LTV versus a passenger car. Only sources using real-world crash data were included.

Main outcome measure: Injury severity, defined either as 'fatal versus non-fatal injury' or as 'killed or seriously injured (KSI) versus slight injury'.

Results: 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results were similar between pedestrians and cyclists. When combining pedestrians and cyclists, the pooled odds of KSI versus slight injury if hit by an SUV/LTV versus a passenger car were higher among adults/all-age samples by 1.24 (95% CI 1.15, 1.34) and higher among children by 1.28 (95% CI 1.19, 1.37). The odds of fatal versus non-fatal injury if hit by an SUV/LTV versus a passenger car increased among adults/all-age samples by 1.44 (95% CI 1.33, 1.56) and among children by 1.82 (95% CI 1.57, 2.11; p=0.006 for heterogeneity by age).

Conclusion: In the case of a crash, SUVs and LTVs cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars. This effect is larger for fatalities than for KSIs, and the fatality effect is particularly large for children. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024597283.

问题:在道路交通碰撞的情况下,运动型多功能车(suv)和轻型卡车(ltv)对行人和骑自行车的人造成的伤害是否比乘用车更严重?成人和儿童的影响有什么不同吗?设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:MEDLINE, TRID和Global Index Medicus检索截止到2024年9月,无设置或语言限制。纳入标准:符合条件的研究必须比较行人和/或骑自行车的人被SUV或LTV与乘用车撞击的伤害严重程度。仅包括使用真实崩溃数据的来源。主要结局指标:伤害严重程度,定义为“致命与非致命伤害”或“死亡或重伤(KSI)与轻伤”。结果:24项研究被纳入meta分析。行人和骑自行车的人的结果相似。当将行人和骑自行车的人结合在一起时,成年人/所有年龄段的样本中,被SUV/LTV撞到的KSI和轻伤的总几率比乘用车高1.24 (95% CI 1.15, 1.34),儿童高1.28 (95% CI 1.19, 1.37)。与乘用车相比,成人/所有年龄段的样本中,SUV/LTV造成致命和非致命伤害的几率增加了1.44 (95% CI 1.33, 1.56),儿童增加了1.82 (95% CI 1.57, 2.11;年龄异质性P =0.006)。结论:在碰撞的情况下,suv和ltv对行人和骑自行车的伤害比乘用车更严重。这种影响对死亡率的影响大于对ksi的影响,对儿童的死亡率影响尤其大。普洛斯彼罗注册号CRD42024597283。
{"title":"Do sports utility vehicles (SUVs) and light truck vehicles (LTVs) cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars in the case of a crash? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Elsa Robinson, Phil Edwards, Anthony Laverty, Anna Goodman","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045613","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2024-045613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Questions: </strong>In the case of a road traffic crash, do sports utility vehicles (SUVs) and light truck vehicles (LTVs) cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars? Does any effect differ between adults and children?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, TRID and Global Index Medicus were searched up to September 2024, with no restrictions by setting or language.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Eligible studies had to compare injury severity between pedestrians and/or cyclists hit by an SUV or LTV versus a passenger car. Only sources using real-world crash data were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Injury severity, defined either as 'fatal versus non-fatal injury' or as 'killed or seriously injured (KSI) versus slight injury'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results were similar between pedestrians and cyclists. When combining pedestrians and cyclists, the pooled odds of KSI versus slight injury if hit by an SUV/LTV versus a passenger car were higher among adults/all-age samples by 1.24 (95% CI 1.15, 1.34) and higher among children by 1.28 (95% CI 1.19, 1.37). The odds of fatal versus non-fatal injury if hit by an SUV/LTV versus a passenger car increased among adults/all-age samples by 1.44 (95% CI 1.33, 1.56) and among children by 1.82 (95% CI 1.57, 2.11; p=0.006 for heterogeneity by age).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the case of a crash, SUVs and LTVs cause more severe injuries to pedestrians and cyclists than passenger cars. This effect is larger for fatalities than for KSIs, and the fatality effect is particularly large for children. <b>PROSPERO registration number</b> CRD42024597283.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143999624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preparing for a meta-analysis of rates: extracting effect sizes and standard errors from studies of count outcomes with person-time denominators. 为比率的荟萃分析做准备:从具有人时间分母的计数结果的研究中提取效应大小和标准误差。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2024-045610
Matthew Spittal

Background: Formulas for the extraction of continuous and binary effect sizes that are entered into a meta-analysis are readily available. Only some formulas for the extraction of count outcomes have been presented previously. The purpose of this methodological article is to present formulas for extracting effect sizes and their standard errors for studies of count outcomes with person-time denominators.

Methods: Formulas for the calculation of the number of events in a study and the corresponding person time in which these events occurred are presented. These formulas are then used to estimate the relevant effect sizes and standard errors of interest. These effect sizes are rates, rate ratios and rate differences for a two-group comparison and rate ratios and rate differences for a difference-in-difference design.

Results: Two studies from the field of suicide prevention are used to demonstrate the extraction of the information required to estimate effect sizes and standard errors. In the first example, the rate ratio for a two-group comparison was 0.957 (standard error of the log rate ratio, 0.035), and the rate difference was -0.56 per 100,000 person years (standard error 0.44). In the second example, the rate ratio for a difference-in-difference analysis was 0.975 (standard error of the log rate ratio 0.036) and the rate difference was -0.30 per 100,000 person years (standard error 0.42).

Conclusions: The application of these formulas enables the calculation of effect sizes that may not have been presented in the original study. This reduces the need to exclude otherwise eligible studies from a meta-analysis, potentially reducing one source of bias.

背景:在荟萃分析中提取连续效应和二元效应的公式是很容易获得的。以前只提出了一些提取计数结果的公式。这篇方法学文章的目的是提出提取效应量及其标准误差的公式,用于研究带有个人时间分母的计数结果。方法:给出了一项研究中事件数的计算公式以及这些事件发生的相应时间。然后使用这些公式来估计相关的效应大小和感兴趣的标准误差。这些效应量是两组比较的比率、比率比和比率差异,以及差中差设计的比率比和比率差异。结果:来自自杀预防领域的两项研究被用来证明提取所需的信息来估计效应大小和标准误差。在第一个示例中,两组比较的比率比率为0.957(对数比率的标准误差为0.035),比率差异为-0.56 / 100,000人年(标准误差为0.44)。在第二个示例中,差中差分析的比率为0.975(对数比率的标准误差为0.036),比率差为每100,000人年-0.30(标准误差为0.42)。结论:这些公式的应用可以计算原研究中可能没有提出的效应量。这减少了从荟萃分析中排除其他合格研究的需要,潜在地减少了一个偏倚来源。
{"title":"Preparing for a meta-analysis of rates: extracting effect sizes and standard errors from studies of count outcomes with person-time denominators.","authors":"Matthew Spittal","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045610","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2024-045610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Formulas for the extraction of continuous and binary effect sizes that are entered into a meta-analysis are readily available. Only some formulas for the extraction of count outcomes have been presented previously. The purpose of this methodological article is to present formulas for extracting effect sizes and their standard errors for studies of count outcomes with person-time denominators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Formulas for the calculation of the number of events in a study and the corresponding person time in which these events occurred are presented. These formulas are then used to estimate the relevant effect sizes and standard errors of interest. These effect sizes are rates, rate ratios and rate differences for a two-group comparison and rate ratios and rate differences for a difference-in-difference design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two studies from the field of suicide prevention are used to demonstrate the extraction of the information required to estimate effect sizes and standard errors. In the first example, the rate ratio for a two-group comparison was 0.957 (standard error of the log rate ratio, 0.035), and the rate difference was -0.56 per 100,000 person years (standard error 0.44). In the second example, the rate ratio for a difference-in-difference analysis was 0.975 (standard error of the log rate ratio 0.036) and the rate difference was -0.30 per 100,000 person years (standard error 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of these formulas enables the calculation of effect sizes that may not have been presented in the original study. This reduces the need to exclude otherwise eligible studies from a meta-analysis, potentially reducing one source of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"176-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143999889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consumer product-related female genital injuries in the USA from 2013 to 2022. 2013 年至 2022 年美国与消费品相关的女性生殖器伤害。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045166
Kevin Danis Li, Sultan Al Azzawi, Nizar Hakam, Behzad Abbasi, Umar Ghaffar, Chibuzor Nwachukwu, Hiren V Patel, Benjamin N Breyer

Background: Consumer product-related genital injuries in females across all age groups are understudied. Existing research focuses primarily on paediatric populations. We aimed to determine characteristics, trends and predictors of hospitalisation.

Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried for female genital injuries from 2013 to 2022. We stratified our population into four age groups (<18, 18-34, 35-54, >54 years). Automated text matching and manual reviews were employed for variable extraction. χ2 tests and logistic regression were conducted, accounting for survey design and weights.

Results: 9054 cases representing a national estimate of 252 329 injuries (95% CI 188 059 to 316 599) were identified. Paediatric injuries were most common (61%) and seniors had the highest hospitalisation rates (28%). Falls were common in paediatric (51%) and senior (48%) groups, whereas self-induced and topical application injuries were more frequent among adults aged 18-34 and 35-54. Injuries predominantly involved playground equipment and bicycles in children, razors and massage devices in adults aged 18-34 and 35-54 and household structures in seniors. Hospitalisation increased over the decade from 7% to 9%; significant predictors of hospitalisation were Asian race (OR=3.39, 95% CI 1.83 to 6.30), fractures (OR=7.98, 95% CI 4.85 to 13.1) and urethral injury (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.63).

Conclusions: Our study identifies distinct patterns in female genital injuries across ages. In the paediatric cohort, injuries are often linked to playgrounds and bicycles. For adults, grooming products are frequently implicated. Seniors commonly suffer injuries from household structures such as bathtubs. These patterns may inform discussions on tailored preventive strategies.

背景:与消费品相关的各年龄组女性生殖器损伤研究不足。现有研究主要集中在儿科人群。我们旨在确定住院治疗的特征、趋势和预测因素:我们查询了全国电子伤害监测系统数据库中 2013 年至 2022 年的女性生殖器伤害数据。我们将人群分为四个年龄组(54 岁)。我们采用了自动文本匹配和人工审核来提取变量。在考虑调查设计和权重的情况下,我们进行了χ2 检验和逻辑回归:共发现 9054 个病例,全国估计受伤人数为 252 329 人(95% CI 188 059 至 316 599)。儿童受伤最为常见(61%),老年人住院率最高(28%)。摔倒在儿童组(51%)和老年人组(48%)中很常见,而在 18-34 岁和 35-54 岁的成年人中,自伤和外用药造成的伤害更为常见。儿童受伤主要涉及游乐场设备和自行车,18-34 岁和 35-54 岁的成年人主要涉及剃须刀和按摩器,老年人则主要涉及家庭结构。在这十年间,住院率从7%上升到9%;住院的重要预测因素是亚洲人种(OR=3.39,95% CI 1.83至6.30)、骨折(OR=7.98,95% CI 4.85至13.1)和尿道损伤(OR=3.15,95% CI 1.30至7.63):我们的研究发现了不同年龄段女性生殖器损伤的不同模式。在儿科人群中,伤害通常与游乐场和自行车有关。成人则经常与美容产品有关。老年人通常是在浴缸等家居设施中受伤。这些模式可为关于有针对性的预防战略的讨论提供信息。
{"title":"Consumer product-related female genital injuries in the USA from 2013 to 2022.","authors":"Kevin Danis Li, Sultan Al Azzawi, Nizar Hakam, Behzad Abbasi, Umar Ghaffar, Chibuzor Nwachukwu, Hiren V Patel, Benjamin N Breyer","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045166","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2023-045166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consumer product-related genital injuries in females across all age groups are understudied. Existing research focuses primarily on paediatric populations. We aimed to determine characteristics, trends and predictors of hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried for female genital injuries from 2013 to 2022. We stratified our population into four age groups (<18, 18-34, 35-54, >54 years). Automated text matching and manual reviews were employed for variable extraction. χ<sup>2</sup> tests and logistic regression were conducted, accounting for survey design and weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9054 cases representing a national estimate of 252 329 injuries (95% CI 188 059 to 316 599) were identified. Paediatric injuries were most common (61%) and seniors had the highest hospitalisation rates (28%). Falls were common in paediatric (51%) and senior (48%) groups, whereas self-induced and topical application injuries were more frequent among adults aged 18-34 and 35-54. Injuries predominantly involved playground equipment and bicycles in children, razors and massage devices in adults aged 18-34 and 35-54 and household structures in seniors. Hospitalisation increased over the decade from 7% to 9%; significant predictors of hospitalisation were Asian race (OR=3.39, 95% CI 1.83 to 6.30), fractures (OR=7.98, 95% CI 4.85 to 13.1) and urethral injury (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identifies distinct patterns in female genital injuries across ages. In the paediatric cohort, injuries are often linked to playgrounds and bicycles. For adults, grooming products are frequently implicated. Seniors commonly suffer injuries from household structures such as bathtubs. These patterns may inform discussions on tailored preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in fatal paediatric unintentional injury: what is going on? 致命儿科意外伤害的趋势:发生了什么?
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2025-045675
Frederick P Rivara

In recent years, the reduction in rates of fatal unintentional injuries to children in the USA has not only plateaued, beginning before the pandemic, but has reversed, with increases across most mechanisms of injury. This study seeks to understand the reasons for this trend, focusing on unintentional injuries to children aged 1-14 years in 2001-2023 and on injuries with the highest fatality rates and with the most substantial increases in the last few years.The highest rate of fatalities and most substantial changes were due to motor vehicle crashes, drowning, fires and burns. Many factors that are associated with the risk of injury fatality actually decreased in prevalence over the last decade while the fatality rates were plateauing and then increasing. These include improved motor vehicle and highway and roadway safety designs, lower rates of cigarette smoking, more homes with carbon monoxide alarms, fewer mobile homes, higher life-jacket use, fewer small recreational boats and decreases in child poverty. Increases in emotional and behavioural disorders are not likely responsible for changes in unintentional injury fatalities in this age group. An important contributor to injury, particularly among the racial groups experiencing the greatest change in the mortality trajectory, is the sociocultural economic environment in which children live, learn and play. Smartphone use by teens and caregivers was the one risk factor which dramatically increased over the last decade, and distraction from mobile phone use stands out as likely the greatest culprit in this increase in fatalities.

近年来,美国儿童致命意外伤害率的下降不仅在大流行之前就开始趋于平稳,而且出现了逆转,大多数伤害机制都有所增加。本研究旨在了解这一趋势的原因,重点关注2001-2023年期间1-14岁儿童的意外伤害,以及过去几年死亡率最高、增幅最大的伤害。最高的死亡率和最重大的变化是由于机动车碰撞、溺水、火灾和烧伤。在过去十年中,许多与伤害死亡风险相关的因素实际上在患病率上有所下降,而死亡率则处于稳定状态,然后又有所上升。这些措施包括改进机动车辆、高速公路和道路安全设计、降低吸烟率、更多的家庭安装一氧化碳报警器、减少移动房屋、增加救生衣的使用、减少小型娱乐船以及减少儿童贫困。情绪和行为障碍的增加不太可能导致这一年龄组意外伤害死亡人数的变化。造成伤害的一个重要因素,特别是在死亡率变化最大的种族群体中,是儿童生活、学习和玩耍的社会文化经济环境。青少年和照顾者使用智能手机是过去十年中急剧增加的一个风险因素,而手机使用的分心可能是导致死亡人数增加的最大罪魁祸首。
{"title":"Trends in fatal paediatric unintentional injury: what is going on?","authors":"Frederick P Rivara","doi":"10.1136/ip-2025-045675","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2025-045675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the reduction in rates of fatal unintentional injuries to children in the USA has not only plateaued, beginning before the pandemic, but has reversed, with increases across most mechanisms of injury. This study seeks to understand the reasons for this trend, focusing on unintentional injuries to children aged 1-14 years in 2001-2023 and on injuries with the highest fatality rates and with the most substantial increases in the last few years.The highest rate of fatalities and most substantial changes were due to motor vehicle crashes, drowning, fires and burns. Many factors that are associated with the risk of injury fatality actually decreased in prevalence over the last decade while the fatality rates were plateauing and then increasing. These include improved motor vehicle and highway and roadway safety designs, lower rates of cigarette smoking, more homes with carbon monoxide alarms, fewer mobile homes, higher life-jacket use, fewer small recreational boats and decreases in child poverty. Increases in emotional and behavioural disorders are not likely responsible for changes in unintentional injury fatalities in this age group. An important contributor to injury, particularly among the racial groups experiencing the greatest change in the mortality trajectory, is the sociocultural economic environment in which children live, learn and play. Smartphone use by teens and caregivers was the one risk factor which dramatically increased over the last decade, and distraction from mobile phone use stands out as likely the greatest culprit in this increase in fatalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"168-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143978812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Circumstantial variables preceding firearm suicide among females with and without mobility disability in the USA: comparative analysis using data from the National Violent Death Reporting System. 美国行动不便和行动不便女性持枪自杀前的间接变量:利用国家暴力死亡报告系统数据进行的比较分析。
IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1136/ip-2023-045195
Julian Takagi-Stewart, Laura C Prater, Erika Marts, Pooja Ayachit, Tiago S Jesus

Background: Mobility disability impacts approximately 12% of the US population; females are overrepresented among persons with mobility disability. Those with mobility disability are at increased risk of suicide compared with their non-disabled counterparts. Suicide using a firearm has increased among females in the last two decades. This study aims to describe and explore significant circumstantial variables (eg, socio-demographic, health indicators) preceding firearm suicide among females with mobility disability as compared with females without mobility disability.

Methods: This is a secondary comparative, retrospective analysis of the narrative data from the National Violent Death Reporting System Restricted Access Database. Persons with mobility disability were identified through text mining and manual review and subsequently analysed with a summative form of content analysis. Pearson/Fisher's X2 or t-tests were used to assess differences in the circumstantial variables between those with and without mobility disabilities.

Results: Among female firearm suicide decedents, persons with mobility disability were more commonly older (p<0.001), identified as a homemaker (p<0.001), were perceived to be in a depressed mood before death (p<0.05), had a history of suicidal thoughts (p<0.05) and were perceived to have physical pain (p<0.001); they less commonly had relationship problems (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Females with mobility disability who die by firearm suicide may be differentiated from suicide decedents without mobility disability by age, employment status, depressive mood, relationship problems and physical pain. The significance of these variables as independent risk factors for firearm suicide may be tested with prospective study designs, which in turn may inform the development of targeted or disability-inclusive prevention strategies.

背景:美国约有 12% 的人口患有行动不便症;女性在行动不便者中所占比例较高。与非残疾人相比,行动不便者的自杀风险更高。在过去二十年中,女性使用枪支自杀的人数有所增加。本研究旨在描述和探讨行动不便女性与非行动不便女性持枪自杀前的重要环境变量(如社会人口学、健康指标等):这是对国家暴力死亡报告系统限制访问数据库中的叙述性数据进行的二次比较和回顾性分析。通过文本挖掘和人工审核确定了行动不便者,随后对其进行了总结性的内容分析。采用皮尔逊/费舍尔 X2 或 t 检验来评估行动不便者与非行动不便者之间的环境变量差异:结果:在持枪自杀的女性死者中,行动不便者通常年龄较大(p结论:在年龄、就业状况、抑郁情绪、人际关系问题和身体疼痛等方面,有行动障碍的女性持枪自杀者可能有别于无行动障碍的自杀者。这些变量作为持枪自杀的独立风险因素的重要性可通过前瞻性研究设计进行检验,进而为制定有针对性或兼顾残疾问题的预防策略提供信息。
{"title":"Circumstantial variables preceding firearm suicide among females with and without mobility disability in the USA: comparative analysis using data from the National Violent Death Reporting System.","authors":"Julian Takagi-Stewart, Laura C Prater, Erika Marts, Pooja Ayachit, Tiago S Jesus","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045195","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ip-2023-045195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobility disability impacts approximately 12% of the US population; females are overrepresented among persons with mobility disability. Those with mobility disability are at increased risk of suicide compared with their non-disabled counterparts. Suicide using a firearm has increased among females in the last two decades. This study aims to describe and explore significant circumstantial variables (eg, socio-demographic, health indicators) preceding firearm suicide among females with mobility disability as compared with females without mobility disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary comparative, retrospective analysis of the narrative data from the National Violent Death Reporting System Restricted Access Database. Persons with mobility disability were identified through text mining and manual review and subsequently analysed with a summative form of content analysis. Pearson/Fisher's X<sup>2</sup> or t-tests were used to assess differences in the circumstantial variables between those with and without mobility disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among female firearm suicide decedents, persons with mobility disability were more commonly older (p<0.001), identified as a homemaker (p<0.001), were perceived to be in a depressed mood before death (p<0.05), had a history of suicidal thoughts (p<0.05) and were perceived to have physical pain (p<0.001); they less commonly had relationship problems (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females with mobility disability who die by firearm suicide may be differentiated from suicide decedents without mobility disability by age, employment status, depressive mood, relationship problems and physical pain. The significance of these variables as independent risk factors for firearm suicide may be tested with prospective study designs, which in turn may inform the development of targeted or disability-inclusive prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Injury Prevention
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1