Local excision versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer patients with clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04720-w
Lu Jin, Kuo Zheng, Yonggang Hong, Enda Yu, Liqiang Hao, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Local excision versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer patients with clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Lu Jin, Kuo Zheng, Yonggang Hong, Enda Yu, Liqiang Hao, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04720-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Local excision is an effective approach for managing rectal cancer exhibiting substantial regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes between local excision and total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients achieving clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study that includes a consecutive series of rectal cancer patients who responded well to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. A total of 180 rectal cancer patients at a single institution during a 12-year period are included. The main outcomes include short-term outcomes, oncological outcomes, and functional outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Sixty-one (33.9%) received local excision and 119 (66.1%) received total mesorectal excision. The baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups. The local excision group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001). 3-year overall survival rates were 97.5% (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) and 95.5% (95% CI, 0.91-1.00) between the two groups (p = 0.38). The local excision group exhibited significantly higher 3-year local recurrence rates 15.7% (95% CI, 0.74-0.97) vs 4.2% (95% CI, 0.92-1.00) (p = 0.017), yet lower 3-year distant metastasis rates 9.6% (95% CI, 0.82-1.00) vs 12.6% (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) (p = 0.33) and lower 3-year disease-free survival rates 76.8% (95% CI, 0.64-0.92) vs 84.7% (95% CI, 0.78-0.92) (p = 0.56) comparing with the total mesorectal excision group. The local excision group demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes compared with the total mesorectal excision group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who achieve either clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are suitable candidates for local excision. The local excision group demonstrated superior short-term and functional outcomes, and the oncological outcomes were not compromised.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04720-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Local excision is an effective approach for managing rectal cancer exhibiting substantial regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes between local excision and total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients achieving clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that includes a consecutive series of rectal cancer patients who responded well to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. A total of 180 rectal cancer patients at a single institution during a 12-year period are included. The main outcomes include short-term outcomes, oncological outcomes, and functional outcomes between the two groups.

Results: A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Sixty-one (33.9%) received local excision and 119 (66.1%) received total mesorectal excision. The baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups. The local excision group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001). 3-year overall survival rates were 97.5% (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) and 95.5% (95% CI, 0.91-1.00) between the two groups (p = 0.38). The local excision group exhibited significantly higher 3-year local recurrence rates 15.7% (95% CI, 0.74-0.97) vs 4.2% (95% CI, 0.92-1.00) (p = 0.017), yet lower 3-year distant metastasis rates 9.6% (95% CI, 0.82-1.00) vs 12.6% (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) (p = 0.33) and lower 3-year disease-free survival rates 76.8% (95% CI, 0.64-0.92) vs 84.7% (95% CI, 0.78-0.92) (p = 0.56) comparing with the total mesorectal excision group. The local excision group demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes compared with the total mesorectal excision group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients who achieve either clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are suitable candidates for local excision. The local excision group demonstrated superior short-term and functional outcomes, and the oncological outcomes were not compromised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助化放疗后临床完全或接近完全反应的直肠癌患者采用局部切除术还是全直肠系膜切除术?
目的:局部切除术是治疗新辅助化放疗后出现实质性消退的直肠癌的有效方法。本研究旨在比较新辅助化放疗后获得临床完全或接近完全反应的直肠癌患者接受局部切除术和全直肠系膜切除术的结果:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括一系列对新辅助化放疗和手术反应良好的直肠癌患者。研究共纳入了一家医疗机构在 12 年间收治的 180 名直肠癌患者。主要结果包括两组患者的短期疗效、肿瘤疗效和功能疗效:研究共纳入 180 名患者。结果:研究共纳入 180 名患者,其中 61 人(33.9%)接受了局部切除术,119 人(66.1%)接受了全直肠系膜切除术。两组患者的基线特征基本平衡。局部切除组的手术时间明显更短、失血量更少、住院时间更短(P新辅助化放疗后获得临床完全或接近完全反应的患者适合进行局部切除术。局部切除组的短期疗效和功能疗效更佳,而肿瘤学疗效并未受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study. Patient-reported performance status and postoperative complications in elective colorectal cancer surgery. Biomarkers of systemic treatment response: MR images of intratumoral fat deposition in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after chemotherapy. Prognostic Value of Baseline Skeletal Muscle Index in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Fruquintinib: A multi-center real world analysis. Ambulatory management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AmbUDiv study): a multicentre, propensity score matching study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1