Mary O Fakunle, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Peter R Carroll
{"title":"Targeted Biopsy Is Sufficient for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Mary O Fakunle, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Peter R Carroll","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. multiparametric MRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA <20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade Group (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion, of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. multiparametric MRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.
Materials and methods: Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA <20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade Group (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.
Results: Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.
Conclusions: In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion, of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.