Below-knee amputation with an ultrasonic scalpel: evaluation of early postoperative clinical outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2021.0015
Hyun Jung Ryoo, Yeon Ji Lee, Jin-Soo Lim, Hyung-Sup Shim
{"title":"Below-knee amputation with an ultrasonic scalpel: evaluation of early postoperative clinical outcomes.","authors":"Hyun Jung Ryoo, Yeon Ji Lee, Jin-Soo Lim, Hyung-Sup Shim","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the development of microscopic reconstructive techniques for lower limb salvage, major limb amputation is still required for critical, unsalvageable lower leg wounds, with steadily increasing estimates of major limb amputations. In this study, the authors highlight a surgical technique for below-knee (BK) amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel, and evaluate its safety and effectiveness compared with the conventional method of using surgical blades.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Republic of Korea, on patients who underwent BK amputation between October 2012 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to two groups: amputation using classical methods, such as surgical blades and electrocautery (group A); and amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel (group B). Numerous perioperative factors, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and recovery time were examined. The present study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients (16 in group A and 25 in group B) were included in this study. Operation time was significantly shorter in group B (p=0.001) and intraoperative blood loss was lower (p=0.011). Wound healing time did not vary between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the use of an ultrasonic scalpel for lower limb amputation was effective in reducing operation time and blood loss, which may be helpful in improving outcomes for patients with comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"33 Sup10a","pages":"ccxii-ccxix"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the development of microscopic reconstructive techniques for lower limb salvage, major limb amputation is still required for critical, unsalvageable lower leg wounds, with steadily increasing estimates of major limb amputations. In this study, the authors highlight a surgical technique for below-knee (BK) amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel, and evaluate its safety and effectiveness compared with the conventional method of using surgical blades.

Method: A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Republic of Korea, on patients who underwent BK amputation between October 2012 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to two groups: amputation using classical methods, such as surgical blades and electrocautery (group A); and amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel (group B). Numerous perioperative factors, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and recovery time were examined. The present study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

Results: A total of 41 patients (16 in group A and 25 in group B) were included in this study. Operation time was significantly shorter in group B (p=0.001) and intraoperative blood loss was lower (p=0.011). Wound healing time did not vary between groups.

Conclusion: In this study, the use of an ultrasonic scalpel for lower limb amputation was effective in reducing operation time and blood loss, which may be helpful in improving outcomes for patients with comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用超声刀进行膝下截肢术:术后早期临床效果评估。
目的:尽管用于下肢救治的显微重建技术得到了发展,但对于严重的、无法挽救的小腿创伤,仍然需要进行大肢截肢,而且大肢截肢的估计数字还在稳步上升。在本研究中,作者重点介绍了一种使用超声刀进行膝下(BK)截肢的手术技术,并评估了其与使用手术刀片的传统方法相比的安全性和有效性:大韩民国圣文森特医院整形外科对 2012 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受 BK 截肢手术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。患者被分为两组:使用手术刀片和电烧等传统方法截肢(A 组);使用超声刀截肢(B 组)。本研究考察了许多围手术期因素,如手术时间、术中失血量、术后并发症和恢复时间。本研究遵循了 STROBE 指南:本研究共纳入 41 名患者(A 组 16 人,B 组 25 人)。B 组的手术时间明显更短(P=0.001),术中失血量更少(P=0.011)。各组的伤口愈合时间没有差异:在这项研究中,使用超声刀进行下肢截肢手术能有效缩短手术时间和减少失血量,这可能有助于改善合并症患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Using patient-reported experiences to inform the use of foam dressings for hard-to-heal wounds: perspectives from a wound care expert panel. Wound healing after surgical therapy for multiple myeloma: a case-control study. A dedicated wound care module for third-year baccalaureate nurses: does it increase their knowledge and confidence? A new portable negative pressure wound therapy device: a prospective study investigating clinical outcomes. Biofilms and antibacterial sutures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1