Kristina L Faurschou, Aaron J Clasky, Jeffrey Watchorn, Jennifer Tram Su, Nancy T Li, Alison P McGuigan, Frank X Gu
{"title":"Lateral Assessment of Mucomimetic Hydrogels to Evaluate Correlation between Microscopic and Macroscopic Properties.","authors":"Kristina L Faurschou, Aaron J Clasky, Jeffrey Watchorn, Jennifer Tram Su, Nancy T Li, Alison P McGuigan, Frank X Gu","doi":"10.1002/mabi.202400146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A major limitation in the development of mucosal drug delivery systems is the design of in vitro models that accurately reflect in vivo conditions. Traditionally, models seek to mimic characteristics of physiological mucus, often focusing on property-specific trial metrics such as rheological behavior or diffusion of a nanoparticle of interest. Despite the success of these models, translation from in vitro results to in vivo trials is limited. As a result, several authors have called for work to develop standardized testing methodologies and characterize the influence of model properties on drug delivery performance. To this end, a series of trials is performed on 12 mucomimetic hydrogels reproduced from literature. Experiments show that there is no consistent correlation between barrier performance and rheological or microstructural properties of the tested mucomimetic hydrogels. In addition, the permeability of both mucopenetrating and mucoadhesive nanoparticles is assessed, revealing non-obvious variations in barrier properties such as the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in different models. These results demonstrate the limitations of predicting mucomimetic behavior with common characterization techniques and highlight the importance of testing barrier performance with multiple nanoparticle formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18103,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular bioscience","volume":" ","pages":"e2400146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202400146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A major limitation in the development of mucosal drug delivery systems is the design of in vitro models that accurately reflect in vivo conditions. Traditionally, models seek to mimic characteristics of physiological mucus, often focusing on property-specific trial metrics such as rheological behavior or diffusion of a nanoparticle of interest. Despite the success of these models, translation from in vitro results to in vivo trials is limited. As a result, several authors have called for work to develop standardized testing methodologies and characterize the influence of model properties on drug delivery performance. To this end, a series of trials is performed on 12 mucomimetic hydrogels reproduced from literature. Experiments show that there is no consistent correlation between barrier performance and rheological or microstructural properties of the tested mucomimetic hydrogels. In addition, the permeability of both mucopenetrating and mucoadhesive nanoparticles is assessed, revealing non-obvious variations in barrier properties such as the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in different models. These results demonstrate the limitations of predicting mucomimetic behavior with common characterization techniques and highlight the importance of testing barrier performance with multiple nanoparticle formulations.
期刊介绍:
Macromolecular Bioscience is a leading journal at the intersection of polymer and materials sciences with life science and medicine. With an Impact Factor of 2.895 (2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2019)), it is currently ranked among the top biomaterials and polymer journals.
Macromolecular Bioscience offers an attractive mixture of high-quality Reviews, Feature Articles, Communications, and Full Papers.
With average reviewing times below 30 days, publication times of 2.5 months and listing in all major indices, including Medline, Macromolecular Bioscience is the journal of choice for your best contributions at the intersection of polymer and life sciences.