Comparison of survival between lobectomy and trisegmentectomy for clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper segment of the lung.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-02007-x
Tatsuo Nakagawa, Ei Miyamoto, Yuki Ohsumi, Masashi Gotoh, Tomoaki Matsuoka, Masashi Kobayashi, Mitsugu Omasa, Norihito Okumura
{"title":"Comparison of survival between lobectomy and trisegmentectomy for clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper segment of the lung.","authors":"Tatsuo Nakagawa, Ei Miyamoto, Yuki Ohsumi, Masashi Gotoh, Tomoaki Matsuoka, Masashi Kobayashi, Mitsugu Omasa, Norihito Okumura","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02007-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left upper trisegmentectomy is expected to be as curative as lobectomy for lung cancer because the left upper lobe is anatomically the same as the combined upper and middle lobes of the right lung and the procedure can provide a sufficient surgical margin. In the present multicenter study, we compared the results of trisegmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper lung cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 lung cancer in the left upper segment who underwent lobectomy or trisegmentectomy between January 2006 and June 2022. The trisegmentectomy group (S group) and lobectomy group (L group) comprised 33 and 132 patients, respectively. Comparisons of postoperative survival revealed no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.761) or disease-free survival (p = 0.508) between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in survival after adjustment for clinical factors by Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching. Local recurrence was significantly more predominant in the S group than in the L group (p = 0.006). The S group had a worse postoperative survival than the L group when the tumor was located in anterior segment. Trisegmentectomy can provide an equivalent postoperative survive to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper segment lung cancer except in patients with tumor in anterior segment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02007-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left upper trisegmentectomy is expected to be as curative as lobectomy for lung cancer because the left upper lobe is anatomically the same as the combined upper and middle lobes of the right lung and the procedure can provide a sufficient surgical margin. In the present multicenter study, we compared the results of trisegmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper lung cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 lung cancer in the left upper segment who underwent lobectomy or trisegmentectomy between January 2006 and June 2022. The trisegmentectomy group (S group) and lobectomy group (L group) comprised 33 and 132 patients, respectively. Comparisons of postoperative survival revealed no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.761) or disease-free survival (p = 0.508) between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in survival after adjustment for clinical factors by Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching. Local recurrence was significantly more predominant in the S group than in the L group (p = 0.006). The S group had a worse postoperative survival than the L group when the tumor was located in anterior segment. Trisegmentectomy can provide an equivalent postoperative survive to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper segment lung cancer except in patients with tumor in anterior segment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床分期为 T1c-2aN0M0 左上肺段非小细胞肺癌的肺叶切除术与三段切除术的生存率比较。
左上肺三叶切除术有望与肺叶切除术一样治愈肺癌,因为左上肺叶在解剖学上与右肺上叶和中叶的结合部相同,而且该手术可以提供足够的手术切缘。在本项多中心研究中,我们比较了临床分期为T1c-2aN0M0的左上肺癌患者接受三叶切除术和肺叶切除术的结果。我们回顾性分析了2006年1月至2022年6月期间接受肺叶切除术或三段切除术的临床分期为T1c-2aN0M0的左上肺癌患者的治疗结果。三段切除术组(S 组)和肺叶切除术组(L 组)分别有 33 名和 132 名患者。术后生存率比较显示,两组患者的总生存率(P = 0.761)和无病生存率(P = 0.508)无显著差异。通过考克斯比例危险模型和倾向评分匹配对临床因素进行调整后,两组患者的生存率也无明显差异。S组的局部复发率明显高于L组(P = 0.006)。当肿瘤位于前段时,S 组的术后生存率低于 L 组。对于临床分期为T1c-2aN0M0的左上肺癌患者,除肿瘤位于前段的患者外,三段切除术的术后生存率与肺叶切除术相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with apatinib and camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a protocol for a single-arm phase II trial. Reducing the positive margins rate for anal melanoma in the modern era: a national propensity score matched study. Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Full-robotic liver resection of segment V-Vi using the harmonic ace curved shears and the hanging technique: an easy way to do it. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic, retro-muscular, and open mesh repair techniques for ventral and incisional hernias: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1