A multicountry study on the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Sleep Preoccupation Scale (SPS) using both classical testing theory and item response theory.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02038-4
Salma Yasser Abu-Saleh, Wajiha Irsheid, Waqar Husain, Achraf Ammar, Hadeel Ghazzawi, Khaled Trabelsi, Ahmed S BaHammam, Zahra Saif, Amir Pakpour, Haitham Jahrami
{"title":"A multicountry study on the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Sleep Preoccupation Scale (SPS) using both classical testing theory and item response theory.","authors":"Salma Yasser Abu-Saleh, Wajiha Irsheid, Waqar Husain, Achraf Ammar, Hadeel Ghazzawi, Khaled Trabelsi, Ahmed S BaHammam, Zahra Saif, Amir Pakpour, Haitham Jahrami","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02038-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep distrurbances involves daytime preoccupation about sleep, which plays a critical role in perpetuating sleep disturbances. Recent cognitive models highlight the importance of daytime processes, like processing sleep-related information and interpretations during waking hours, in influencing sleep quality and quantity. The Sleep Preoccupation Scale (SPS) quantifies this daytime cognitive activity related to sleep. This study aimed to translate and validate an Arabic version of the SPS for assessing sleep preoccupation among Arabic speakers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>523 Arabic speakers (mean age 23.6 years, 75% female) from four countries completed the Arabic SPS alongside the Athens Insomnia Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale, and the Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire (APSQ). The sample repeated the SPS after two weeks for test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the SPS's two-factor structure. Internal consistency, item response theory, and convergent validity with the other scales were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model's fit. Measurement invariance results suggest that the SPS exhibits a similar basic factor structure across both insomnia and non-insomnia groups. The Arabic SPS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92, McDonald's ω = 0.92) and two-way mixed effects, consistency, single rater/measurement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95). Most items exhibited satisfactory item response theory fit statistics and discrimination. The SPS total score showed strong positive correlations with insomnia severity (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), generalized anxiety (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), and sleep-related anxiety/preoccupation (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), demonstrating convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Arabic version of the SPS demonstrated good psychometric properties and validity, supporting its use for assessing sleep preoccupation among Arabic speakers. This culturally-adapted version enhances sleep assessment capabilities for improving insomnia understanding and treatment within Arabic-speaking populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02038-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sleep distrurbances involves daytime preoccupation about sleep, which plays a critical role in perpetuating sleep disturbances. Recent cognitive models highlight the importance of daytime processes, like processing sleep-related information and interpretations during waking hours, in influencing sleep quality and quantity. The Sleep Preoccupation Scale (SPS) quantifies this daytime cognitive activity related to sleep. This study aimed to translate and validate an Arabic version of the SPS for assessing sleep preoccupation among Arabic speakers.

Methods: 523 Arabic speakers (mean age 23.6 years, 75% female) from four countries completed the Arabic SPS alongside the Athens Insomnia Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale, and the Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire (APSQ). The sample repeated the SPS after two weeks for test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the SPS's two-factor structure. Internal consistency, item response theory, and convergent validity with the other scales were examined.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model's fit. Measurement invariance results suggest that the SPS exhibits a similar basic factor structure across both insomnia and non-insomnia groups. The Arabic SPS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92, McDonald's ω = 0.92) and two-way mixed effects, consistency, single rater/measurement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95). Most items exhibited satisfactory item response theory fit statistics and discrimination. The SPS total score showed strong positive correlations with insomnia severity (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), generalized anxiety (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), and sleep-related anxiety/preoccupation (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), demonstrating convergent validity.

Conclusion: The Arabic version of the SPS demonstrated good psychometric properties and validity, supporting its use for assessing sleep preoccupation among Arabic speakers. This culturally-adapted version enhances sleep assessment capabilities for improving insomnia understanding and treatment within Arabic-speaking populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用经典测试理论和项目反应理论,对阿拉伯语版睡眠先入为主量表(SPS)的心理测量特性进行多国研究。
背景:睡眠障碍涉及白天对睡眠的关注,这在睡眠障碍的持续存在中起着至关重要的作用。最近的认知模型强调了白天过程的重要性,如在清醒时处理与睡眠相关的信息和解释,对睡眠质量和数量产生影响。睡眠先入为主量表(SPS)可以量化白天与睡眠有关的认知活动。方法:来自四个国家的 523 名阿拉伯语使用者(平均年龄 23.6 岁,75% 为女性)在填写阿拉伯语 SPS 问卷的同时,还填写了雅典失眠量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表以及焦虑和睡眠先入为主问卷 (APSQ)。样本在两周后重复进行 SPS 测试,以确保测试的可靠性。确认性因素分析评估了 SPS 的双因素结构。此外,还考察了内部一致性、项目反应理论以及与其他量表的收敛效度:结果:确认性因素分析支持双因素模型的拟合。测量不变性结果表明,SPS 在失眠组和非失眠组中表现出相似的基本因子结构。阿拉伯语 SPS 表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.92,McDonald's ω = 0.92)和双向混合效应、一致性、单一评分者/测量者类内相关系数(ICC)测试-再测可靠性(ICC = 0.95)。大多数项目显示出令人满意的项目反应理论拟合统计量和区分度。SPS 总分与失眠严重程度呈很强的正相关(r = 0.48,p 结论:SPS 与失眠严重程度呈很强的正相关(r = 0.48,p 结论:SPS 与失眠严重程度呈很强的正相关):阿拉伯语版本的 SPS 显示出良好的心理测量特性和有效性,支持将其用于评估阿拉伯语使用者的睡眠困扰。这一适应不同文化背景的版本增强了睡眠评估能力,有助于提高阿拉伯语人群对失眠症的理解和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Resilience and hopelessness mediate the relationship between benevolent childhood experiences and life satisfaction: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Chinese translation and validation of the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI) for medical college students. The impact of co-occurring chronic pain and mental health symptoms on adolescent functioning, a cross-sectional survey. The hidden cost of abusive supervision: rudeness, sabotage, and ethics. The impact of noise-induced hearing loss on individual job performance: exploring the role of aggression and work-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1