Simon B Kramer, Frederike Raad, Alexander Hauser, Inger B Schipper, Niels W L Schep
{"title":"The Transverse Sigmoid Notch Morphology Unravelled.","authors":"Simon B Kramer, Frederike Raad, Alexander Hauser, Inger B Schipper, Niels W L Schep","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Several studies have described pathology in relation to transverse sigmoid notch morphology, using the Tolat transverse sigmoid notch classification. It is believed that the entire shape of a sigmoid notch can be described using Tolat sigmoid types. We hypothesised that the determination of the sigmoid notch shape (SNS) depends on the level of the transverse CT plane on the axial axis of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the transverse SNS on different axial CT levels in the same wrist. <b>Methods:</b> The transverse SNS of 53 participants were independently qualitatively classified by two researchers in accordance with the four morphologies described by Tolat et al. The SNS was determined at two levels on the axial axis of the distal radius; at the level of the most prominent part of Lister tubercle, determined on the sagittal plane and at the level of the 'smallest distance between the ulnar head and sigmoid notch' (SDUS). <b>Results:</b> Forty-seven percent of the wrists demonstrated different SNS types according to Tolat classification, depending on the axial level of the CT scan. Interobserver agreement on the transverse sigmoid shape was 87% at Lister tubercle and 85% at SDUS, which can both be interpreted as 'excellent'. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite an excellent interobserver agreement, 47% of the study population had different transverse sigmoid notch types within the same wrist. We, therefore, conclude that Tolat transverse sigmoid classification may not be useful for the description of potential pathology in relation to the sigmoid notch morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Several studies have described pathology in relation to transverse sigmoid notch morphology, using the Tolat transverse sigmoid notch classification. It is believed that the entire shape of a sigmoid notch can be described using Tolat sigmoid types. We hypothesised that the determination of the sigmoid notch shape (SNS) depends on the level of the transverse CT plane on the axial axis of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the transverse SNS on different axial CT levels in the same wrist. Methods: The transverse SNS of 53 participants were independently qualitatively classified by two researchers in accordance with the four morphologies described by Tolat et al. The SNS was determined at two levels on the axial axis of the distal radius; at the level of the most prominent part of Lister tubercle, determined on the sagittal plane and at the level of the 'smallest distance between the ulnar head and sigmoid notch' (SDUS). Results: Forty-seven percent of the wrists demonstrated different SNS types according to Tolat classification, depending on the axial level of the CT scan. Interobserver agreement on the transverse sigmoid shape was 87% at Lister tubercle and 85% at SDUS, which can both be interpreted as 'excellent'. Conclusions: Despite an excellent interobserver agreement, 47% of the study population had different transverse sigmoid notch types within the same wrist. We, therefore, conclude that Tolat transverse sigmoid classification may not be useful for the description of potential pathology in relation to the sigmoid notch morphology.