The effect of telemedicine employing telemonitoring instruments on readmissions of patients with heart failure and/or COPD: a systematic review.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1441334
Georgios M Stergiopoulos, Anissa N Elayadi, Edward S Chen, Panagis Galiatsatos
{"title":"The effect of telemedicine employing telemonitoring instruments on readmissions of patients with heart failure and/or COPD: a systematic review.","authors":"Georgios M Stergiopoulos, Anissa N Elayadi, Edward S Chen, Panagis Galiatsatos","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1441334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital readmissions pose a challenge for modern healthcare systems. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring of patients' vital signs in decreasing readmissions with a focus on a specific patient population particularly prone to rehospitalization: patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a comparative effectiveness systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest's ABI/INFORM, were searched for English-language articles published between 2012 and 2023. The studies included in the review employed telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring technologies and quantified the effect on hospital readmissions in the HF and/or COPD populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty scientific articles referencing twenty-nine clinical studies were identified (total of 4,326 patients) and were assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 (nine moderate risk, six serious risk) and ROBINS-I tools (two moderate risk, two serious risk), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (three good-quality, four fair-quality, two poor-quality). Regarding the primary outcome of our study which was readmissions: the readmission-related outcome most studied was all-cause readmissions followed by HF and acute exacerbation of COPD readmissions. Fourteen studies suggested that telemedicine using telemonitoring decreases the readmission-related burden, while most of the remaining studies suggested that it had a neutral effect on hospital readmissions. Examination of prospective studies focusing on all-cause readmission resulted in the observation of a clearer association in the reduction of all-cause readmissions in patients with COPD compared to patients with HF (100% vs. 8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review suggests that current telemedicine interventions employing telemonitoring instruments can decrease the readmission rates of patients with COPD, but most likely do not impact the readmission-related burden of the HF population. Implementation of novel telemonitoring technologies and conduct of more high-quality studies as well as studies of populations with ≥2 chronic disease are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This study is registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY), identifier (INPLASY202460097).</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1441334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital readmissions pose a challenge for modern healthcare systems. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring of patients' vital signs in decreasing readmissions with a focus on a specific patient population particularly prone to rehospitalization: patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a comparative effectiveness systematic review.

Methods: Three major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest's ABI/INFORM, were searched for English-language articles published between 2012 and 2023. The studies included in the review employed telemedicine incorporating telemonitoring technologies and quantified the effect on hospital readmissions in the HF and/or COPD populations.

Results: Thirty scientific articles referencing twenty-nine clinical studies were identified (total of 4,326 patients) and were assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 (nine moderate risk, six serious risk) and ROBINS-I tools (two moderate risk, two serious risk), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (three good-quality, four fair-quality, two poor-quality). Regarding the primary outcome of our study which was readmissions: the readmission-related outcome most studied was all-cause readmissions followed by HF and acute exacerbation of COPD readmissions. Fourteen studies suggested that telemedicine using telemonitoring decreases the readmission-related burden, while most of the remaining studies suggested that it had a neutral effect on hospital readmissions. Examination of prospective studies focusing on all-cause readmission resulted in the observation of a clearer association in the reduction of all-cause readmissions in patients with COPD compared to patients with HF (100% vs. 8%).

Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that current telemedicine interventions employing telemonitoring instruments can decrease the readmission rates of patients with COPD, but most likely do not impact the readmission-related burden of the HF population. Implementation of novel telemonitoring technologies and conduct of more high-quality studies as well as studies of populations with ≥2 chronic disease are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Systematic review registration: This study is registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY), identifier (INPLASY202460097).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用远程监控工具的远程医疗对心力衰竭和/或慢性阻塞性肺病患者再入院的影响:系统性综述。
背景:再入院是现代医疗系统面临的一项挑战。我们的目的是通过比较效果系统综述,评估远程医疗结合远程监测患者生命体征在减少再入院率方面的效果,重点是特别容易再入院的特定患者人群:心力衰竭(HF)和/或慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者:方法:在PubMed、Scopus和ProQuest's ABI/INFORM等三大电子数据库中检索了2012年至2023年间发表的英文文章。纳入综述的研究采用了远程医疗和远程监控技术,并量化了对高血压和/或慢性阻塞性肺病患者再住院率的影响:研究采用 RoB2(9 项中度风险,6 项严重风险)和 ROBINS-I 工具(2 项中度风险,2 项严重风险)以及纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(3 项质量良好,4 项质量一般,2 项质量较差)对偏倚风险进行了评估。我们研究的主要结果是再入院率:研究最多的再入院率相关结果是全因再入院率,其次是高血压和慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重再入院率。有 14 项研究表明,使用远程监控的远程医疗可降低再入院相关负担,而其余大多数研究则表明,远程医疗对再入院影响不大。对侧重于全因再入院的前瞻性研究进行审查后发现,与慢性阻塞性肺病患者相比,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的全因再入院率的降低有更明显的相关性(100% 对 8% ):本系统综述表明,目前采用远程监测仪器的远程医疗干预措施可以降低慢性阻塞性肺病患者的再入院率,但很可能不会对高血压患者的再入院相关负担产生影响。要想得出明确的结论,有必要采用新型远程监控技术、开展更多高质量的研究以及对≥2种慢性疾病的人群进行研究:本研究已在国际注册系统综述和荟萃分析协议平台(INPLASY)注册,标识符为(INPLASY202460097)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A use case of ChatGPT: summary of an expert panel discussion on electronic health records and implementation science. Remote monitoring and teleconsultations can reduce greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining quality of care in cystic fibrosis. Accessing medical care in the era of the digital revolution: arguing the case for the "digitally marginalised". Biofuser: a multi-source data fusion platform for fusing the data of fermentation process devices. Cost-effectiveness of digital interventions for mental health: current evidence, common misconceptions, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1