Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v11.41933
Sigfus Thor Eliasson, Jon Einar Dahl
{"title":"Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength.","authors":"Sigfus Thor Eliasson, Jon Einar Dahl","doi":"10.2340/biid.v11.41933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether acid etch contamination of silane-treated composite influenced repair bond strength and whether silane contamination on dentin influenced composite bond strength to dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty composite blocks stored in water for 4 weeks were divided into four groups. Specimens in groups 1-3 were coated with Bis-Silane and contaminated with acid etch + water spray (group 1) or water spray (group 2). Group 3 was not contaminated. Group 4 was untreated. The occlusal third of 60 third molars was cut off, ground flat, and divided into three groups. After etching, the surfaces in groups A and B were contaminated with Bis-silane. The contaminated surfaces in group A were re-etched.Each composite repair group and composite-dentin group was divided into two subgroups receiving Adper Scotchbond 1 XT or Clearfil SE Bond 2 adhesives followed by a composite build up. After ageing for 3 months, specimens were sectioned into 1.1 mm × 1.1 mm rods for tensile testing and strength calculated at fracture. The fracture was examined using microscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bis-Silane surface treatment increased the repair bond strength. Contamination with acid reduced the strength of the repair bond. Similar results were obtained for both adhesives. Tooth surface contamination with silane reduced the bond strength between dentin and composite. Additional acid etching or water spray on silane contaminated dentin did not influence the weakened bond strength. Most fractures were adhesive type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Silane contamination on etched dentin and acid etch contamination on silanized composite surfaces significantly reduced tensile bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"11 ","pages":"41933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v11.41933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether acid etch contamination of silane-treated composite influenced repair bond strength and whether silane contamination on dentin influenced composite bond strength to dentin.

Materials and methods: Forty composite blocks stored in water for 4 weeks were divided into four groups. Specimens in groups 1-3 were coated with Bis-Silane and contaminated with acid etch + water spray (group 1) or water spray (group 2). Group 3 was not contaminated. Group 4 was untreated. The occlusal third of 60 third molars was cut off, ground flat, and divided into three groups. After etching, the surfaces in groups A and B were contaminated with Bis-silane. The contaminated surfaces in group A were re-etched.Each composite repair group and composite-dentin group was divided into two subgroups receiving Adper Scotchbond 1 XT or Clearfil SE Bond 2 adhesives followed by a composite build up. After ageing for 3 months, specimens were sectioned into 1.1 mm × 1.1 mm rods for tensile testing and strength calculated at fracture. The fracture was examined using microscope.

Results: Bis-Silane surface treatment increased the repair bond strength. Contamination with acid reduced the strength of the repair bond. Similar results were obtained for both adhesives. Tooth surface contamination with silane reduced the bond strength between dentin and composite. Additional acid etching or water spray on silane contaminated dentin did not influence the weakened bond strength. Most fractures were adhesive type.

Conclusions: Silane contamination on etched dentin and acid etch contamination on silanized composite surfaces significantly reduced tensile bond strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙本质和复合材料的硅烷和酸蚀交叉污染降低了µ-拉伸粘接强度。
目的研究硅烷处理过的复合材料的酸蚀污染是否会影响修复粘接强度,以及牙本质上的硅烷污染是否会影响复合材料与牙本质的粘接强度:将 40 个在水中保存 4 周的复合材料块分为 4 组。第 1-3 组的试样涂有双硅烷,并受到酸蚀+喷水(第 1 组)或喷水(第 2 组)的污染。第 3 组未受污染。第 4 组未经处理。将 60 颗第三磨牙的咬合三分之一切下,磨平,分成三组。蚀刻后,A 组和 B 组的表面被双硅烷污染。每个复合材料修复组和复合材料-牙本质组又分为两个小组,分别接受 Adper Scotchbond 1 XT 或 Clearfil SE Bond 2 粘接剂的粘接,然后再进行复合材料修复。老化 3 个月后,将试样切成 1.1 毫米 × 1.1 毫米的棒状,进行拉伸测试并计算断裂时的强度。用显微镜检查断裂情况:结果:双硅烷表面处理提高了修复粘接强度。酸污染降低了修复粘接强度。两种粘合剂的结果相似。牙齿表面的硅烷污染降低了牙本质和复合材料之间的粘接强度。对受硅烷污染的牙本质进行额外的酸蚀刻或喷水并不会影响已减弱的粘接强度。大多数断裂都是粘接类型的:蚀刻牙本质上的硅烷污染和硅烷化复合材料表面的酸蚀污染会显著降低拉伸粘接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects. Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength. Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1