Comparison of Diffusion-weighted MRI using Singe-Shot Echo-planar Imaging (SS-EPI) and Split Acquisition of Fast Spin Echo Signal (SPLICE) Imaging, a non-EPI technique, in Tumors of the Head and Neck.

Hedda J van der Hulst, Loes Braun, Bram Westerink, Georgios Agrotis, Leon C Ter Beek, Renaud Tissier, Milad Ahmadian, Roland M Martens, Jan W Casselman, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Michiel W M van den Brekel, Jonas A Castelijns
{"title":"Comparison of Diffusion-weighted MRI using Singe-Shot Echo-planar Imaging (SS-EPI) and Split Acquisition of Fast Spin Echo Signal (SPLICE) Imaging, a non-EPI technique, in Tumors of the Head and Neck.","authors":"Hedda J van der Hulst, Loes Braun, Bram Westerink, Georgios Agrotis, Leon C Ter Beek, Renaud Tissier, Milad Ahmadian, Roland M Martens, Jan W Casselman, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Michiel W M van den Brekel, Jonas A Castelijns","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using single-shot echo planar imaging (DW-EPI) is susceptible to distortions around air-filled cavities and dental fillings, typical for the head and neck area. Non-EPI, Split acquisition of fast spin echo signals for diffusion imaging (DWSPLICE) could reduce these distortions and enhance image quality, thereby potentially improving recurrence assessment in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck region. This study evaluated whether DW-SPLICE is a viable alternative to DW-EPI through quantitative and qualitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The DW-SPLICE sequence was incorporated into the standard 3.0T head and neck MRI protocol with DW-EPI. Retrospective analysis was conducted on two subgroups: firstly benign or malignant lesions, and secondly post-treatment SCC recurrence. In both subgroups Image quality and distortion were scored by two independent radiologists, blinded for DW-technique, and evaluated using mixed-effect linear models. Lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were assessed with inter-class correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. DWI's delineation geometric similarity to T1-weighted post-contrast (T1Wc) MRI was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) before and after registration. Recurrence in post-treatment SCC scans was evaluated by the same two radiologists blinded for DW-technique. Recurrence detection rates were then compared between DW-SPLICE and DW-EPI using mixed logistic regression at six months and at one-year post-scan follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2020 to January 2022, 55 benign or malignant lesion scans (55 patients) and 74 post-treatment SCC scans (66 patients) were analyzed. DW-SPLICE scored better on image quality and showed less overall distortion than DW-EPI (0.04<p<0.001). There was high ADC measurement reliability (ICC=0.93, p<0.001), though a proportional bias was also observed (β=0.11, p=0.03), indicating the bias increases as ADC values rise. DWSPLICE exhibited greater geometric similarity to T1Wc before registration (DSC 0.63 vs 0.47, p<0.001) and outperformed DW-EPI by more accurately identifying recurrences after one year (OR=0.96, p=0.05) but not after six months (OR=0.72, p=0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DW-SPLICE surpasses DW-EPI on image distortion and quality and improves diagnostic reliability for detecting recurrent or residual SCC on 3T MRI of the HN. Consistent use of one method for follow-up is advised, as ADC values are not completely interchangeable. Integrating DW-SPLICE can significantly improve tumor assessments in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>ANTs = Advanced Normalization Tools; DSC = Dice Similarity Coefficient; DW-EPI = Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo planar imaging; DW-MS-EPI = Diffusion-weighted multi-shot echo planar imaging; DW-SPLICE = Diffusion-weighted split acquisition of fast spin echo signals for diffusion imaging; DW-TSE = Diffusion-weighted Turbo Spin Echo; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; ROC = Receiver Operating Characteristic; SCC = Squamous cell carcinoma; T1WIc = T1 weighted imaging with gadolinium contrast.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using single-shot echo planar imaging (DW-EPI) is susceptible to distortions around air-filled cavities and dental fillings, typical for the head and neck area. Non-EPI, Split acquisition of fast spin echo signals for diffusion imaging (DWSPLICE) could reduce these distortions and enhance image quality, thereby potentially improving recurrence assessment in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck region. This study evaluated whether DW-SPLICE is a viable alternative to DW-EPI through quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Materials and methods: The DW-SPLICE sequence was incorporated into the standard 3.0T head and neck MRI protocol with DW-EPI. Retrospective analysis was conducted on two subgroups: firstly benign or malignant lesions, and secondly post-treatment SCC recurrence. In both subgroups Image quality and distortion were scored by two independent radiologists, blinded for DW-technique, and evaluated using mixed-effect linear models. Lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were assessed with inter-class correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. DWI's delineation geometric similarity to T1-weighted post-contrast (T1Wc) MRI was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) before and after registration. Recurrence in post-treatment SCC scans was evaluated by the same two radiologists blinded for DW-technique. Recurrence detection rates were then compared between DW-SPLICE and DW-EPI using mixed logistic regression at six months and at one-year post-scan follow-up data.

Results: From August 2020 to January 2022, 55 benign or malignant lesion scans (55 patients) and 74 post-treatment SCC scans (66 patients) were analyzed. DW-SPLICE scored better on image quality and showed less overall distortion than DW-EPI (0.04

Conclusions: DW-SPLICE surpasses DW-EPI on image distortion and quality and improves diagnostic reliability for detecting recurrent or residual SCC on 3T MRI of the HN. Consistent use of one method for follow-up is advised, as ADC values are not completely interchangeable. Integrating DW-SPLICE can significantly improve tumor assessments in clinical practice.

Abbreviations: ANTs = Advanced Normalization Tools; DSC = Dice Similarity Coefficient; DW-EPI = Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo planar imaging; DW-MS-EPI = Diffusion-weighted multi-shot echo planar imaging; DW-SPLICE = Diffusion-weighted split acquisition of fast spin echo signals for diffusion imaging; DW-TSE = Diffusion-weighted Turbo Spin Echo; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; ROC = Receiver Operating Characteristic; SCC = Squamous cell carcinoma; T1WIc = T1 weighted imaging with gadolinium contrast.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头颈部肿瘤弥散加权磁共振成像(Diffusion-weighted MRI)与单射回声平面成像(SS-EPI)和快速自旋回波信号分割采集成像(SPLICE)(一种非 EPI 技术)的比较。
背景和目的:使用单次回波平面成像(DW-EPI)的弥散加权成像(DWI)容易在充满空气的空腔和牙科填充物周围出现失真,而这在头颈部地区非常典型。非EPI、快速自旋回波信号扩散成像(DWSPLICE)的分割采集可减少这些失真并提高图像质量,从而有可能改善头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的复发评估。本研究通过定量和定性分析评估了 DW-SPLICE 是否是 DW-EPI 的可行替代方案:将 DW-SPLICE 序列纳入标准 3.0T 头颈部 MRI DW-EPI 方案中。对两个亚组进行了回顾性分析:首先是良性或恶性病变,其次是治疗后 SCC 复发。在这两个亚组中,图像质量和失真均由两名独立的放射科医生进行评分,他们对 DW 技术都是盲人,并使用混合效应线性模型进行评估。病变表观弥散系数(ADC)值通过类间相关性(ICC)和布兰-阿尔特曼分析进行评估。使用戴斯相似性系数(DSC)评估登记前后 DWI 与 T1 加权后对比(T1Wc)MRI 的几何相似性。治疗后 SCC 扫描中的复发情况由同样的两名放射科医生进行评估,他们对 DW 技术进行了盲测。然后使用混合逻辑回归法比较DW-SPLICE和DW-EPI在六个月和一年扫描后随访数据中的复发检测率:结果:从 2020 年 8 月到 2022 年 1 月,共分析了 55 例良性或恶性病变扫描(55 例患者)和 74 例治疗后 SCC 扫描(66 例患者)。与 DW-EPI 相比,DW-SPLICE 的图像质量得分更高,总体失真更少(0.04):DW-SPLICE在图像失真和质量方面均优于DW-EPI,提高了在HN的3T MRI上检测复发或残留SCC的诊断可靠性。由于 ADC 值不能完全互换,建议在随访时始终使用一种方法。整合 DW-SPLICE 可以显著改善临床实践中的肿瘤评估:缩写:ANTs = 高级归一化工具;DSC = Dice相似系数;DW-EPI = 扩散加权单发回波平面成像;DW-MS-EPI = 扩散加权多发回波平面成像;DW-SPLICE = 扩散加权快速自旋回波信号分割采集扩散成像;DW-TSE=扩散加权涡轮自旋回波;ICC=类内相关系数;ROC=接收者操作特征;SCC=鳞状细胞癌;T1WIc=T1加权钆对比成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pretreatment Perfusion Imaging Parameters With 90-Day Excellent Functional Outcomes in Anterior Circulation Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke. Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic quantification of nigrosome-1 and Parkinsonism classification using susceptibility map-weighted MRI. High wall shear stress is related to complicated AHA lesion type VI plaques in mild to moderate internal carotid artery stenosis - a 3D cardiovascular MRI study. Prevalence of Spinal Meningeal Diverticula in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1