Suffering in children and adolescents in paediatric palliative care in Spain: psychometric properties of the qESNA scale

Daniel Toro-Pérez , Joaquin T. Limonero , Catalina Bolancé , Montserrat Guillen , Sergi Navarro-Vilarrubí , Ester Camprodon-Rosanas
{"title":"Suffering in children and adolescents in paediatric palliative care in Spain: psychometric properties of the qESNA scale","authors":"Daniel Toro-Pérez ,&nbsp;Joaquin T. Limonero ,&nbsp;Catalina Bolancé ,&nbsp;Montserrat Guillen ,&nbsp;Sergi Navarro-Vilarrubí ,&nbsp;Ester Camprodon-Rosanas","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the psychometric properties of the qESNA scale and its usefulness to assess the suffering of paediatric patients with life-limiting and/or life-threatening diseases (children with LLTC) in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional and longitudinal study in 58 patients in Spain (female, 32.8%; mean age, 15.6 [SD, 4.5]; age range, 8–23 years), with administration of the qESNA scale along with other scales to assess anxiety, depression, emotion regulation and psychosocial functioning. We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and calculated goodness-of-fit indices were calculated; we assessed reliability by means of the Cronbach alpha and temporal stability and convergent validity through the intraclass correlation coefficient with scales used to assess psychological disorders and the specificity and sensitivity through ROC curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The factor analysis identified a 14-item scale with 3 factors, a comparative fit index of 0.93, a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.91 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.07. The Cronbach alpha was 0.85 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66. The convergent validity was high for the correlation to the risk of depression (−0.69) and of anxiety (−0.60) and emotional changes (−0.59). The analysis of the ROC curves showed that a score of less than 81 would be indicative of suffering, with a sensitivity of 83.33% and a specificity of 93.48%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study confirmed that the psychometric properties of the qESNA scale are good and the scale’s usefulness as an instrument to detect emotional suffering in children with life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"101 4","pages":"Pages 238-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287924002308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the psychometric properties of the qESNA scale and its usefulness to assess the suffering of paediatric patients with life-limiting and/or life-threatening diseases (children with LLTC) in clinical practice.

Methods

Cross-sectional and longitudinal study in 58 patients in Spain (female, 32.8%; mean age, 15.6 [SD, 4.5]; age range, 8–23 years), with administration of the qESNA scale along with other scales to assess anxiety, depression, emotion regulation and psychosocial functioning. We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and calculated goodness-of-fit indices were calculated; we assessed reliability by means of the Cronbach alpha and temporal stability and convergent validity through the intraclass correlation coefficient with scales used to assess psychological disorders and the specificity and sensitivity through ROC curves.

Results

The factor analysis identified a 14-item scale with 3 factors, a comparative fit index of 0.93, a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.91 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.07. The Cronbach alpha was 0.85 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66. The convergent validity was high for the correlation to the risk of depression (−0.69) and of anxiety (−0.60) and emotional changes (−0.59). The analysis of the ROC curves showed that a score of less than 81 would be indicative of suffering, with a sensitivity of 83.33% and a specificity of 93.48%.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the psychometric properties of the qESNA scale are good and the scale’s usefulness as an instrument to detect emotional suffering in children with life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙儿科姑息治疗中儿童和青少年的痛苦:qESNA量表的心理测量特性。
目的分析qESNA量表的心理测量特性及其在临床实践中用于评估患有局限性疾病和/或危及生命的疾病的儿科患者(LLTC患儿)的痛苦的实用性:对西班牙的 58 名患者(女性,32.8%;平均年龄 15.6 [SD, 4.5];年龄范围 8-23 岁)进行横断面和纵向研究,同时使用 qESNA 量表和其他量表评估焦虑、抑郁、情绪调节和社会心理功能。我们进行了探索性和确认性因素分析,并计算了拟合优度指数;我们通过克朗巴赫α评估了信度,通过类内相关系数评估了时间稳定性和收敛效度,并通过ROC曲线评估了特异性和敏感性:因子分析确定了一个包含 3 个因子的 14 项量表,比较拟合指数为 0.93,塔克-刘易斯指数为 0.91,均方根近似误差为 0.07。Cronbach alpha 为 0.85,类内相关系数为 0.66。与抑郁风险(-0.69)、焦虑(-0.60)和情绪变化(-0.59)的相关性较高。ROC 曲线分析表明,得分低于 81 分将表明患有抑郁症,其敏感性为 83.33%,特异性为 93.48%:本研究证实了 qESNA 量表具有良好的心理测量学特性,可作为临床实践中检测患有局限性疾病或危及生命疾病的儿童情绪痛苦的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neutrophil CD64 expression increases in infants aged less than 3 months with fever without source: pilot study in the paediatric emergency care setting. Physical, social, and emotional impact on patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. If triage works, the ED works. Oral blistering mucositis in adolescent. Metabolopathy with characteristic clinical triad: Sengers syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1