Reconstruction trends in New York City: A multi-decade, multi-institutional experience before and after the implementation of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law
Yunchan Chen , Chase Alston , Paul Asadourian , Grant G. Black , Christine H. Rohde , David M. Otterburn
{"title":"Reconstruction trends in New York City: A multi-decade, multi-institutional experience before and after the implementation of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law","authors":"Yunchan Chen , Chase Alston , Paul Asadourian , Grant G. Black , Christine H. Rohde , David M. Otterburn","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The potential benefits of breast reconstruction for achieving greater patient satisfaction, wellbeing, and functional outcomes after mastectomy have been widely acknowledged. However, sociodemographic and economic disparities exist in accessing reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize the influence of various factors on access to reconstruction and investigate the impact of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law (BCPDL), legislation that mandates patient education and referral to plastic surgery at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, on utilization of reconstructive services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on patients who underwent mastectomy at two institutions within the New York-Presbyterian system from 1998–2019. Sociodemographic, past medical history, and treatment approach information were recorded. Interrupted time series analysis and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort included 6122 patients, of which 3737 (61.04%) underwent reconstruction and 2385 (38.96%) did not. Older age, Medicaid/Medicare insurance, higher tumor staging, and Asian American/Pacific Islander identity were negative predictors of undergoing reconstruction. The interrupted time series analysis of the years before and the years after implementation of the 2010 BCPDL revealed that while there was an immediate increase in the proportion of patients who received reconstruction, the effects were not sustained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data indicates that patient-physician communication alone may not be sufficient to bridge the gap in reconstructive care. This study highlights the need for consistent plastic surgery referral for sustained equal access to reconstructive services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The potential benefits of breast reconstruction for achieving greater patient satisfaction, wellbeing, and functional outcomes after mastectomy have been widely acknowledged. However, sociodemographic and economic disparities exist in accessing reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize the influence of various factors on access to reconstruction and investigate the impact of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law (BCPDL), legislation that mandates patient education and referral to plastic surgery at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, on utilization of reconstructive services.
Methods
Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on patients who underwent mastectomy at two institutions within the New York-Presbyterian system from 1998–2019. Sociodemographic, past medical history, and treatment approach information were recorded. Interrupted time series analysis and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The cohort included 6122 patients, of which 3737 (61.04%) underwent reconstruction and 2385 (38.96%) did not. Older age, Medicaid/Medicare insurance, higher tumor staging, and Asian American/Pacific Islander identity were negative predictors of undergoing reconstruction. The interrupted time series analysis of the years before and the years after implementation of the 2010 BCPDL revealed that while there was an immediate increase in the proportion of patients who received reconstruction, the effects were not sustained.
Conclusion
Our data indicates that patient-physician communication alone may not be sufficient to bridge the gap in reconstructive care. This study highlights the need for consistent plastic surgery referral for sustained equal access to reconstructive services.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.