Reconstruction trends in New York City: A multi-decade, multi-institutional experience before and after the implementation of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law

Yunchan Chen , Chase Alston , Paul Asadourian , Grant G. Black , Christine H. Rohde , David M. Otterburn
{"title":"Reconstruction trends in New York City: A multi-decade, multi-institutional experience before and after the implementation of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law","authors":"Yunchan Chen ,&nbsp;Chase Alston ,&nbsp;Paul Asadourian ,&nbsp;Grant G. Black ,&nbsp;Christine H. Rohde ,&nbsp;David M. Otterburn","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The potential benefits of breast reconstruction for achieving greater patient satisfaction, wellbeing, and functional outcomes after mastectomy have been widely acknowledged. However, sociodemographic and economic disparities exist in accessing reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize the influence of various factors on access to reconstruction and investigate the impact of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law (BCPDL), legislation that mandates patient education and referral to plastic surgery at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, on utilization of reconstructive services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on patients who underwent mastectomy at two institutions within the New York-Presbyterian system from 1998–2019. Sociodemographic, past medical history, and treatment approach information were recorded. Interrupted time series analysis and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort included 6122 patients, of which 3737 (61.04%) underwent reconstruction and 2385 (38.96%) did not. Older age, Medicaid/Medicare insurance, higher tumor staging, and Asian American/Pacific Islander identity were negative predictors of undergoing reconstruction. The interrupted time series analysis of the years before and the years after implementation of the 2010 BCPDL revealed that while there was an immediate increase in the proportion of patients who received reconstruction, the effects were not sustained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data indicates that patient-physician communication alone may not be sufficient to bridge the gap in reconstructive care. This study highlights the need for consistent plastic surgery referral for sustained equal access to reconstructive services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The potential benefits of breast reconstruction for achieving greater patient satisfaction, wellbeing, and functional outcomes after mastectomy have been widely acknowledged. However, sociodemographic and economic disparities exist in accessing reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize the influence of various factors on access to reconstruction and investigate the impact of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law (BCPDL), legislation that mandates patient education and referral to plastic surgery at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, on utilization of reconstructive services.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on patients who underwent mastectomy at two institutions within the New York-Presbyterian system from 1998–2019. Sociodemographic, past medical history, and treatment approach information were recorded. Interrupted time series analysis and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The cohort included 6122 patients, of which 3737 (61.04%) underwent reconstruction and 2385 (38.96%) did not. Older age, Medicaid/Medicare insurance, higher tumor staging, and Asian American/Pacific Islander identity were negative predictors of undergoing reconstruction. The interrupted time series analysis of the years before and the years after implementation of the 2010 BCPDL revealed that while there was an immediate increase in the proportion of patients who received reconstruction, the effects were not sustained.

Conclusion

Our data indicates that patient-physician communication alone may not be sufficient to bridge the gap in reconstructive care. This study highlights the need for consistent plastic surgery referral for sustained equal access to reconstructive services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约市的重建趋势:乳腺癌提供者讨论法》实施前后几十年的多机构经验。
导言:乳房切除术后,乳房再造对提高患者满意度、幸福感和功能效果的潜在益处已得到广泛认可。然而,在获得乳房再造方面存在着社会人口和经济差异。本研究旨在描述各种因素对获得乳房再造服务的影响,并调查《乳腺癌提供者讨论法》(BCPDL)对乳房再造服务利用率的影响:方法:对病历进行回顾性审查,收集 1998-2019 年间在纽约长老会系统内两家机构接受乳房切除术的患者数据。记录了社会人口学、既往病史和治疗方法等信息。采用间断时间序列分析和逻辑回归进行统计分析:队列包括 6122 名患者,其中 3737 人(61.04%)接受了重建,2385 人(38.96%)未接受重建。年龄较大、医疗补助/医疗保险、肿瘤分期较高以及亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民身份是接受重建手术的负面预测因素。对2010 BCPDL实施前几年和实施后几年的间断时间序列分析表明,虽然接受重建的患者比例立即增加,但效果并不持久:我们的数据表明,仅靠医患沟通可能不足以弥补重建护理方面的差距。这项研究强调了整形外科转诊的一致性,以便持续提供平等的整形服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
SCIV-only versus VCs-only conduit: Which is optimal for multipaddle and chimeric SCIAP flaps? Clinicopathologic features and surgical management in vulvovaginal melanoma – A retrospective single-center study Rib-sparing subclavian vein decompression in venous thoracic outlet syndrome Editorial Board The impact of cosmetic tourism across one year on an NHS breast surgery unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1