Statin use trajectories postbariatric surgery: a matched cohort analysis.

Anyull D Bohorquez Caballero, Elizabeth Wall-Wieler, Yuki Liu, Feibi Zheng, Michael A Edwards
{"title":"Statin use trajectories postbariatric surgery: a matched cohort analysis.","authors":"Anyull D Bohorquez Caballero, Elizabeth Wall-Wieler, Yuki Liu, Feibi Zheng, Michael A Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most durable treatment of obesity and can reduce statin use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compare statin use trajectories in patients with and without MBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with a body mass index ≥ 35kg/m<sup>2</sup> were identified using a U.S. employer-based retrospective claims database. Individuals who had MBS were matched 1:1 with those who did not. Trajectories of statin use were stratified by statin use in the year before the index date and examined in the 2 years after the index date.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen thousand three hundred fifty-nine adults who had MBS and 16,359 matched adults who did not were analyzed. In both groups, 19.4% filled a statin prescription in the year before the index date. In the 2 years after the index date, individuals using statins remained similar at 20% (year 1) and 19% (year 2) among those who didn't have an MBS and decreased to 12.5% (year 1) and 9.3% (year 2) in the MBS cohort. Among baseline statin users, 35.4% of non-MBS and 60.4% of the MBS cohort stopped using statins within 2 years of the index date. Among statin naïve individuals at baseline, 9.6% of the non-MBS cohort started using statins within 2 years of the index date, compared to 2.6% of those who had MBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBS results in a significant discontinuation of statins among baseline users, and significantly decreased the initiation of medications among individuals who were statin naive at baseline. This demonstrates that MBS is both a treatment and preventative measure for dyslipidemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most durable treatment of obesity and can reduce statin use.

Objective: We compare statin use trajectories in patients with and without MBS.

Methods: Adults with a body mass index ≥ 35kg/m2 were identified using a U.S. employer-based retrospective claims database. Individuals who had MBS were matched 1:1 with those who did not. Trajectories of statin use were stratified by statin use in the year before the index date and examined in the 2 years after the index date.

Setting: University Hospital.

Results: Sixteen thousand three hundred fifty-nine adults who had MBS and 16,359 matched adults who did not were analyzed. In both groups, 19.4% filled a statin prescription in the year before the index date. In the 2 years after the index date, individuals using statins remained similar at 20% (year 1) and 19% (year 2) among those who didn't have an MBS and decreased to 12.5% (year 1) and 9.3% (year 2) in the MBS cohort. Among baseline statin users, 35.4% of non-MBS and 60.4% of the MBS cohort stopped using statins within 2 years of the index date. Among statin naïve individuals at baseline, 9.6% of the non-MBS cohort started using statins within 2 years of the index date, compared to 2.6% of those who had MBS.

Conclusions: MBS results in a significant discontinuation of statins among baseline users, and significantly decreased the initiation of medications among individuals who were statin naive at baseline. This demonstrates that MBS is both a treatment and preventative measure for dyslipidemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减肥手术后他汀类药物的使用轨迹:匹配队列分析。
背景:代谢和减肥手术(MBS)是肥胖症最持久的治疗方法,可减少他汀类药物的使用:我们比较了接受和未接受代谢与减肥手术的患者使用他汀类药物的轨迹:方法: 我们通过基于美国雇主的回顾性索赔数据库确定了体重指数≥ 35kg/m2 的成年人。患有 MBS 的患者与未患有 MBS 的患者进行 1:1 匹配。根据指数日期前一年他汀类药物的使用情况对他汀类药物的使用轨迹进行分层,并对指数日期后两年的他汀类药物使用情况进行检查:地点:大学医院:分析了 16,359 名患有 MBS 的成年人和 16,359 名未患有 MBS 的匹配成年人。两组中均有 19.4% 的人在指数日期前一年开过他汀类药物处方。在指数日期后的两年中,没有进行 MBS 的人群中使用他汀类药物的比例仍然相似,分别为 20%(第一年)和 19%(第二年),而在 MBS 群体中,使用他汀类药物的比例则分别降至 12.5%(第一年)和 9.3%(第二年)。在基线他汀类药物使用者中,35.4% 的非 MBS 和 60.4% 的 MBS 群体在指数日期后的 2 年内停止使用他汀类药物。在基线他汀类药物新使用者中,9.6%的非MBS队列在指数日期后2年内开始使用他汀类药物,而在MBS队列中,这一比例仅为2.6%:结论:他汀类药物基线使用者停用他汀类药物的情况非常明显,而他汀类药物基线使用者开始使用他汀类药物的情况则明显减少。这表明,MBS 既能治疗血脂异常,又能预防血脂异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comment on: endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies and its effect on MASLD: a review of the current literature. Comment on: The safety profile of one-anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program analysis. Letter to the editor regarding "Racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: an 8-year analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program data". Comment on: Patients' experience with preoperative use of anti-obesity medications and associations with bariatric surgery expectations. The trend of atherogenic indices in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: a national cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1