Glycemic Management in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of Glycemic Control and Drug Therapy.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3553
Emily Blacklaws, Kieran Shah, Sarah N Stabler
{"title":"Glycemic Management in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of Glycemic Control and Drug Therapy.","authors":"Emily Blacklaws, Kieran Shah, Sarah N Stabler","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence describes the high incidence and strong impact of hyperglycemia on the outcomes of critically ill patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Given resource limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians moved away from using continuous IV infusions of insulin to manage hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate glycemic control in critically ill patients receiving various medication regimens to manage their hyperglycemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved 120 mechanically ventilated adult patients (> 18 years) with COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2020 and December 2021. The following data were collected for the first 14 days of the ICU admission: blood glucose values (up to 4 times daily), hypoglycemia events, and antihyperglycemic medication regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of IV insulin infusions maintained glucose measurements within the target range of 4 to 10 mmol/L more often than any other medication regimen, with 60% of measured values falling within the target range. The use of a sliding-scale insulin regimen maintained 52% of glucose measurements within the target range. Oral hypoglycemic agents performed relatively poorly, with only 12% to 29% of glucose measurements within range. The coadministration of corticosteroids led to worse glycemic control across all medication regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that ICUs should continue using the standard protocol of IV insulin infusion to achieve recommended blood glucose targets in critically ill patients with COVID-19, particularly those receiving corticosteroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"77 4","pages":"e3553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence describes the high incidence and strong impact of hyperglycemia on the outcomes of critically ill patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Given resource limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians moved away from using continuous IV infusions of insulin to manage hyperglycemia.

Objective: To evaluate glycemic control in critically ill patients receiving various medication regimens to manage their hyperglycemia.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 120 mechanically ventilated adult patients (> 18 years) with COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2020 and December 2021. The following data were collected for the first 14 days of the ICU admission: blood glucose values (up to 4 times daily), hypoglycemia events, and antihyperglycemic medication regimens.

Results: The use of IV insulin infusions maintained glucose measurements within the target range of 4 to 10 mmol/L more often than any other medication regimen, with 60% of measured values falling within the target range. The use of a sliding-scale insulin regimen maintained 52% of glucose measurements within the target range. Oral hypoglycemic agents performed relatively poorly, with only 12% to 29% of glucose measurements within range. The coadministration of corticosteroids led to worse glycemic control across all medication regimens.

Conclusions: This study confirmed that ICUs should continue using the standard protocol of IV insulin infusion to achieve recommended blood glucose targets in critically ill patients with COVID-19, particularly those receiving corticosteroids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入住重症监护病房的 COVID-19 患者的血糖管理:评估血糖控制和药物治疗。
背景:新的证据表明,高血糖的发生率很高,而且对诊断为 COVID-19 的重症患者的预后影响很大。鉴于 COVID-19 大流行期间的资源限制,临床医生不再使用持续静脉注射胰岛素来控制高血糖:评估接受不同药物治疗方案的重症患者的血糖控制情况:这项回顾性队列研究涉及2020年2月至2021年12月期间入住重症监护室(ICU)的120名患有COVID-19的机械通气成人患者(大于18岁)。研究收集了患者入住重症监护室前 14 天的以下数据:血糖值(每天最多 4 次)、低血糖事件和降糖药物治疗方案:结果:使用静脉注射胰岛素比使用其他药物更能使血糖测量值保持在 4 至 10 mmol/L 的目标范围内,60% 的测量值都在目标范围内。使用滑动胰岛素疗法可使 52% 的血糖测量值保持在目标范围内。口服降糖药的效果相对较差,只有 12% 至 29% 的血糖测量值在目标范围内。在所有用药方案中,联合使用皮质类固醇会导致血糖控制更差:本研究证实,重症监护病房应继续使用静脉输注胰岛素的标准方案,以实现 COVID-19 重症患者,尤其是接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者的血糖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Definitive Cefazolin Therapy for Community-Acquired Enterobacterales Bacteremias across Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Breakpoints. Processus de préparation des cytotoxiques injectables : gestion des risques par l’application de la méthode d’analyse des modes de défaillance, de leurs effets et de leur criticité. Survey of Guidance for Authors on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Journals. Successful Desensitization in a Patient Receiving Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for ERBB2-Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer: Case Report. Impact of Pharmacist Interventions and Interprofessional Agreement in Critical Care: Analysis Using the Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1