首页 > 最新文献

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy最新文献

英文 中文
Processus de préparation des cytotoxiques injectables : gestion des risques par l’application de la méthode d’analyse des modes de défaillance, de leurs effets et de leur criticité. 注射细胞毒性制剂的制备过程:通过应用失效模式、影响和临界性分析方法进行风险管理。
Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3851
Wiem Ben Ayed, Azza Ben Haddada, Azza Ben Said, Imen Toukabri, Imen Limayem

Background: The preparation of injectable chemotherapy drugs is a critical process, given their toxicity and the large number of stakeholders involved. As such, systematic and proactive risk assessment is required.

Objective: To analyze the risks associated with the cytotoxic drug preparation process using the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) method within a centralized cytotoxic drug preparation unit (CCDPU).

Methods: An analytical study was conducted in a CCDPU over a 6-month period. The risk analysis was performed using the FMECA method. An action plan was developed to address critical scenarios. A second FMECA cycle was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented actions.

Results: A total of 189 failure modes were identified, of which 2% were deemed unacceptable and 30% were tolerable when controlled. An action plan was developed based on training, double visual inspection, and the implementation of analytical control. During the follow-up FMECA, a reduction of 23% in the overall criticality index was observed, with a significant improvement in criticality levels. Of the 60 actions, 73% were completed, and an updated action plan was proposed.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate the CCDPU team's genuine commitment to risk management and the usefulness of the FMECA method in a continuous improvement approach to the cytotoxic preparation circuit.

背景:注射化疗药物的制备是一个关键的过程,因为它们的毒性和大量的利益相关者参与。因此,需要进行系统和主动的风险评估。目的:应用失效模式、效应及临界性分析(FMECA)方法分析某细胞毒药物集中式制备单元(CCDPU)细胞毒药物制备过程的相关风险。方法:在CCDPU中进行为期6个月的分析研究。采用FMECA方法进行风险分析。制定了一项行动计划,以应对关键情况。进行了第二个FMECA周期,以评估所实施行动的有效性。结果:共识别出189种失效模式,其中2%为不可接受的,30%为可容忍的。在培训、双重目视检查和实施分析控制的基础上制定了一项行动计划。在后续FMECA期间,观察到总体临界指数降低了23%,临界水平显着提高。60项行动中,73%已完成,并提出了更新的行动计划。结论:这些结果证明了CCDPU团队对风险管理的真正承诺,以及FMECA方法在持续改进细胞毒制备回路中的有效性。
{"title":"Processus de préparation des cytotoxiques injectables : gestion des risques par l’application de la méthode d’analyse des modes de défaillance, de leurs effets et de leur criticité.","authors":"Wiem Ben Ayed, Azza Ben Haddada, Azza Ben Said, Imen Toukabri, Imen Limayem","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3851","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The preparation of injectable chemotherapy drugs is a critical process, given their toxicity and the large number of stakeholders involved. As such, systematic and proactive risk assessment is required.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risks associated with the cytotoxic drug preparation process using the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) method within a centralized cytotoxic drug preparation unit (CCDPU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted in a CCDPU over a 6-month period. The risk analysis was performed using the FMECA method. An action plan was developed to address critical scenarios. A second FMECA cycle was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 failure modes were identified, of which 2% were deemed unacceptable and 30% were tolerable when controlled. An action plan was developed based on training, double visual inspection, and the implementation of analytical control. During the follow-up FMECA, a reduction of 23% in the overall criticality index was observed, with a significant improvement in criticality levels. Of the 60 actions, 73% were completed, and an updated action plan was proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate the CCDPU team's genuine commitment to risk management and the usefulness of the FMECA method in a continuous improvement approach to the cytotoxic preparation circuit.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3851"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survey of Guidance for Authors on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Journals. 医药期刊作者使用生成式人工智能指南调查
Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3858
Juliette Mutin, Jean-François Bussières

Background: Since November 2022, conversational tools powered by generative artificial intelligence (GAI) have become integrated into academic and professional practice within the health care field.

Objectives: To identify and quantify the prevalence of recommendations to authors regarding the use of GAI as issued by pharmaceutical journals, their publishers, and certain associations of peer-reviewed medical journals.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the recommendations regarding GAI use issued by 3 medical journal associations (the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and the World Association of Medical Editors), 8 journal publishers (Springer, Taylor & Francis, Elsevier, Wiley, Sage, Oxford Academic, BMJ, and Springer Nature), and 22 pharmaceutical journals. The presence or absence of specific recommendations was coded.

Results: The analysis led to synthesis of 16 recommendations concerning use of GAI in scientific publishing, which were classified into 3 categories: reporting and transparency, authorship and accountability, and restrictions on use. The recommendations most often emphasized disclosure of GAI use in manuscripts and the prohibition of GAI as an author. Overall, 14 of the 22 pharmaceutical journals included one or more of the 16 recommendations. Among these 14 journals, the average proportion of included recommendations was 39% (standard deviation [SD] 12%). When recommendations suggested by publishers and journal associations were included in the analysis, as applicable, this proportion increased to 51% (SD 28%).

Conclusions: Recommendations provided to authors about the use of GAI were highly variable. As such, this study highlights a lack of consensus on the integration of GAI within pharmaceutical journals, with many current guidelines being insufficient or outdated. The development of standardized and up-to-date guidelines is crucial to preserving the integrity of scientific publishing.

背景:自2022年11月以来,由生成式人工智能(GAI)驱动的会话工具已融入医疗保健领域的学术和专业实践。目的:确定并量化药学期刊、出版商和某些同行评议医学期刊协会向作者提出的GAI使用建议的流行程度。方法:采用横断面描述性研究对3家医学期刊协会(国际医学期刊编辑委员会、出版伦理委员会和世界医学编辑协会)、8家期刊出版商(b施普林格、Taylor & Francis、Elsevier、Wiley、Sage、Oxford Academic、BMJ和施普林格Nature)和22家药学期刊发布的GAI使用建议进行评价。具体建议的存在与否被编码。结果:通过分析,得出了关于科学出版中GAI使用的16条建议,分为报告与透明度、作者与问责制、使用限制3类。这些建议通常强调在手稿中披露GAI的使用以及禁止GAI作为作者。总体而言,22个药学期刊中有14个收录了16项建议中的一项或多项。在这14种期刊中,纳入推荐的平均比例为39%(标准差[SD] 12%)。当出版商和期刊协会的建议被纳入分析时,这一比例增加到51%(标准差为28%)。结论:提供给作者关于GAI使用的建议是高度可变的。因此,这项研究强调了在药学期刊中整合GAI方面缺乏共识,许多现行指南不足或过时。制定标准化和最新的指南对于维护科学出版的完整性至关重要。
{"title":"Survey of Guidance for Authors on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Journals.","authors":"Juliette Mutin, Jean-François Bussières","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since November 2022, conversational tools powered by generative artificial intelligence (GAI) have become integrated into academic and professional practice within the health care field.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and quantify the prevalence of recommendations to authors regarding the use of GAI as issued by pharmaceutical journals, their publishers, and certain associations of peer-reviewed medical journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the recommendations regarding GAI use issued by 3 medical journal associations (the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and the World Association of Medical Editors), 8 journal publishers (Springer, Taylor & Francis, Elsevier, Wiley, Sage, Oxford Academic, BMJ, and Springer Nature), and 22 pharmaceutical journals. The presence or absence of specific recommendations was coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis led to synthesis of 16 recommendations concerning use of GAI in scientific publishing, which were classified into 3 categories: reporting and transparency, authorship and accountability, and restrictions on use. The recommendations most often emphasized disclosure of GAI use in manuscripts and the prohibition of GAI as an author. Overall, 14 of the 22 pharmaceutical journals included one or more of the 16 recommendations. Among these 14 journals, the average proportion of included recommendations was 39% (standard deviation [SD] 12%). When recommendations suggested by publishers and journal associations were included in the analysis, as applicable, this proportion increased to 51% (SD 28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendations provided to authors about the use of GAI were highly variable. As such, this study highlights a lack of consensus on the integration of GAI within pharmaceutical journals, with many current guidelines being insufficient or outdated. The development of standardized and up-to-date guidelines is crucial to preserving the integrity of scientific publishing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Successful Desensitization in a Patient Receiving Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for ERBB2-Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer: Case Report. erbb2阳性IV期乳腺癌患者接受帕妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗成功脱敏:病例报告
Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3833
Drishtant Upadhyay, Rokhand Khademi, Leela John
{"title":"Successful Desensitization in a Patient Receiving Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for <i>ERBB2-</i>Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer: Case Report.","authors":"Drishtant Upadhyay, Rokhand Khademi, Leela John","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3833","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Definitive Cefazolin Therapy for Community-Acquired Enterobacterales Bacteremias across Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Breakpoints. 通过最低抑制浓度断点接受头孢唑林治疗社区获得性肠杆菌菌血症的成年患者的临床结果
Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3823
Jerry Lam, Russell O Forrest, Xena Li, Pavani Das, Tiffany Kan, Sumit Raybardhan

Background: In 2011, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for systemic cefazolin therapy to address rising antibiotic resistance. The revision was based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis with limited real-world data. Institutional review led to anticipation of a shift in classification for a substantial proportion of isolates from "susceptible" to "intermediate sensitivity". This change would result in increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in situations where cefazolin therapy would previously have been suitable.

Objective: To compare the risk of treatment failure, as defined by mortality, intensive care admission, relapse bacteremia, and/or antimicrobial escalation, in hospitalized adult patients with community-acquired monomicrobial Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis bacteremia using MIC of ≤ 4 μg/mL versus 8 μg/mL for definitive cefazolin therapy.

Methods: This single-centre, retrospective chart review involved patients admitted to North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model and compare treatment failure for MIC ≤ 4 μg/mL and MIC of 8 μg/mL.

Results: Of the 280 cultures eligible for analysis, 11 had MIC of 8 μg/mL, and the remaining 269 had MIC ≤ 4 μg/mL. For both groups, the treatment failure rate was 18.2%. With adjustment for confounding factors, there was a nonsignificant increase in the risk of treatment failure in patients with MIC of 8 μg/mL (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.24-4.96, p = 0.74).

Conclusions: Consistent with the existing literature, this study showed a trend toward increased risk of treatment failure with higher MIC. Future research should validate clinical outcomes with contemporary MIC breakpoints and investigate MIC susceptibility in gram-negative bacteremia from urinary sources.

背景:2011年,临床和实验室标准研究所修订了系统性头孢唑林治疗的最低抑制浓度(MIC)断点,以应对不断上升的抗生素耐药性。修订基于药代动力学-药效学分析和有限的真实世界数据。机构审查导致对相当大比例分离株的分类从“敏感”转向“中等敏感”的预期。这一变化将导致在以前头孢唑林治疗是合适的情况下增加使用广谱抗生素。目的:比较社区获得性单微生物大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌或神奇变形杆菌菌血症住院成人患者使用MIC≤4 μg/mL与头孢唑林治疗8 μg/mL时治疗失败的风险,以死亡率、重症监护入院率、复发菌血症和/或抗菌药物升级来定义。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性图表分析,纳入2015年1月1日至2022年12月31日在安大略省多伦多市北约克总医院住院的患者。采用多变量logistic回归对MIC≤4 μg/mL和MIC≤8 μg/mL的治疗失败进行建模和比较。结果:280例符合条件的培养物中,11例MIC为8 μg/mL,其余269例MIC≤4 μg/mL。两组治疗失败率均为18.2%。校正混杂因素后,MIC浓度为8 μg/mL的患者治疗失败风险无显著增加(优势比1.29,95%可信区间0.24 ~ 4.96,p = 0.74)。结论:与现有文献一致,本研究显示MIC越高,治疗失败的风险越高。未来的研究应验证具有当代MIC断点的临床结果,并调查尿源革兰氏阴性菌血症的MIC敏感性。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Definitive Cefazolin Therapy for Community-Acquired Enterobacterales Bacteremias across Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Breakpoints.","authors":"Jerry Lam, Russell O Forrest, Xena Li, Pavani Das, Tiffany Kan, Sumit Raybardhan","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2011, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for systemic cefazolin therapy to address rising antibiotic resistance. The revision was based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis with limited real-world data. Institutional review led to anticipation of a shift in classification for a substantial proportion of isolates from \"susceptible\" to \"intermediate sensitivity\". This change would result in increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in situations where cefazolin therapy would previously have been suitable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of treatment failure, as defined by mortality, intensive care admission, relapse bacteremia, and/or antimicrobial escalation, in hospitalized adult patients with community-acquired monomicrobial <i>Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, or <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> bacteremia using MIC of ≤ 4 μg/mL versus 8 μg/mL for definitive cefazolin therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective chart review involved patients admitted to North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model and compare treatment failure for MIC ≤ 4 μg/mL and MIC of 8 μg/mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 280 cultures eligible for analysis, 11 had MIC of 8 μg/mL, and the remaining 269 had MIC ≤ 4 μg/mL. For both groups, the treatment failure rate was 18.2%. With adjustment for confounding factors, there was a nonsignificant increase in the risk of treatment failure in patients with MIC of 8 μg/mL (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.24-4.96, <i>p</i> = 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with the existing literature, this study showed a trend toward increased risk of treatment failure with higher MIC. Future research should validate clinical outcomes with contemporary MIC breakpoints and investigate MIC susceptibility in gram-negative bacteremia from urinary sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Effects of Pharmacist Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 调查药师参与对急诊科结果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pub Date : 2026-01-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3816
Carolina Ghio, Raman Brar, Erik Youngson, Deonne Dersch-Mills

Background: Pharmacists in emergency departments (EDs) have been shown to enhance patient care, yet their integration into ED teams remains inconsistent.

Objectives: To determine whether involvement of an ED pharmacist influences patient flow in the ED (determined by length of the ED stay and return to the ED) and to describe the patient population seen by ED pharmacists.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults who visited EDs from April 1 to November 30, 2023, at 11 hospitals in Alberta but were not admitted to hospital. Patients seen by pharmacists were identified using the pharmacy's workload tracking system. Primary end points were ED length of stay (LOS) and a composite of return ED visit and death within 7 and 30 days.

Results: Of the 183 182 qualifying ED visits, pharmacists were involved in 7441. Patients in the group seen by a pharmacist were older, used more medications, and had more comorbidities. Relative to a matched cohort without pharmacist involvement, patients seen by pharmacists had longer median LOS in the ED (7.7 vs 6.7 hours, p < 0.001) and higher composite of return ED visit and death rates at 7 days (22.1% vs 9.2%, p < 0.001) and 30 days (30.0% vs 17.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although previous literature has shown that pharmacists improve quality-of-care measures in the ED, the findings of the current study suggest that ED pharmacists' services could be optimized further by targeting activities that reduce LOS and return visits. The study emphasizes the need for high-quality research on ED pharmacist practice to optimize clinical pharmacy services in the ED.

背景:急诊科(ED)的药剂师已被证明可以提高病人的护理水平,但他们与急诊科团队的整合仍然不一致。目的:确定急诊科药剂师的参与是否会影响急诊科的患者流量(由急诊科住院时间和返回急诊科的时间决定),并描述急诊科药剂师所见的患者群体。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2023年4月1日至11月30日在艾伯塔省11家医院就诊但未住院的急诊成人。使用药房的工作量跟踪系统确定药剂师所见的患者。主要终点为急诊科住院时间(LOS)以及7天和30天内急诊科复诊和死亡的综合数据。结果:在183182例符合条件的急诊就诊中,7441例涉及药师。药剂师看过的那组患者年龄更大,使用更多的药物,有更多的合并症。与没有药剂师参与的匹配队列相比,药剂师看到的患者在急诊科的中位LOS更长(7.7小时对6.7小时,p < 0.001),在7天(22.1%对9.2%,p < 0.001)和30天(30.0%对17.3%,p < 0.001),急诊科复诊和死亡率的综合比率更高。结论:尽管以前的文献表明,药剂师改善了急诊科的护理质量措施,但本研究的结果表明,急诊科药剂师的服务可以通过针对减少LOS和复诊的活动进一步优化。该研究强调需要对急诊科药师实践进行高质量的研究,以优化急诊科的临床药学服务。
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Pharmacist Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Carolina Ghio, Raman Brar, Erik Youngson, Deonne Dersch-Mills","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3816","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists in emergency departments (EDs) have been shown to enhance patient care, yet their integration into ED teams remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether involvement of an ED pharmacist influences patient flow in the ED (determined by length of the ED stay and return to the ED) and to describe the patient population seen by ED pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adults who visited EDs from April 1 to November 30, 2023, at 11 hospitals in Alberta but were not admitted to hospital. Patients seen by pharmacists were identified using the pharmacy's workload tracking system. Primary end points were ED length of stay (LOS) and a composite of return ED visit and death within 7 and 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 183 182 qualifying ED visits, pharmacists were involved in 7441. Patients in the group seen by a pharmacist were older, used more medications, and had more comorbidities. Relative to a matched cohort without pharmacist involvement, patients seen by pharmacists had longer median LOS in the ED (7.7 vs 6.7 hours, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and higher composite of return ED visit and death rates at 7 days (22.1% vs 9.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 30 days (30.0% vs 17.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although previous literature has shown that pharmacists improve quality-of-care measures in the ED, the findings of the current study suggest that ED pharmacists' services could be optimized further by targeting activities that reduce LOS and return visits. The study emphasizes the need for high-quality research on ED pharmacist practice to optimize clinical pharmacy services in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3816"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795323/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surveying Support Opportunities in Pharmacy Residency Training (SUPPORT): A Cross-Sectional Analysis and Focus Group of Year 1 Canadian Pharmacy Residents. 调查支持机会在药房住院医师培训(支持):横断面分析和焦点小组一年加拿大药房居民。
Pub Date : 2026-01-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.379
Jennifer Bolt, Jasmin Kaur Dhaliwal, Brooke Gessner, Cindy Natsheh, Nicole Bruchet

Background: Pharmacy residents are at risk of burnout, which can affect their well-being and performance and reduce their sense of satisfaction. Support interventions, specifically peer support, mentorship, and connectedness, may help to alleviate stress and improve well-being.

Objectives: To describe the current opportunities for and perceptions of support available to Canadian year 1 (Y1) pharmacy residents and to identify their interest in and desire for additional support opportunities.

Methods: A cross-sectional national online survey of Canadian Y1 residents from the 2021/22, 2022/23, and 2023/24 residency years was conducted. A subset of survey respondents participated in an online focus group designed to further explore themes identified in the survey.

Results: A total of 109 residents participated in the survey, and 7 participated in the focus group. Participants reported that support was available to them in the forms of mentorship (n = 99, 90.8%), wellness or self-care opportunities (n = 45, 41.3%), and peer connection (n = 94, 86.2%). Mentorship and peer connection were highly valued, yet just over half of participants reported being satisfied with the level of mentorship and peer connection they experienced. Identified opportunities for improvement included formalizing mentorship programs, with clear roles, protected time, intentional matching, and paid training for mentors; enhancing access to health and wellness resources; and designating site-based support for residents.

Conclusions: Mentorship and peer connection were the most commonly provided and highly valued supports for the Canadian Y1 pharmacy residents who participated in this study. Opportunities exist to enhance all forms of support offered to Y1 pharmacy residents, which ultimately may help to reduce resident burnout and improve resident well-being.

背景:药房居民存在职业倦怠风险,职业倦怠会影响其幸福感和工作绩效,降低其满意度。支持干预,特别是同伴支持、指导和联系,可能有助于缓解压力,提高幸福感。目的:描述目前加拿大一年级(Y1)药房居民获得支持的机会和看法,并确定他们对额外支持机会的兴趣和愿望。方法:对2021/22年、2022/23年和2023/24年居住年份的加拿大Y1居民进行横断面全国在线调查。一部分受访者参加了一个在线焦点小组,旨在进一步探讨调查中确定的主题。结果:共有109名居民参与调查,7名居民参与焦点小组。参与者报告说,他们可以获得指导(n = 99, 90.8%)、健康或自我照顾机会(n = 45, 41.3%)和同伴联系(n = 94, 86.2%)等形式的支持。师徒关系和同伴关系受到高度重视,但只有一半以上的参与者表示对他们所经历的师徒关系和同伴关系水平感到满意。确定的改进机会包括正规化指导计划,明确角色,保护时间,有意匹配,并为导师提供有偿培训;加强获得卫生和保健资源的机会;并为居民指定基于现场的支持。结论:师徒关系和同伴关系是参与本研究的加拿大Y1药房居民最常提供和高度重视的支持。有机会加强对Y1药房居民提供的各种形式的支持,这最终可能有助于减少居民的倦怠和提高居民的幸福感。
{"title":"Surveying Support Opportunities in Pharmacy Residency Training (SUPPORT): A Cross-Sectional Analysis and Focus Group of Year 1 Canadian Pharmacy Residents.","authors":"Jennifer Bolt, Jasmin Kaur Dhaliwal, Brooke Gessner, Cindy Natsheh, Nicole Bruchet","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacy residents are at risk of burnout, which can affect their well-being and performance and reduce their sense of satisfaction. Support interventions, specifically peer support, mentorship, and connectedness, may help to alleviate stress and improve well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the current opportunities for and perceptions of support available to Canadian year 1 (Y1) pharmacy residents and to identify their interest in and desire for additional support opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional national online survey of Canadian Y1 residents from the 2021/22, 2022/23, and 2023/24 residency years was conducted. A subset of survey respondents participated in an online focus group designed to further explore themes identified in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 residents participated in the survey, and 7 participated in the focus group. Participants reported that support was available to them in the forms of mentorship (<i>n</i> = 99, 90.8%), wellness or self-care opportunities (<i>n</i> = 45, 41.3%), and peer connection (<i>n</i> = 94, 86.2%). Mentorship and peer connection were highly valued, yet just over half of participants reported being satisfied with the level of mentorship and peer connection they experienced. Identified opportunities for improvement included formalizing mentorship programs, with clear roles, protected time, intentional matching, and paid training for mentors; enhancing access to health and wellness resources; and designating site-based support for residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mentorship and peer connection were the most commonly provided and highly valued supports for the Canadian Y1 pharmacy residents who participated in this study. Opportunities exist to enhance all forms of support offered to Y1 pharmacy residents, which ultimately may help to reduce resident burnout and improve resident well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145968114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Pharmacist Interventions and Interprofessional Agreement in Critical Care: Analysis Using the Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Tool. 药师干预和跨专业协议在重症监护中的影响:使用临床、经济和组织工具进行分析。
Pub Date : 2026-01-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3782
Emna Bokri, Hekma Hajji, Souha Chourabi, Chayma Ben Azouz, Nader Baffoun, Nesrine Hasni

Background: Pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) are essential for ensuring medication safety in high-risk settings like intensive care units (ICUs). Assessment of the potential relevance of PIs generally considers their clinical, economic, and organizational impacts.

Objective: To analyze PIs in an ICU and to evaluate the level of agreement on their impact across clinical, economic, and organizational dimensions.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a 10-bed ICU. All documented PIs performed by clinical pharmacists for patients admitted to the ICU and meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The clinical, economic, and organizational (CLEO) tool was used to assess the impacts of each intervention. Agreement among 3 health care professionals regarding the impact of these interventions was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) statistic.

Results: A total of 178 PIs were documented, of which 145 (involving 158 patients) were included in the analysis, after exclusion of PIs with incomplete data. The mean age of the 158 patients was 48 (standard deviation 20) years, and 117 (74%) were male. According to the clinical pharmacist evaluator, clinical impact was rated as "major" for 30 (21%) of the 145 PIs. In addition, 62 (43%) of the PIs were considered to have a "favourable" organizational impact, and 46 (32%) had a positive economic impact (i.e., decreased cost). The Fleiss κ coefficient revealed a low level of agreement among health care professionals regarding their evaluation of PIs across all 3 dimensions.

Conclusions: In the ICU setting, PIs play a vital role in improving patient outcomes; however, standardization of evaluation methods is essential to ensure consistency, reduce subjectivity, and enhance the overall impact of such interventions.

背景:药物干预(PIs)对于确保高危环境(如重症监护病房(icu))的用药安全至关重要。评估pi的潜在相关性通常考虑其临床、经济和组织影响。目的:分析ICU的pi,并评估其在临床、经济和组织方面的影响的一致程度。方法:在10张病床的ICU进行回顾性研究。所有临床药师对ICU住院患者进行的符合纳入标准的pi记录均被纳入。临床、经济和组织(CLEO)工具用于评估每种干预措施的影响。使用Fleiss kappa (κ)统计量评估3名卫生保健专业人员对这些干预措施影响的一致性。结果:共记录到178例PIs,排除资料不完整的PIs后,纳入145例(158例患者)分析。158例患者平均年龄48岁(标准差20),男性117例(74%)。根据临床药师评估者的意见,145个pi中有30个(21%)的临床影响被评为“主要”。此外,62个(43%)的pi被认为具有“有利的”组织影响,46个(32%)具有积极的经济影响(即降低成本)。Fleiss κ系数揭示了卫生保健专业人员对所有3个维度的pi评估的低水平一致性。结论:在ICU环境下,PIs在改善患者预后方面发挥着至关重要的作用;然而,评价方法的标准化对于确保一致性、减少主观性和增强此类干预措施的整体影响至关重要。
{"title":"Impact of Pharmacist Interventions and Interprofessional Agreement in Critical Care: Analysis Using the Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Tool.","authors":"Emna Bokri, Hekma Hajji, Souha Chourabi, Chayma Ben Azouz, Nader Baffoun, Nesrine Hasni","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) are essential for ensuring medication safety in high-risk settings like intensive care units (ICUs). Assessment of the potential relevance of PIs generally considers their clinical, economic, and organizational impacts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze PIs in an ICU and to evaluate the level of agreement on their impact across clinical, economic, and organizational dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in a 10-bed ICU. All documented PIs performed by clinical pharmacists for patients admitted to the ICU and meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The clinical, economic, and organizational (CLEO) tool was used to assess the impacts of each intervention. Agreement among 3 health care professionals regarding the impact of these interventions was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178 PIs were documented, of which 145 (involving 158 patients) were included in the analysis, after exclusion of PIs with incomplete data. The mean age of the 158 patients was 48 (standard deviation 20) years, and 117 (74%) were male. According to the clinical pharmacist evaluator, clinical impact was rated as \"major\" for 30 (21%) of the 145 PIs. In addition, 62 (43%) of the PIs were considered to have a \"favourable\" organizational impact, and 46 (32%) had a positive economic impact (i.e., decreased cost). The Fleiss κ coefficient revealed a low level of agreement among health care professionals regarding their evaluation of PIs across all 3 dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the ICU setting, PIs play a vital role in improving patient outcomes; however, standardization of evaluation methods is essential to ensure consistency, reduce subjectivity, and enhance the overall impact of such interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacy Services in a Novel Urgent Care Practice. 一种新型紧急护理实践中的药学服务。
Pub Date : 2026-01-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3793
Callan Willimott, Lori Albers, Nkem Iroh, Zack Dumont
{"title":"Pharmacy Services in a Novel Urgent Care Practice.","authors":"Callan Willimott, Lori Albers, Nkem Iroh, Zack Dumont","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3793","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Provincial Pharmacare Coverage for Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Long-Term Anticoagulation for Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism. 省级直接口服抗凝药物覆盖对无端静脉血栓栓塞长期抗凝治疗的影响。
Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3688
Alex Robin, Daniel Liwski, Sudeep Shivakumar, Allen Tran

Background: Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) has a high risk of recurrence, typically warranting indefinite anticoagulation. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have several advantages over warfarin and are thus recommended preferentially for long-term use. Until January 2024 in Nova Scotia, DOAC use beyond 6 months was often cost-prohibitive due to limited provincial funding.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of drug coverage on duration of anticoagulation for unprovoked VTE in Nova Scotia.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed for patients with unprovoked VTE seen in the Halifax Thrombosis Clinic between 2018 and 2020. Patients were grouped by anticoagulant class, type of insurance (private, provincial, or neither), and anticoagulation continuation or noncontinuation beyond 6 months. The primary outcome was the difference in anticoagulation use at 6 months according to type of insurance based on χ2 testing.

Results: The chart review identified 1016 patients seen during the study period, of whom 222 were included in the analysis. No significant difference in treatment duration was found among patients with private insurance, those covered under provincial pharmacare, and those with no insurance (mean duration 14.47, 12.39, and 13.89 months, respectively; p = 0.25). Scores for the Charlson comorbidity index and patient age did not significantly affect treatment duration. Patients with private insurance were more likely to receive a prescription for DOACs (p = 0.015 relative to provincial pharmacare, p < 0.001 relative to no insurance).

Conclusions: This study showed no statistically significant difference among types of insurance in terms of duration of anticoagulation after unprovoked VTE. However, patients with private insurance were more likely to use DOACs than warfarin. Since this study was completed, Nova Scotia Pharmacare now covers DOACs, but coverage remains limited in many other provinces. The results of this study may serve as evidence to lobby for extended DOAC funding in other provinces as a way to enhance care.

背景:非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)有很高的复发风险,通常需要无限期抗凝。直接作用口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林相比有几个优点,因此建议优先长期使用。直到2024年1月,在新斯科舍省,由于省资金有限,DOAC使用超过6个月的成本往往令人望而却步。目的:评价药物覆盖对新斯科舍省非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞患者抗凝时间的影响。方法:对2018年至2020年在哈利法克斯血栓形成诊所(Halifax Thrombosis Clinic)出现的非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞患者进行回顾性图表回顾。患者按抗凝药物类别、保险类型(私人、省级或两者都没有)、抗凝治疗持续或不持续超过6个月进行分组。基于χ2检验的主要结局是6个月时不同保险类型抗凝使用的差异。结果:图表回顾确定了研究期间见过的1016例患者,其中222例纳入分析。私营保险患者、省药保患者和无保险患者的治疗时间差异无统计学意义(平均治疗时间分别为14.47、12.39和13.89个月,p = 0.25)。Charlson合并症指数评分和患者年龄对治疗时间没有显著影响。有私人保险的患者更有可能获得doac处方(相对于省级药物管理p = 0.015,相对于无保险p < 0.001)。结论:本研究显示不同保险类型在非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞后抗凝时间方面无统计学差异。然而,有私人保险的患者更有可能使用doac而不是华法林。自从这项研究完成以来,新斯科舍省药物保险现在覆盖了doac,但在许多其他省份,覆盖范围仍然有限。本研究的结果可以作为证据,游说扩大DOAC资金在其他省份作为一种方式来加强护理。
{"title":"Impact of Provincial Pharmacare Coverage for Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Long-Term Anticoagulation for Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Alex Robin, Daniel Liwski, Sudeep Shivakumar, Allen Tran","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3688","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) has a high risk of recurrence, typically warranting indefinite anticoagulation. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have several advantages over warfarin and are thus recommended preferentially for long-term use. Until January 2024 in Nova Scotia, DOAC use beyond 6 months was often cost-prohibitive due to limited provincial funding.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of drug coverage on duration of anticoagulation for unprovoked VTE in Nova Scotia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was completed for patients with unprovoked VTE seen in the Halifax Thrombosis Clinic between 2018 and 2020. Patients were grouped by anticoagulant class, type of insurance (private, provincial, or neither), and anticoagulation continuation or noncontinuation beyond 6 months. The primary outcome was the difference in anticoagulation use at 6 months according to type of insurance based on χ<sup>2</sup> testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The chart review identified 1016 patients seen during the study period, of whom 222 were included in the analysis. No significant difference in treatment duration was found among patients with private insurance, those covered under provincial pharmacare, and those with no insurance (mean duration 14.47, 12.39, and 13.89 months, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.25). Scores for the Charlson comorbidity index and patient age did not significantly affect treatment duration. Patients with private insurance were more likely to receive a prescription for DOACs (<i>p</i> = 0.015 relative to provincial pharmacare, <i>p</i> < 0.001 relative to no insurance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed no statistically significant difference among types of insurance in terms of duration of anticoagulation after unprovoked VTE. However, patients with private insurance were more likely to use DOACs than warfarin. Since this study was completed, Nova Scotia Pharmacare now covers DOACs, but coverage remains limited in many other provinces. The results of this study may serve as evidence to lobby for extended DOAC funding in other provinces as a way to enhance care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 4","pages":"e3688"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interaction between Carbamazepine and Concomitant Levetiracetam Therapy in Patients with Epilepsy. 卡马西平与左乙拉西坦联合治疗癫痫的相互作用。
Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3846
Archana Mishra, Biswa Ranjan Mishra, Debadatta Mohapatra, Anand Srinivasan, Rituparna Maiti
{"title":"Interaction between Carbamazepine and Concomitant Levetiracetam Therapy in Patients with Epilepsy.","authors":"Archana Mishra, Biswa Ranjan Mishra, Debadatta Mohapatra, Anand Srinivasan, Rituparna Maiti","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3846","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 4","pages":"e3846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1