Embodied Gestures of Human Rights: Remorse, Sentiment, and Sympathy in Romantic Regency Drama

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1017/s0266464x24000198
Eva Urban
{"title":"Embodied Gestures of Human Rights: Remorse, Sentiment, and Sympathy in Romantic Regency Drama","authors":"Eva Urban","doi":"10.1017/s0266464x24000198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article demonstrates how the Enlightenment model of sentiment and sympathy is performed in embodied gestures of affective empathy-building, cross-cultural fraternity, and concern for human rights in three Romantic Regency tragedies: <span>Pizarro</span> (1799) by the Romantic dramatist August von Kotzebue, adapted from the German by the Irish dramatist Richard Brinsley Sheridan; <span>Remorse</span> (1813) by the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge; and <span>The Apostate</span> (1817) by the Irish dramatist Richard Lalor Sheil. In these plays, protagonists are moved towards sympathy and solidarity with others across cultural divisions and conflict. The discussion also examines how human rights issues are addressed in two plays by Scottish dramatists: Archibald MacLaren’s <span>The Negro Slaves</span> (1799) and Joanna Baillie’s <span>Rayner</span> (1804). Here the protagonists express remorse for engaging in conflict, colonialism, slavery, violence, and human rights abuses against others. All these texts share a common internationalist desire to unite humanity against oppression, injustice, and inequality, advocating human rights, equality, religious tolerance, and cosmopolitan citizenship.</p>","PeriodicalId":43990,"journal":{"name":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266464x24000198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article demonstrates how the Enlightenment model of sentiment and sympathy is performed in embodied gestures of affective empathy-building, cross-cultural fraternity, and concern for human rights in three Romantic Regency tragedies: Pizarro (1799) by the Romantic dramatist August von Kotzebue, adapted from the German by the Irish dramatist Richard Brinsley Sheridan; Remorse (1813) by the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge; and The Apostate (1817) by the Irish dramatist Richard Lalor Sheil. In these plays, protagonists are moved towards sympathy and solidarity with others across cultural divisions and conflict. The discussion also examines how human rights issues are addressed in two plays by Scottish dramatists: Archibald MacLaren’s The Negro Slaves (1799) and Joanna Baillie’s Rayner (1804). Here the protagonists express remorse for engaging in conflict, colonialism, slavery, violence, and human rights abuses against others. All these texts share a common internationalist desire to unite humanity against oppression, injustice, and inequality, advocating human rights, equality, religious tolerance, and cosmopolitan citizenship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权的体现姿态:浪漫摄政时期戏剧中的悔恨、情感和同情
本文论证了在三部浪漫主义摄政时期的悲剧中,启蒙运动的情感和同情模式是如何通过情感共鸣的建立、跨文化的博爱和对人权的关注等体现性姿态来表现的:皮萨罗》(Pizarro,1799 年)由浪漫主义戏剧家奥古斯特-冯-科采布创作,爱尔兰戏剧家理查德-布林斯利-谢里丹根据德文改编;《悔恨》(Remorse,1813 年)由英国诗人塞缪尔-泰勒-柯勒律治创作;《叛徒》(The Apostate,1817 年)由爱尔兰戏剧家理查德-拉罗尔-谢尔创作。在这些戏剧中,主人公跨越文化差异和冲突,与他人产生共鸣和团结。讨论还探讨了苏格兰戏剧家的两部戏剧是如何处理人权问题的:Archibald MacLaren 的《黑奴》(1799 年)和 Joanna Baillie 的《Rayner》(1804 年)。剧中主人公对参与冲突、殖民主义、奴隶制、暴力和侵犯他人人权的行为表示忏悔。所有这些文本都有一个共同的国际主义愿望,即团结人类反对压迫、不公正和不平等,倡导人权、平等、宗教宽容和世界公民意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: New Theatre Quarterly provides a vital international forum where theatrical scholarship and practice can meet and where prevailing dramatic assumptions can be subjected to vigorous critical questioning. It shows that theatre history has a contemporary relevance, that theatre studies need a methodology and that theatre criticism needs a language. The journal publishes news, analysis and debate within the field of theatre studies.
期刊最新文献
Documentary and Community Theatre with Young People in Madrid: The Creative Process of Mundo Quinta Embodied Gestures of Human Rights: Remorse, Sentiment, and Sympathy in Romantic Regency Drama British Theatre from Agitprop to ‘Primark Playwriting’ Othello: A Moor Rorschach Test Mysticism as Transgression in Chista Yasrebi’s Rahil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1