Iteration Complexity of Variational Quantum Algorithms

IF 5.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quantum Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.22331/q-2024-10-10-1495
Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Georgios Korpas, Jakub Marecek, Elton Yechao Zhu
{"title":"Iteration Complexity of Variational Quantum Algorithms","authors":"Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Georgios Korpas, Jakub Marecek, Elton Yechao Zhu","doi":"10.22331/q-2024-10-10-1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been much recent interest in near-term applications of quantum computers, i.e., using quantum circuits that have short decoherence times due to hardware limitations. Variational quantum algorithms (VQA), wherein an optimization algorithm implemented on a classical computer evaluates a parametrized quantum circuit as an objective function, are a leading framework in this space. An enormous breadth of algorithms in this framework have been proposed for solving a range of problems in machine learning, forecasting, applied physics, and combinatorial optimization, among others.<br/>\n<br/> In this paper, we analyze the iteration complexity of VQA, that is, the number of steps that VQA requires until its iterates satisfy a surrogate measure of optimality. We argue that although VQA procedures incorporate algorithms that can, in the idealized case, be modeled as classic procedures in the optimization literature, the particular nature of noise in near-term devices invalidates the claim of applicability of off-the-shelf analyses of these algorithms. Specifically, noise makes the evaluations of the objective function via quantum circuits $biased$. Commonly used optimization procedures, such as SPSA and the parameter shift rule, can thus be seen as derivative-free optimization algorithms with biased function evaluations, for which there are currently no iteration complexity guarantees in the literature. We derive the missing guarantees and find that the rate of convergence is unaffected. However, the level of bias contributes unfavorably to both the constant therein, and the asymptotic distance to stationarity, i.e., the more bias, the farther one is guaranteed, at best, to reach a stationary point of the VQA objective.","PeriodicalId":20807,"journal":{"name":"Quantum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-10-10-1495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been much recent interest in near-term applications of quantum computers, i.e., using quantum circuits that have short decoherence times due to hardware limitations. Variational quantum algorithms (VQA), wherein an optimization algorithm implemented on a classical computer evaluates a parametrized quantum circuit as an objective function, are a leading framework in this space. An enormous breadth of algorithms in this framework have been proposed for solving a range of problems in machine learning, forecasting, applied physics, and combinatorial optimization, among others.

In this paper, we analyze the iteration complexity of VQA, that is, the number of steps that VQA requires until its iterates satisfy a surrogate measure of optimality. We argue that although VQA procedures incorporate algorithms that can, in the idealized case, be modeled as classic procedures in the optimization literature, the particular nature of noise in near-term devices invalidates the claim of applicability of off-the-shelf analyses of these algorithms. Specifically, noise makes the evaluations of the objective function via quantum circuits $biased$. Commonly used optimization procedures, such as SPSA and the parameter shift rule, can thus be seen as derivative-free optimization algorithms with biased function evaluations, for which there are currently no iteration complexity guarantees in the literature. We derive the missing guarantees and find that the rate of convergence is unaffected. However, the level of bias contributes unfavorably to both the constant therein, and the asymptotic distance to stationarity, i.e., the more bias, the farther one is guaranteed, at best, to reach a stationary point of the VQA objective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变分量子算法的迭代复杂性
最近,人们对量子计算机的近期应用产生了浓厚兴趣,即使用因硬件限制而退相干时间较短的量子电路。变分量子算法(VQA)是这一领域的领先框架,它是在经典计算机上实施的优化算法,将参数化的量子电路作为目标函数进行评估。在这一框架下提出了大量算法,用于解决机器学习、预测、应用物理和组合优化等领域的一系列问题。在本文中,我们分析了 VQA 的迭代复杂度,即 VQA 在其迭代结果满足最优性的替代度量之前所需的步骤数。我们认为,虽然 VQA 程序包含的算法在理想化情况下可以作为优化文献中的经典程序建模,但近端设备中噪声的特殊性质使这些算法的现成分析的适用性失效。具体来说,噪声使得通过量子电路对目标函数的评估变得有失偏颇。因此,常用的优化程序,如 SPSA 和参数移动规则,可被视为具有偏差函数评估的无导数优化算法,目前文献中还没有迭代复杂度的保证。我们推导出了缺失的保证,并发现收敛速度不受影响。然而,偏差水平会对其中的常数和到静止点的渐近距离产生不利影响,也就是说,偏差越大,最多只能保证到达 VQA 目标静止点的距离越远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quantum
Quantum Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Quantum is an open-access peer-reviewed journal for quantum science and related fields. Quantum is non-profit and community-run: an effort by researchers and for researchers to make science more open and publishing more transparent and efficient.
期刊最新文献
Flying Spin Qubits in Quantum Dot Arrays Driven by Spin-Orbit Interaction Time dependent Markovian master equation beyond the adiabatic limit Construction of perfect tensors using biunimodular vectors Inevitability of knowing less than nothing Constant-depth circuits for Boolean functions and quantum memory devices using multi-qubit gates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1