Sidestream dark field video microscopy demonstrates shelf-stable blood products preserve the endothelial glycocalyx in a canine hemorrhagic shock model.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0152
Mark A Ryan, Rebekah Ford, Nicole Ewer, Kelly E Hall, Julien Guillaumin, Thomas H Edwards, Emilee C Venn, Lonnie E Grantham, Guillaume L Hoareau
{"title":"Sidestream dark field video microscopy demonstrates shelf-stable blood products preserve the endothelial glycocalyx in a canine hemorrhagic shock model.","authors":"Mark A Ryan, Rebekah Ford, Nicole Ewer, Kelly E Hall, Julien Guillaumin, Thomas H Edwards, Emilee C Venn, Lonnie E Grantham, Guillaume L Hoareau","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To utilize sidestream dark field video microscopic technology to evaluate the endothelium in a canine hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 purpose-bred adult dogs were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to hemorrhagic shock from September 2021 through June 2022. Each dog was resuscitated with 5 resuscitation strategies in an experimental crossover design study: (1) lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution; (2) canine chilled whole blood (CWB); (3) canine fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and packed RBCs (pRBC); (4) canine freeze-dried plasma (FDP) and hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC); or (5) HBOC/FDP and canine lyophilized platelets. Sidestream dark field video microscopic evaluation was performed at 5 time points: commencement, after hemorrhage, after shock, after resuscitation (T135), and conclusion (T180).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the perfused boundary region (PBR) measurements when comparing the LRS/HES resuscitation arm to the CWB and FFP/pRBC resuscitation arms at T180. A significant difference in PBR was appreciated in the LRS/HES arm at T135 and T180 compared to its baseline. No other significant differences in PBR were appreciated when resuscitation arms were compared longitudinally or to each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shelf-stable blood products preserved the endothelial glycocalyx similarly to CWB and pRBC/FFP as evaluated by sidestream dark field video microscopy. Lactated Ringer and HES solutions did not adequately preserve the endothelial glycocalyx compared to CWB and pRBC/FFP.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Shelf-stable blood products are a viable option to preserve the endothelial glycocalyx when used during hemorrhagic resuscitation in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To utilize sidestream dark field video microscopic technology to evaluate the endothelium in a canine hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation model.

Methods: 6 purpose-bred adult dogs were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to hemorrhagic shock from September 2021 through June 2022. Each dog was resuscitated with 5 resuscitation strategies in an experimental crossover design study: (1) lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution; (2) canine chilled whole blood (CWB); (3) canine fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and packed RBCs (pRBC); (4) canine freeze-dried plasma (FDP) and hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC); or (5) HBOC/FDP and canine lyophilized platelets. Sidestream dark field video microscopic evaluation was performed at 5 time points: commencement, after hemorrhage, after shock, after resuscitation (T135), and conclusion (T180).

Results: There was a significant difference between the perfused boundary region (PBR) measurements when comparing the LRS/HES resuscitation arm to the CWB and FFP/pRBC resuscitation arms at T180. A significant difference in PBR was appreciated in the LRS/HES arm at T135 and T180 compared to its baseline. No other significant differences in PBR were appreciated when resuscitation arms were compared longitudinally or to each other.

Conclusions: Shelf-stable blood products preserved the endothelial glycocalyx similarly to CWB and pRBC/FFP as evaluated by sidestream dark field video microscopy. Lactated Ringer and HES solutions did not adequately preserve the endothelial glycocalyx compared to CWB and pRBC/FFP.

Clinical relevance: Shelf-stable blood products are a viable option to preserve the endothelial glycocalyx when used during hemorrhagic resuscitation in dogs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧流暗视野视频显微镜显示,在犬失血性休克模型中,保质期长的血液制品可保留内皮糖萼。
目的:利用侧流暗视野视频显微技术评估犬失血性休克和复苏模型的内皮:方法:从 2021 年 9 月到 2022 年 6 月,对 6 只专门饲养的成年犬进行麻醉、器械操作和失血性休克试验。在一项实验性交叉设计研究中,每只狗都采用了 5 种复苏策略:(1)乳酸林格氏液(LRS)和羟乙基淀粉(HES)溶液;(2)犬冷冻全血(CWB);(3)犬新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)和包装红细胞(pRBC);(4)犬冻干血浆(FDP)和血红蛋白氧载体(HBOC);或(5)HBOC/FDP和犬冻干血小板。在开始、出血后、休克后、复苏后(T135)和结束(T180)5个时间点进行侧流暗视野视频显微镜评估:结果:在T180时,LRS/HES复苏组与CWB和FFP/pRBC复苏组的灌注边界区(PBR)测量值有明显差异。与基线相比,LRS/HES 复苏组在 T135 和 T180 时的 PBR 有明显差异。各复苏臂纵向比较或相互比较时,PBR均无其他明显差异:结论:通过侧流暗视野视频显微镜评估,保质期长的血液制品对血管内皮糖萼的保护作用与 CWB 和 pRBC/FFP 相似。与 CWB 和 pRBC/FFP 相比,乳酸林格液和 HES 溶液不能充分保存内皮糖萼:临床意义:在对狗进行出血复苏时,保质期长的血液制品是保存内皮糖萼的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
A Novel, Humane Method of Sterilizing Dogs, Cats, and Pigs. Retrospective analysis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry data demonstrates body composition changes with age in dogs and cats. Finite element analysis shows minimal stability difference between individualized mini-hemilaminectomy-corpectomy and partial lateral corpectomy in a dog model. Sidestream dark field video microscopy demonstrates shelf-stable blood products preserve the endothelial glycocalyx in a canine hemorrhagic shock model. Pharmacokinetics of intramuscular L-carvone in sheep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1