Comparative efficacy and choice of lipid-lowering drugs for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

The effect of exact classes of lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) on preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and poor renal outcomes is not well characterized in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population.

Methods

We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the protective effect of the LLDs in non-dialysis CKD patients. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant trials published before March 31, 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence of MACEs. The secondary outcomes comprised all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria, and safety.

Results

Forty-nine eligible RCTs with 77,826 participants with non-dialysis CKD were included. With moderate confidence in the evidence, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed statistically significantly more efficacy in reducing the risk of MACE, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.33–0.91) for rosuvastatin and 0.67 (0.49–0.90) for atorvastatin, respectively, compared with the control group. For the change in the eGFR, atorvastatin (mean difference [MD], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.18), rosuvastatin (MD, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 2.83), and statin plus ezetimibe (MD, 2.35; 95% CI, 0.44 to 4.26) showed statistically significant increases in the mean eGFR.

Conclusion

In patients with non-dialysis CKD, there is sufficient evidence to show that rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were statistically significantly more effective and preferable in reducing the risk of MACE and increasing the mean eGFR compared with the control group.