Patterns of change in the association between socioeconomic status and body mass index distribution in India, 1999-2021.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.04171
Meekang Sung, Anoop Jain, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, Bharati Kulkarni, S V Subramanian
{"title":"Patterns of change in the association between socioeconomic status and body mass index distribution in India, 1999-2021.","authors":"Meekang Sung, Anoop Jain, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, Bharati Kulkarni, S V Subramanian","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body mass index (BMI) is an important indicator of human health. However, trends in socioeconomic inequalities in BMI over time throughout India are understudied. Filling this gap will elucidate which socioeconomic groups are still at risk for adverse BMI values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This repeated cross-sectional study analysed four rounds of India's National Family Health Surveys (1998-1999, 2005-2006, 2015-2016, and 2019-2021). The outcome was BMI categories, measured in kilogram per metres squared (kg/m<sup>2</sup>), defined as severely/moderately thin (<17.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), mildly thin (17.0-18.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). We examined the prevalence, standardised absolute change, and odds ratios estimated by multivariable regression models by household wealth and levels of education, two important measures of socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 1 244 149 women and 227 585 men. We found that those in the lowest SES categories were more likely to be severely/moderately thin or mildly thin. Conversely, those in the highest SES groups were more likely to be overweight or obese. The gradients were steepest for wealth, and this was substantiated by the results of regression models for every wave. There has been a decline in the difference in the prevalence of severely/moderately thin or mildly thin between SES groups when comparing the years 1999 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SES-based inequalities in BMI were smaller in 2021 compared to 1999. However, those in low SES groups were most likely to be severely/moderately thin or mildly thin while those in high SES groups were more likely to be overweight or obese. Future research should explore the pathways that link SES with BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Body mass index (BMI) is an important indicator of human health. However, trends in socioeconomic inequalities in BMI over time throughout India are understudied. Filling this gap will elucidate which socioeconomic groups are still at risk for adverse BMI values.

Methods: This repeated cross-sectional study analysed four rounds of India's National Family Health Surveys (1998-1999, 2005-2006, 2015-2016, and 2019-2021). The outcome was BMI categories, measured in kilogram per metres squared (kg/m2), defined as severely/moderately thin (<17.0 kg/m2), mildly thin (17.0-18.4 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m2). We examined the prevalence, standardised absolute change, and odds ratios estimated by multivariable regression models by household wealth and levels of education, two important measures of socioeconomic status (SES).

Results: The study population consisted of 1 244 149 women and 227 585 men. We found that those in the lowest SES categories were more likely to be severely/moderately thin or mildly thin. Conversely, those in the highest SES groups were more likely to be overweight or obese. The gradients were steepest for wealth, and this was substantiated by the results of regression models for every wave. There has been a decline in the difference in the prevalence of severely/moderately thin or mildly thin between SES groups when comparing the years 1999 and 2021.

Conclusions: SES-based inequalities in BMI were smaller in 2021 compared to 1999. However, those in low SES groups were most likely to be severely/moderately thin or mildly thin while those in high SES groups were more likely to be overweight or obese. Future research should explore the pathways that link SES with BMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1999-2021 年印度社会经济地位与身体质量指数分布之间关系的变化模式。
背景:体重指数(BMI)是人类健康的一个重要指标。然而,对印度全国各地社会经济不平等情况下的体重指数变化趋势研究不足。填补这一空白将阐明哪些社会经济群体仍有可能出现不利的体重指数值:这项重复性横断面研究分析了四轮印度全国家庭健康调查(1998-1999 年、2005-2006 年、2015-2016 年和 2019-2021 年)。研究结果为 BMI 类别,以每平方米千克(kg/m2)为单位,定义为重度/中度消瘦(2)、轻度消瘦(17.0-18.4 kg/m2)、正常(18.5-24.9 kg/m2)、超重(25.0-29.9 kg/m2)和肥胖(≥30.0 kg/m2)。我们根据家庭财富和教育水平这两个衡量社会经济地位(SES)的重要指标,研究了多变量回归模型估计的患病率、标准化绝对变化和几率:研究对象包括 1 244 149 名女性和 227 585 名男性。我们发现,社会经济地位最低的人群更有可能属于重度/中度消瘦或轻度消瘦。相反,社会经济地位最高的人群更有可能超重或肥胖。财富的梯度最为陡峭,每个波次的回归模型结果都证实了这一点。与 1999 年和 2021 年相比,不同社会经济地位群体之间的重度/中度消瘦或轻度消瘦患病率差异有所下降:结论:与 1999 年相比,2021 年基于社会经济地位的 BMI 不平等现象有所减少。结论:与 1999 年相比,2021 年基于社会经济地位的体重指数不平等现象有所减少。然而,低社会经济地位群体的人最有可能严重/中度消瘦或轻度消瘦,而高社会经济地位群体的人则更有可能超重或肥胖。未来的研究应探索将社会经济地位与体重指数联系起来的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Academic vs. industry-sponsored trials: A global survey on differences, similarities, and future improvements. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a prediction model for community-based screening of active tuberculosis. Does work modify the relationship between violence and mental health among young people? Evidence from the Violence Against Children Surveys in Uganda, Nigeria and Colombia. Impact of COVID-19 on the utilisation of maternal health services in Bangladesh: A division-level analysis. Impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing maternal mortality in 26 low- and middle-income countries: A modelling study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1