Artificial Intelligence Improves Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning CT.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.046
Giuseppe Tremamunno, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, U Joseph Schoepf, Emese Zsarnoczay, Gilberto J Aquino, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Andrea Laghi, Athira Jacob, Puneet Sharma, Saikiran Rapaka, Jim O'Doherty, Pal Spruill Suranyi, Ismail Mikdat Kabakus, Nicholas S Amoroso, Daniel H Steinberg, Tilman Emrich, Akos Varga-Szemes
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Improves Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning CT.","authors":"Giuseppe Tremamunno, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, U Joseph Schoepf, Emese Zsarnoczay, Gilberto J Aquino, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Andrea Laghi, Athira Jacob, Puneet Sharma, Saikiran Rapaka, Jim O'Doherty, Pal Spruill Suranyi, Ismail Mikdat Kabakus, Nicholas S Amoroso, Daniel H Steinberg, Tilman Emrich, Akos Varga-Szemes","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is mandatory before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software in automatically analyzing cardiac parameters from pre-procedural CCTA to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in TAVR patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing pre-TAVR CCTA were retrospectively included. AI software automatically extracted 34 morphologic and volumetric cardiac parameters characterizing the ventricles, atria, myocardium, and epicardial adipose tissue. Clinical information and outcomes were recorded from institutional database. Cox regression analysis identified predictors of MACE, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, unstable angina, and cardiac death. Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index, and nested models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Manual analysis of 170 patients assessed agreement with automated measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 648 enrolled patients (77 ± 9.3 years, 58.9% men), 116 (17.9%) experienced MACE within a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range 10-40). After adjusting for clinical parameters, only left ventricle long axis shortening (LV-LAS) was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11]; p = 0.04), with significantly improved C-index (0.620 vs. 0.633; p < 0.001). When adjusted for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, LV-LAS was also predictive of MACE (HR, 1.08 [95%CI, 1.03-1.13]; p = 0.002), while improving model performance (C-index: 0.557 vs. 0.598; p < 0.001). All parameters showed good or excellent agreement with manual measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated AI-based comprehensive cardiac assessment enables pre-TAVR MACE prediction, with LV-LAS outperforming all other parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is mandatory before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software in automatically analyzing cardiac parameters from pre-procedural CCTA to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in TAVR patients.

Materials and methods: Patients undergoing pre-TAVR CCTA were retrospectively included. AI software automatically extracted 34 morphologic and volumetric cardiac parameters characterizing the ventricles, atria, myocardium, and epicardial adipose tissue. Clinical information and outcomes were recorded from institutional database. Cox regression analysis identified predictors of MACE, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, unstable angina, and cardiac death. Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index, and nested models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Manual analysis of 170 patients assessed agreement with automated measurements.

Results: Among the 648 enrolled patients (77 ± 9.3 years, 58.9% men), 116 (17.9%) experienced MACE within a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range 10-40). After adjusting for clinical parameters, only left ventricle long axis shortening (LV-LAS) was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11]; p = 0.04), with significantly improved C-index (0.620 vs. 0.633; p < 0.001). When adjusted for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, LV-LAS was also predictive of MACE (HR, 1.08 [95%CI, 1.03-1.13]; p = 0.002), while improving model performance (C-index: 0.557 vs. 0.598; p < 0.001). All parameters showed good or excellent agreement with manual measurements.

Conclusion: Automated AI-based comprehensive cardiac assessment enables pre-TAVR MACE prediction, with LV-LAS outperforming all other parameters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能提高了经导管主动脉瓣置换术规划 CT 患者主要不良心血管事件的预测能力。
理由和目的:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前必须进行冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)。我们的目的是评估人工智能(AI)驱动的软件自动分析术前 CCTA 心脏参数以预测 TAVR 患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的效果:回顾性纳入接受TAVR术前CCTA检查的患者。人工智能软件自动提取了心室、心房、心肌和心外膜脂肪组织的 34 个形态和容积心脏参数。机构数据库记录了临床信息和结果。Cox 回归分析确定了 MACE 的预测因素,包括非致命性心肌梗死、心力衰竭住院、不稳定型心绞痛和心源性死亡。使用哈雷尔 C 指数评估模型性能,使用似然比检验比较嵌套模型。对 170 名患者进行的人工分析评估了与自动测量的一致性:在 648 名入选患者(77 ± 9.3 岁,58.9% 为男性)中,116 人(17.9%)在中位随访 24 个月(四分位间范围 10-40 个月)内发生 MACE。调整临床参数后,只有左心室长轴缩短率(LV-LAS)是MACE的独立预测因素(危险比[HR],1.05[95%置信区间,1.05-1.11];P = 0.04),C指数显著改善(0.620 vs. 0.633;P 结论:基于人工智能的自动综合心脏评估能够预测TAVR前的MACE,其中LV-LAS优于所有其他参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical-MRI, Radiomics, and Integrated Nomogram Models for Preoperative Prediction of Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Pulmonary 129Xe MRI: CNN Registration and Segmentation to Generate Ventilation Defect Percent with Multi-center Validation. Prognostic value of extracellular volume fraction in myocardial infarction and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter study. Accelerated spine MRI with deep learning based image reconstruction: a prospective comparison with standard MRI. Beyond the Procedure: The Hidden Crisis of Moral Injury in Interventional Radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1