Comparative Evaluation of Clinical-MRI, Radiomics, and Integrated Nomogram Models for Preoperative Prediction of Placenta Accreta Spectrum.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.021
Zhiwei Wang, Xinyao Jiao, Weiwu Liu, Han Song, Jiapeng Li, Jing Hu, Yuanbo Huang, Yang Liu, Sa Huang
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Clinical-MRI, Radiomics, and Integrated Nomogram Models for Preoperative Prediction of Placenta Accreta Spectrum.","authors":"Zhiwei Wang, Xinyao Jiao, Weiwu Liu, Han Song, Jiapeng Li, Jing Hu, Yuanbo Huang, Yang Liu, Sa Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>The escalating incidence of placental accreta spectrum (PAS), a pregnancy complication, underscores the need for accurate prenatal diagnosis to guide optimal management strategies. This study aims to develop, validate, and compare various prenatal PAS prediction models integrating clinical data, MRI signs, and radiomics signatures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cohort comprising 111 patients (72 with PAS and 39 without, denoted as N-PAS) served as the training set, while another 47 patients (33 PAS and 14 N-PAS) constituted the validation set. Clinical features and MRI signs were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses to construct the Clinical-MRI model. Radiomic features were extracted from MRI images and refined through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm, thereby establishing the Radiomics model. An optimal set of radiomic features was utilized to derive the Radscore, which was then integrated with clinical features and MRI signs to formulate the Nomogram model. The performance of these models was comprehensively evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation set evaluation, the Nomogram model, which integrated Radscore, a pivotal clinical indicator, and two MRI signs, demonstrated superior performance. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI: 0.745, 0.978), this model significantly outperformed both the clinical-MRI model (AUC = 0.796, 95% CI: 0.649, 0.943) and the radiomics model (AUC = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.531, 0.877). Specifically, the Nomogram model achieved a high sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 78.6% in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), thereby offering clinicians a precise and efficient diagnostic aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiomics-derived Radscore serves as an independent predictor for prenatal PAS. Combining Radscore with clinical features and MRI signs into a Nomogram model provides a non-invasive tool with high sensitivity or specificity for PAS diagnosis, enhancing prenatal assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: The escalating incidence of placental accreta spectrum (PAS), a pregnancy complication, underscores the need for accurate prenatal diagnosis to guide optimal management strategies. This study aims to develop, validate, and compare various prenatal PAS prediction models integrating clinical data, MRI signs, and radiomics signatures.

Materials and methods: A cohort comprising 111 patients (72 with PAS and 39 without, denoted as N-PAS) served as the training set, while another 47 patients (33 PAS and 14 N-PAS) constituted the validation set. Clinical features and MRI signs were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses to construct the Clinical-MRI model. Radiomic features were extracted from MRI images and refined through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm, thereby establishing the Radiomics model. An optimal set of radiomic features was utilized to derive the Radscore, which was then integrated with clinical features and MRI signs to formulate the Nomogram model. The performance of these models was comprehensively evaluated and compared.

Results: In the validation set evaluation, the Nomogram model, which integrated Radscore, a pivotal clinical indicator, and two MRI signs, demonstrated superior performance. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI: 0.745, 0.978), this model significantly outperformed both the clinical-MRI model (AUC = 0.796, 95% CI: 0.649, 0.943) and the radiomics model (AUC = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.531, 0.877). Specifically, the Nomogram model achieved a high sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 78.6% in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), thereby offering clinicians a precise and efficient diagnostic aid.

Conclusion: The radiomics-derived Radscore serves as an independent predictor for prenatal PAS. Combining Radscore with clinical features and MRI signs into a Nomogram model provides a non-invasive tool with high sensitivity or specificity for PAS diagnosis, enhancing prenatal assessment and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于术前预测胎盘早剥谱的临床-磁共振成像、放射线组学和综合提名图模型的比较评估。
理由和目的:胎盘早剥谱(PAS)是一种妊娠并发症,其发病率不断上升,这凸显了准确产前诊断以指导最佳管理策略的必要性。本研究旨在开发、验证和比较整合了临床数据、磁共振成像征象和放射组学特征的各种产前 PAS 预测模型:由 111 名患者(72 名 PAS 患者和 39 名非 PAS 患者,称为 N-PAS)组成的队列作为训练集,另外 47 名患者(33 名 PAS 患者和 14 名 N-PAS 患者)构成验证集。对临床特征和磁共振成像体征进行单变量和多变量分析,以构建临床-磁共振成像模型。从核磁共振成像图像中提取放射组学特征,并通过最小绝对收缩和选择操作器(LASSO)算法进行细化,从而建立放射组学模型。利用一组最佳的放射组学特征得出 Radscore,然后将其与临床特征和核磁共振成像体征相结合,形成 Nomogram 模型。对这些模型的性能进行了综合评估和比较:结果:在验证集评估中,整合了 Radscore、一个关键临床指标和两个 MRI 体征的 Nomogram 模型表现优异。该模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.861(95% CI:0.745,0.978),明显优于临床-MRI 模型(AUC = 0.796,95% CI:0.649,0.943)和放射组学模型(AUC = 0.704,95% CI:0.531,0.877)。特别是,在产前诊断胎盘早剥谱系(PAS)时,Nomogram 模型的灵敏度高达 81.8%,特异度为 78.6%,从而为临床医生提供了精确、高效的诊断帮助:结论:放射组学得出的 Radscore 是产前 PAS 的独立预测指标。将 Radscore 与临床特征和 MRI 体征结合到一个 Nomogram 模型中,可提供一种对 PAS 诊断具有高灵敏度或特异性的无创工具,从而加强产前评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Are Mock Interviews Worth It? A Different Perspective in a Middle-Income Country. Intracranial Calcification Detection; a Comparison Between Micro-CT, Conventional CT and Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT. Overview of Radiological Classification Systems for Pars Interarticularis Stress Injuries-and Proposal of the BROPI Classification. Photon-counting CT Spectral Localizer Radiographs for Lumbar Areal Bone Mineral Density Quantification: A Clinical Study on Accuracy, Reliability, and Diagnostic Performance for Osteoporosis. Generative AI as Both Threat to and Tool for Maintaining Radiology Research Propriety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1