Mobile applications for promoting and supporting breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Maternal and Child Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1111/mcn.13733
Monika Ziebart, Michael Kammermeier, Berthold Koletzko, Bernadeta Patro-Golab
{"title":"Mobile applications for promoting and supporting breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Monika Ziebart, Michael Kammermeier, Berthold Koletzko, Bernadeta Patro-Golab","doi":"10.1111/mcn.13733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breastfeeding practices require improvement. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and analytic observational studies to assess effects of mobile applications (apps) aiming to support and promote breastfeeding targeting pregnant women, mothers of infants or their partners, on breastfeeding outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Association of Computing Machinery Digital Library from 1 July 2008 to 29 November 2022, with lack of coverage of the most recent period before publication date being a limitation of this review. We performed meta-analyses of findings from RCTs on primary outcomes, namely early breastfeeding initiation, exclusive and any breastfeeding rates. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for risk of bias assessment. Six RCTs, one quasi-experimental and two cohort studies, mainly from high-income countries, were included. Most studies focused on maternal app usage starting from pregnancy. One study targeted fathers as app-users. Population characteristics, such as parity or delivery mode, apps scope of content and applied active components varied between studies. Main methodological limitations of studies were baseline differences between groups and lack of blinding. Compared to controls, app usage tended to increase the odds of exclusive breastfeeding. This nonsignificant effect was most pronounced at 1-1.5 months (n = 1294, odds ratio 1.45 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.83, 2.54), with considerable heterogeneity between studies [I<sup>2</sup> 77%]), but less so at 3 and 6 months post-partum. The odds of early breastfeeding initiation, any breastfeeding at all time points were similar among groups. However, two cohort studies reported increased odds of exclusive and/or any breastfeeding at different time points. In conclusion, evidence is insufficient to show sustained beneficial effects of breastfeeding promotion and support through mobile apps on breastfeeding rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breastfeeding practices require improvement. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and analytic observational studies to assess effects of mobile applications (apps) aiming to support and promote breastfeeding targeting pregnant women, mothers of infants or their partners, on breastfeeding outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Association of Computing Machinery Digital Library from 1 July 2008 to 29 November 2022, with lack of coverage of the most recent period before publication date being a limitation of this review. We performed meta-analyses of findings from RCTs on primary outcomes, namely early breastfeeding initiation, exclusive and any breastfeeding rates. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for risk of bias assessment. Six RCTs, one quasi-experimental and two cohort studies, mainly from high-income countries, were included. Most studies focused on maternal app usage starting from pregnancy. One study targeted fathers as app-users. Population characteristics, such as parity or delivery mode, apps scope of content and applied active components varied between studies. Main methodological limitations of studies were baseline differences between groups and lack of blinding. Compared to controls, app usage tended to increase the odds of exclusive breastfeeding. This nonsignificant effect was most pronounced at 1-1.5 months (n = 1294, odds ratio 1.45 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.83, 2.54), with considerable heterogeneity between studies [I2 77%]), but less so at 3 and 6 months post-partum. The odds of early breastfeeding initiation, any breastfeeding at all time points were similar among groups. However, two cohort studies reported increased odds of exclusive and/or any breastfeeding at different time points. In conclusion, evidence is insufficient to show sustained beneficial effects of breastfeeding promotion and support through mobile apps on breastfeeding rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进和支持母乳喂养的移动应用程序:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
母乳喂养的做法需要改进。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)和分析性观察研究进行了系统性回顾,以评估以孕妇、婴儿母亲或其伴侣为对象、旨在支持和促进母乳喂养的移动应用程序(App)对母乳喂养结果的影响。我们检索了 2008 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 29 日期间的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL 和美国计算机协会数字图书馆,本综述的局限性在于没有涵盖发表日期之前的最近时期。我们对研究性试验的主要结果(即早期母乳喂养、纯母乳喂养率和任何母乳喂养率)进行了荟萃分析。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的工具用于评估偏倚风险。共纳入了六项研究性临床试验、一项准实验研究和两项队列研究,这些研究主要来自高收入国家。大多数研究侧重于母亲从怀孕开始使用应用程序的情况。一项研究将父亲作为应用程序用户。不同研究的研究对象特征各不相同,如准妈妈或分娩方式、应用程序的内容范围和应用的有效成分。研究在方法上的主要局限是组间基线差异和缺乏盲法。与对照组相比,使用应用程序往往会增加纯母乳喂养的几率。这种非显著影响在产后 1-1.5 个月时最为明显(n = 1294,几率比 1.45(95% 置信区间,CI 0.83,2.54),不同研究之间存在相当大的异质性[I2 77%]),但在产后 3 个月和 6 个月时则不那么明显。各组间早期开始母乳喂养和在所有时间点进行母乳喂养的几率相似。然而,有两项队列研究报告称,在不同的时间点,纯母乳喂养和/或任何母乳喂养的几率都有所增加。总之,目前还没有足够的证据表明,通过手机应用推广和支持母乳喂养对母乳喂养率有持续的有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the longitudinal trends (2005-2018) and multilevel risk factors of complementary feeding in Guinea. Quantification of persistent organic pollutants in breastmilk and estimated infant intake, Norway. Canned complementary porridges for infants and young children (6-23 months) based on African indigenous crops; nutritional content, consistency, sensory, and affordability compared to traditional porridges based on maize and finger millet. Hemoglobin level and common mental disorder among school adolescent girls in Central Ethiopia: Structural Equation Model. Mothers' and fathers' experiences of breastfeeding and returning to paid work after birth: A mixed-method study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1